Tathwir Namudhaj at-Ta'lim al-Mudmaj li Tanmiyat Maharat al-Fahm al-Qira'i fi Qism al-Adab al-'Arabi bi Jami'at Malang al-Hukumiyah

Moch. Wahib Dariyadi

Abstract


The Department of Arabic Literature at Malang State University faces a problem of weak reading comprehension among students in the extensive reading course, with an average score of 77.18. This issue is attributed to the educational materials not being designed to meet the students' needs and the ineffective use of technology. This research aims to develop a blended learning model to improve students' reading comprehension, focusing on: (1) producing an Arabic language teaching model based on blended learning in the extensive reading course, (2) assessing the validity of the developed model, and (3) measuring the effectiveness of the model's application in improving academic achievement. The study used the development method by modifying the Borg and Gall model, and data were collected through interviews, observations, questionnaires, and tests, analyzed both qualitatively descriptively and statistically. The results showed: (1) the production of an Arabic language teaching program based on blended learning that includes an electronic learning management system and a discussion forum, (2) the developed model is valid for use according to experts' opinions, and (3) the developed model is effective in improving students' academic achievement based on a paired T-test with a probability value of 0.000 and a calculated T value of -23.869, indicating statistically significant differences in academic achievement after the model's application. This research presented an educational model for reading comprehension skills in the extensive reading course at the university level, with the integration of technology into the teaching process to meet the needs of students in learning the Arabic language, which opens up new information to develop their language skills.

تواجه قسم الأدب العربي بجامعة مالانج الحكومية مشكلة في ضعف مهارة الفهم القرائي في مادة القراءة الموسعة، بمتوسط درجة 77.18. ويعود ذلك إلى عدم تطوير المواد التعليمية بما يلبي احتياجات الطلبة وعدم الاستفادة من التكنولوجيا بشكل فعال في عملية التعليم. يهدف هذا البحث إلى تطوير نموذج التعليم المدمج لتحسين الفهم القرائي للطلبة، ويركز على: (1) إنتاج نموذج تعليم اللغة العربية القائم على التعليم المدمج في مادة القراءة الموسعة، (2) قياس صلاحية النموذج المطور، و (3) قياس فعالية تطبيق النموذج المطور لتحسين التحصيل الدراسي. استخدم الباحث هذه الدراسة منهج التطوير بتعديل من نموذج بروج وغال، وتم جمع البيانات من خلال المقابلات والملاحظات والاستبانات والاختبارات، وتحليلها وصفياً كيفياً وإحصائياً. أظهرت النتائج: (1) إنتاج برنامج تعليم اللغة العربية القائم على التعليم المدمج يتضمن نظام إدارة التعلم الإلكتروني ومنتدى النقاش، (2) النموذج المطور صالح للاستخدام حسب آراء الخبراء، و (3) النموذج المطور فعال في تحسين التحصيل الدراسي للطلبة بناءً على اختبار T المزدوج بمعامل احتمالية 0.000 وT المحسوب -23.869 مما يدل على وجود فروق دالة إحصائياً في التحصيل الدراسي بعد تطبيق النموذج. قدم هذا البحث نموذجا تعليميا لمهارة الفهم القرائي في مادة القراءة الموسعة في المستوى الجامعي، مع دمج التكنولوجيا في عملية التدريس لتلبية احتياجات الطلبة في تعليم اللغة العربية مما يفتح معلومات جديدة لتنمية مهاراتهم اللغوية.

Keywords


Development; Teaching Materials; Blended Learning; Comprehensive Reading; Extensive Reading

References


Abedi, E. A., Prestridge, S., & Hodge, S. (2024). Teachers’ beliefs about technology integration in Ghana: a qualitative study of teachers’, headteachers’ and education officials’ perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5857–5877.

Alebaikan, R., & Troudi, S. (2010). Blended learning in Saudi universities: Challenges and perspectives. ALT-J: Research in Learning Technology, 18(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687761003657614

Alieto, E., Abequibel-Encarnacion, B., Estigoy, E., Balasa, K., Eijansantos, A., & Torres-Toukoumidis, A. (2024). Teaching inside a digital classroom: A quantitative analysis of attitude, technological competence and access among teachers across subject disciplines. Heliyon, 10(2).

Ashour, I. (2018). Istrategiat alfahm alqira'i: alttahawul min tasnif al'istratijiat 'iilaa ta'limiha ealaa mustawa qism allugha.

Atiyah, M. A. (2014). Istrategiat ma wara' almaerifa fi fahm almaqru'. Dar Al-Manahej for Publishing.

Allan, B. (2007). Blended Learning: Tools for Teaching and Training. Facet. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=lU4PAQAAMAAJ

Ang, J. W. J., Ng, Y. N., Lee, L. H.-W., & Yong, J. Y. (2024). Exploring Students’ Learning Experience and Engagement in Asynchronous Learning Using the Community of Inquiry Framework through Educational Design Research. Education Sciences, 14(3), 215.

Batista, J., Santos, H., & Marques, R. P. (2021). The use of ict for communication between teachers and students in the context of higher education institutions. Information (Switzerland), 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/info12110479

Behjat, F., Yamini, M., & Bagheri, M. S. (2012). Blended Learning: A Ubiquitous Learning Environment for Reading Comprehension. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v2n1p97

Duke, N. (2003). Comprehension instruction for informational text. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Michigan Reading Association, Grand Rapids, MI.

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5

ElSayad, G. (2023). Can learning presence be the fourth community of inquiry presence? Examining the extended community of inquiry framework in blended learning using confirmatory factor analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7291–7316.

Gitomer, D. H. (2019). Content Knowledge for Teaching in Teacher Education. In M. A. Peters (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Teacher Education (pp. 1–6). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1179-6_175-1

Gustian, K., Aridah, A., & Rusmawaty, D. (2023). The benefits of flipped classroom model for Efl learners. Journal on Education, 5(4), 13918–13935.

Hunter, B. (2015). Teaching for engagement: Part 1--Constructivist principles, case-based teaching, and active learning. College Quarterly, 18(2), n2.

Ilie, V., & Frăsineanu*, E. S. (2019). Traditional Learning Versus E-Learning. 1192–1201. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.08.03.146

Kantun, S., & ASP, R. S. (2016). IMPLEMENTASI BLENDED LEARNING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KREATIVITAS DAN HASIL BELAJAR PADA MATA PELAJARAN EKONOMI PESERTA DIDIK KELAS XI IPS-2 SMAN 5 JEMBER SEMESTER GASAL TAHUN 2015/2016. Chemistry: Bulgarian Journal of Science Education Природните Науки в Образованието, 25(6), 141–152.

Karaoglan-yılmaz, F. G., Ustun, A. B., Zhang, K., & Yılmaz, R. (2023). Metacognitive awareness, reflective thinking, problem solving, and community of inquiry as predictors of academic self-efficacy in blended learning: A correlational study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 24(1), 20–36.

Khawaja, S., & Karimi, H. (2024). AI in English Higher Education: Balancing Innovation with Equity Challenges and Opportunities.

Kraml, M. (2024). ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM IN ADULT EDUCATION USING DISTANCE LEARNING FOR LEARNING PROGRAMMING. EPH-International Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 26–31.

McLeod, S. (2019). Constructivism as a theory for teaching and learning. Simply Psychology, 17.

Montecillo, Z. (2024). Constructivism: Philosophy and Psychology of a Pedagogy. Available at SSRN 4780863.

Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021a). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376.

Oliveira, G., Grenha Teixeira, J., Torres, A., & Morais, C. (2021b). An exploratory study on the emergency remote education experience of higher education students and teachers during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1357–1376.

Pizzi, M. A. (2014). Blended Learning Pedagogy: The Time is Now! Occupational Therapy In Health Care, 28(3), 333–338. https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2014.908479

Roe, B., Smith, S. H., & Burns, P. C. (2011). Teaching Reading in Today’s Elementary Schools. Cengage Learning.

Seifert, T. (2023). Fostering collaborative and constructivist learning through the flipped classroom during COVID-19. Journal of Educators Online, 20(2), n2.

Seminar, P., Hamzah, M. S., Hussain, M., Zainal, H., & Islam, P. (2011). أهمية تقنية sq3r في تغليم مهارة القراءة الفهمية. 414–423.

Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Online Submission, 7(4), 1–13.

Tracey, M. W. (2009). Design and development research: A model validation case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57(4), 553–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9075-0

Villanueva, J. A. R., Redmond, P., Galligan, L., & Eacersall, D. (2023). Investigating blended learning interactions in Philippine schools through the community of inquiry framework. Asia Pacific Education Review, 1–16.

Wang, J., & Li, G. (2024). Research and Analysis of Blended Teaching based on the Community of Inquiry Model. 2024 3rd International Conference on Humanities, Wisdom Education and Service Management (HWESM 2024), 562–570.

Wang, Y. (2024a). Discussion on Improving Students’ Independent Learning Ability in College English Flipped Class-room. The Educational Review, USA, 8(5), 714–718.

Wang, Y. (2024b). Discussion on Improving Students’ Independent Learning Ability in College English Flipped Class-room. The Educational Review, USA, 8(5), 714–718.

Wilson, D., & Smilanich, E. (2005). The other blended learning : a classroom-centered approach. 282.

Wulandari. (2013). Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning dengan Media Blog. Jurnal Teknologi, 1(1), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v56.60




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um056v8i1p112-136

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2024 Moch Wahib Dariyadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

AL-ARABI is indexed by:

        

Editorial Office:

Al-Arabi: Journal of Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language
Arabic Department, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)

Jalan Semarang 5, Malang 65145, Indonesia.

Telephone: (0341) 551312 Ext. 239. Fax (0341) 567475.
E-mail: alarabi@um.ac.id


Creative Commons License
Al-Arabi: Journal of Teaching Arabic as a Foreign Language is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/alarabi/