Pedagogical Review of Edulogy LMS: Case Study on Indonesian Educational System

Rizki Zakwandi, Jumadi Jumadi, Habibah Khusna Baihaqi, Ade Yeti Nuryantini

Abstract


Abstrak: Learning Management System (LMS) menjadi salah satu alternative pembelajaran yang memungkinkan guru dan siswa berinteraksi secara sistematis. Selain itu, LMS juga menggambarkan solusi digitaliasasi sistem pendidikan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis aspek pedagogis dalam LMS Edulogy. Metoda penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kasus pada dua dashboard LMS Edulogy yaitu dashboard wakil kepala bidang kurikulum dan dashboard guru. Selain itu, repon pengguna juga dikumpulkan melalui penyebaran angket kepada 144 guru dan 8 wakil kepala bidang kurikulum. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa LMS Edulogy cukup baik dalam memfasilitasi wakil kepala bidang kurikulum dan guru dalam menjalankan tugasnya. Sebanyak 64.44 persen tugas wakil kepala bidang kurikulum dan 60 persen tugas guru sudah terfasilitasi dalam LMS Edulogy. Secara keseluruhan, tingkat kepuasaan pada LMS Edulogy tergolong baik dimana 75 persen dari wakil kepala sekolah bidang kurikulum menyatakan puas dan 67.64 persen guru menyatakan puas. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat menjadi rujukan pengembangan berikutnya terkait LMS dan menjadi bahan pertimbangan untuk menggunakan LMS Edulogy.

 

Abstract: Learning Management System (LMS) was an alternative learning where teachers and students interacted systematically. Besides, LMS also described the digitalization solutions of the education system. This study aimed to analyze the pedagogical aspects of LMS Edulogy. The research meth-od used was a case study on two LMS Edulogy dashboards, namely the dashboard of the vice principal of curriculum and the dashboard of the teacher. In addition, user responses were also collected by distributing questionnaires to 144 teachers and 8 vice-principals of the curriculum. The results showed that the LMS Edulogy was quite good at facilitating the vice principal of the curriculum and teachers in carrying out their duties. As many as 64.44 percent of the duties of the vice principal of curriculum and 60 percent of the duties of the teachers have been facilitated in LMS Edulogy. Overall, the level of satisfaction at LMS Edulogy classified as good where 75 percent of the vice principal in the curriculum field are satisfied and 67.64 percent of the teachers were expressed satisfaction. The results of this study were expected to be a reference for the next development related to LMS and become a consideration for using LMS Edulogy.

 


Keywords


analisa pedagogi; system manajemen pembelajaran; edulogy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ambarwati, S. (2018). Analisis kinerja wakil kepala sekolah urusan kurikulum dalam mengimplementasikan kurikulum 2013 tingkat SMK negeri di kabupaten Klaten. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Antony, B. (2015). SCORM: A Solution for ICT-Based LMS Performance Enhancement. International Journal of Electronics Communication and Computer Engineering, 1(6), 146.

Aufa, S. R. (2020). Peran Wakil Sekolah Dalam Manajemen Kurikulum di Sekolah Inklusi SDN Banua Anyar 4 Banjarmasin. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/wzvs7

Bazeliuk, O. (2019). Peculiarities of digitalized learning process organisation in the learning management systems. Professional Pedagogy, 18(1), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.32835/2223-5752.2019.18.143-147

Berggren, A., Burgos, D., Fontana, J. M., Hinkelman, D., Hung, V., & Hursh, A. (2005). Practical and Pedagogical Issues for Teacher Adoption of IMS Learning Design Standards in Moodle LMS Abstract : Commentaries : 2005, 1–24.

Creswell, D., & Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA.

Dilson, Noviardi, Suhery, L., Asnur, H., Yunita, R., & Arimadona, S. (2020). Pelatihan peningkatan kompetensi guru MTsN 1 Kota Payakumbuh dalam pengembangan media pembelajaran terintegrasi TIK. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(4), 385–395. https://doi.org/10.31949/jb.v1i4.453

Emda, A. (2018). Kedudukan Motivasi Belajar Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran. Lantanida Journal, 5(2), 172. https://doi.org/10.22373/lj.v5i2.2838

Fahirah, Puteri, S. L. E., & Arnesia, P. D. (2020). Analisis Google Classroom Sebagai Sistem Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Saat Pandemi Covid-19 menggunakan Model Kesuksesan Sistem Informasi Delone dan McLean. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 4(September), 57–64.

Farianto, A., & Yudi Novianto, M. (2015). Perancangan Sistem Informasi Akademik Berbasis Web Pada Sma N 14 Muaro Jambi. Ilmiah Media SISFO, 08(2), 1–11.

Green, K. R., & Chewning, H. L. (2020). The Fault in our Systems : LMS as a Vehicle for Critical Pedagogy. 2023(MarketsandMarkets 2019).

Herdiansyah, E., & Cahyana, R. (2015). Pengembangan Aplikasi Penyusun Jadwal Pelajaran Secara Otomatis. Jurnal Algoritma, 12(2), 186–191. https://doi.org/10.33364/algoritma/v.12-2.186

Kemendikbud Republik Indonesia. (2019). Surat Edaran Nomor 14 2019 Tentang Penyederhanaan Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (p. 2).

Laohajaratsang, T. (2018). Designing Effective Pedagogical Approaches with Next-Generation LMS for Students in Higher Education Thanomporn Laohajaratsang Information Technology Service Center and Faculty of Education. THAITESOL Journal, 31(1), 1–20.

Larasati, N. A., & Andayani, S. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Learning Management System ( LMS ) Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Menggunakan Metode DeLone and McLean. 04, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.17605/jti.v4i1.506

Lisnawati, R. (2018). Fungsi Manajemen Kepala Sekolah, Motivasi, dan Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan (Teori Dan Praktik), 2(2), 143. https://doi.org/10.26740/jp.v2n2.p143-149

Maarif, S. (2017). Aplikasi pewarnaan titik pada graph dalam pembuatan jadwal pelajaran. Pi: Mathematics Education Journal, 1(1), 22–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21067/pmej.v1i1.2001

Maria, E., & Sediyono, E. (2017). Pengembangan Model Manajemen Pembelajaran Berbasis Tik Di Sekolah Dasar. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2017.v4.i1.p59-71

Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No 19 ,2017 Tentang Guru. In Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2017.

Mulyana, R., & Faqih, A. (2012). Standar Dokumen Administrasi Madrasah (pp. 152–153). Unit Pelaksana Program Akreditasi Madrasah (UPPAM) Direktorat Pendidikan Madrasah, Ditjen Pendidikan Islam Kementerian Agama RI.

Nasrulloh, I., & Ismail, A. (2018). Analisis Kebutuhan Pembelajaran Berbasis ICT. Jurnal Petik, 3(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v3i1.355

Omar, U., & Yaacob, A. (2020). The benefits of learning management system (LMS) in facilitating the TESL teacher trainees’ learning. Practitioner Reseacrh, 2, 103–119.

Paudi, S., & Suking, A. (2020). Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Kinerja Wakil Kepala Sekolah Menengah Pertama dilihat dari Tugas Pokok dan Fungsinya Performance of The Vice Principals of Junior High Schools Viewed from Their Main Duties. 2(2), 192–205.

Pickering, J. D., & Swinnerton, B. J. (2017). An Anatomy Massive Open Online Course as a Continuing Professional Development Tool for Healthcare Professionals. Medical Science Educator, 27(2), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0383-7

Sutrisna, O. (1987). Administrasi Pendidikan Dasar Teoritis Untuk Praktek Profesional (p. 38). Angkasa.

Teknologi, P. M. A. (2020). Edulogy Student. Edulogy Indonesia.

Tiawan, Tamsir, A., Nugroho, E. A., & Kurnia, D. (2020). Webinar Penggunaan Moodle sebagai Media E-Learning Guru-Guru di Jawa Barat. BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(4), 500–505. https://doi.org/10.31949/jb.v1i4.418

Tujni, B., & Syakti, F. (2019). Implementasi Sistem Usability Scale Dalam Evaluasi Perspektif Pengguna Terhadap Sistem Informasi Akademik Berbasis Mobile. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, 11(3), 241–251.

Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Doll, W., Deng, X., & Williams, M. (2018). The impact of organisational support, technical support, and self-efficacy on faculty perceived benefits of using learning management system. Behaviour and Information Technology, 37(4), 311–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2018.1436590




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um039v7i12022p010

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Rizki Zakwandi, Jumadi Jumadi, Habibah Khusna Baihaqi, Ade Yeti Nuryantini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan published by Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, State University of Malang in Collaboration with Asosiasi Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan Indonesia (APS TPI) and Ikatan Profesi Teknologi Pendidikan Indonesia (IPTPI) with MoU.

Publisher Address:
Lab. Teknologi Pendidikan, Gd.E2, Lt.1
Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang
Jalan Semarang No 5, Kota Malang Kode Pos 65145
Email: edcomtech.fip@um.ac.id

 

========================================================================================================

INDEXED BYTOOLSPLAGIARISM CHECKARTICLE TEMPLATE


Creative Commons License
Edcomtech is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Edcomtech Statistics (Since July 13th, 2020)

View My Stats