Pemanfaatan Teknologi Asistif Dalam Pendidikan Inklusif
Abstract
Abstrak: Berbagai jenis teknologi menawarkan dukungan yang diperlukan bagi siswa penyandang disabilitas untuk dapat belajar bersama dengan anak normal dalam kelas inklusif. Penggunaan teknologi asistif (TA) dapat dimanfaatkan siswa dengan disabilitas menciptakan kemandirian dan kepercayaan diri ketika belajar bersama dengan anak normal. Penelitian ini menggunakan Analisis artikel dengan metode descriptive content analysis untuk menjelaskan peran TA dalam kelas inklusif. Kata kunci yang digunakan untuk mencari artikel “technology assistive”, “inclusive”, dan “education. Berdasarkan hasil pencarian artikel yang diperoleh dari berbagai situs jurnal antara lain; Google Scholar, Directory Of Open Access Jurnals, Scopus, Emerald, Dan Taylor Francis terpilihlah empat puluh tiga artikel penelitian terkait penggunaan TA dalam kelas Inklusif yang akan dianalisis. Penelitian ini menemukan TA terdiri dari serangkaian perangkat dan layanan yang berfungsi untuk mendukung siswa untuk meningkatkan kemampuan yang ada, mengimbangi atau mengurangi hambatan yang mungkin terjadi. Beberapa TA dikembangkan untuk penggunaan fungsional, sementara fungsi lainnya dapat menciptakan interaksi sosial, hingga akses kurikulum. Penggunaan TA dalam kelas inklusif secara universal meningkatkan inklusivitas dalam kelas.
Abstract: Various types of technology offer the necessary support for students with disabilities to study together with normal children in inclusive classes. Students can utilize assistive technology (AT) with disabilities to create independence and confidence when studying with normal children. This study uses article analysis with descriptive content analysis method to explain the role of AT in inclusive classes. The keywords used to search for the articles are “technology assistive,” “inclusion,” and “education. The search results of articles obtained from various journal sites, among others, Google Scholar, Directory Of Open Access Journals, Scopus, Emerald, and Taylor Francis selected forty-three research articles related to the use of AT in Inclusive classrooms to be analyzed. This study found that AT consists of tools and services that support students to improve existing abilities and offset or reduce barriers that may occur. Some TAs are developed for practical use, while other functions can create social interaction to curriculum access. The use of TA in inclusive classrooms universally increases inclusivity in the classroom.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alkahtani, K. D. (2013). Teachers’ knowledge and use of assistive technology for students with special educational needs. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(2), 65–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jse.v3i2.3424
Alnahdi, G. (2014). Assistive Technology in Special Education and the Universal Design for Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 13(2), 18–23.
Beal, C. R., & Rosenblum, L. P. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tablet computer application (App) in helping students with visual impairments solve mathematics problems. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200102
Berlach, R. G., & Chambers, D. J. (2011). Interpreting inclusivity: An endeavour of great proportions. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15(5), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603110903159300
Bouck, E. C., Park, J., & Stenzel, K. (2020). Virtual manipulatives as assistive technology to support students with disabilities with mathematics. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 64(4), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2020.1762157
Bryant, D. P., & Bryant, B. R. (2012). Assistive technology for people with disabilities (2nd ed). Boston: Pearson.
Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074
Cascales-Martínez, A., Martínez-Segura, M.-J., Pérez-López, D., & Contero, M. (2016). Using an augmented reality enhanced tabletop system to promote learning of mathematics: A case study with students with special educational needs. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00621a
Chambers, D. (2019). Assistive technology to enhance inclusive education. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.
Cooke, A., Smith, D., & Booth, A. (2012). Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qualitative Health Research, 22(10), 1435–1443. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732312452938
Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2013). Improved Lesson Planning With Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 36(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406412446178
Dell, A. G., Newton, D. A., & Petroff, J. G. (2012). Assistive technology in the classroom: Enhancing the school experiences of students with disabilities. Pearson Boston, MA.
Eliçin, Ö., & Kaya, A. (2017). Determining studies conducted upon individuals with autism spectrum disorder using high-tech devices. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.1.0236
Federici, S., & Borsci, S. (2016). Providing assistive technology in Italy: The perceived delivery process quality as affecting abandonment. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2014.930191
Fidan, A., Cihan, H., & Özbey, F. (2014). An Important Component in Successful Inclusion Practices: Instructional Adaptations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4894–4898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1045
Forlin, C., & Chambers, D. (2017). Catering for diversity: Including learners with different abilities and needs in regular classrooms. In Life in schools and classrooms (pp. 555–571). Springer.
Hall, T. E., Cohen, N., Vue, G., & Ganley, P. (2015). Addressing Learning Disabilities With UDL and Technology: Strategic Reader. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38(2), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948714544375
Heijkers, J., Schoonbrood, F. J. E., & de Witte, L. P. (2011). Supporting autonomy in the aging population by using low tech assistive devices. In Everyday Technology for Independence and Care (pp. 20–25). IOS Press.
Ismaili, J. (2017). Mobile learning as alternative to assistive technology devices for special needs students. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 883–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9462-9
Jadhav, V., Chambers, D., & Tatpuje, D. (2020). Low-tech Assistive Technology to Support Students with Disability in Low-income Countries. In Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education. Emerald Publishing Limited.
Jakovljevic, M., & Buckley, S. (2011). Assistive technologies in a workplace environment: Barriers for the employment of persons with disabilities.
Katz, J. (2013). The Three Block Model of Universal Design for Learning (UDL): Engaging students in inclusive education. Canadian Journal of Education / Revue Canadienne de l’éducation, 36(1), 153–194. JSTOR. Retrieved from JSTOR.
Kelly, S. M., & Smith, D. W. (2011). The Impact of Assistive Technology on the Educational Performance of Students with Visual Impairments: A Synthesis of the Research. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 105(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1110500205
Kemendikbud Ajak Daerah Tingkatkan Pendidikan Inklusif. (2019, July 15). Retrieved August 21, 2021, from Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi website: https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2019/07/kemendikbud-ajak-daerah-tingkatkan-pendidikan-inklusif
King-Sears, M. E., & Evmenova, A. S. (2007). Premises, principles, and processes for integrating technology into instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children, 40(1), 6–14.
Knight, V. F., Spooner, F., Browder, D. M., Smith, B. R., & Wood, C. L. (2013). Using systematic instruction and graphic organizers to teach science concepts to students with autism spectrum disorders and intellectual disability. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 28(2), 115–126.
Koch, K. (2017). Stay in the box! Embedded assistive technology improves access for students with disabilities. Education Sciences, 7(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7040082
Kochung, E. J. (2011). Role of higher education in promoting inclusive education: Kenyan perspective. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 2(3), 144–149.
Magana, S. (2017). Disruptive classroom technologies: A framework for innovation in education. Corwin Press.
Masters, G. (2018). The role of evidence in teaching and learning.
Mavrou, K. (2011). Assistive technology as an emerging policy and practice: Processes, challenges and future directions. Technology and Disability, 23(1), 41–52.
Morash-Macneil, V., Johnson, F., & Ryan, J. B. (2018). A Systematic Review of Assistive Technology for Individuals With Intellectual Disability in the Workplace. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417729166
Mu, G. M., Hu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Building resilience of students with disabilities in China: The role of inclusive education teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 125–134.
Munirah, F. (2015). Analisis Isi Deskriptif Rubrik “Xp Re Si” Harian Kaltim Post Periode Maret-April 2013. EJurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 3(1), 186–197.
Ndaumanu, F. (2020). Hak Penyandang Disabilitas: Antara Tanggung Jawab dan Pelaksanaan oleh Pemerintah Daerah. Jurnal HAM, 11(1), 131–150.
Obiakor, F. E., Bakken, J. P., & Rotatori, A. F. (Eds.). (2010). Current issues and trends in special education: Research, technology, and teacher preparation. Bingley: Emerald.
Patterson, K. B., & Cavanaugh, T. (2020). Assistive technology in the transition education process. In Handbook of Adolescent Transition Education for Youth with Disabilities (pp. 236–248). Routledge.
Plos, O., Buisine, S., Aoussat, A., Mantelet, F., & Dumas, C. (2012). A Universalist strategy for the design of Assistive Technology. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 42(6), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2012.09.003
Rentenbach, B., Prislovsky, L., & Gabriel, R. (2017). Valuing differences: Neurodiversity in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 98(8), 59–63.
Sari Rudiyati, M. P. (2011). Potret Sekolah Inklusif di Indonesia.
Schaaf, D. N. (2018). Assistive technology instruction in teacher professional development. Journal of Special Education Technology, 33(3), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417753561
Scherer, M. J. (2019). Assistive technology selection to outcome assessment: The benefit of having a service delivery protocol. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1664649
Schmitt, A. J., McCallum, E., Hennessey, J., Lovelace, T., & Hawkins, R. O. (2012). Use of reading pen assistive technology to accommodate post-secondary students with reading disabilities. Assistive Technology, 24(4), 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2012.659956
Sharma, F. R., & Wasson, S. G. (2012). Speech recognition and synthesis tool: Assistive technology for physically disabled persons. International Journal of Computer Science and Telecommunications, 3(4), 86–91.
Shaw, A. (2016). Low tech tools of empowerment: Accessing curriculum through assistive technology. The Exceptional Parent, 46(6), 40–42.
Sherry, M., Ravneberg, B., & Söderström, S. (2017). Disability, society and assistive technology. Routledge.
Smith, C., & Hattingh, M. J. (2020). Assistive Technologies for Students with Dyslexia: A Systematic Literature Review. International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning, 504–513. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63885-6_55
Surya, E., & Putri, F. A. (2017). Improving mathematical problem-solving ability and self-confidence of high school students through contextual learning model. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 85–94.
Thapliyal, M., & Ahuja, N. J. (2021). Underpinning implications of instructional strategies on assistive technology for learning disability: A meta-synthesis review. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2020.1864669
UDL: The UDL Guidelines. (n.d.). Retrieved August 26, 2021, from https://udlguidelines.cast.org/
Van Niekerk, K., Dada, S., & Tönsing, K. (2019). Influences on selection of assistive technology for young children in South Africa: Perspectives from rehabilitation professionals. Disability and Rehabilitation, 41(8), 912–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1416500
Visagie, S., Eide, A. H., Mannan, H., Schneider, M., Swartz, L., Mji, G., … Hem, K.-G. (2017). A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(7), 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2016.1244293
WHO. (2018). Assistive technology. Retrieved February 13, 2021, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology
Wong, M. E. (2018). Guiding teachers of students with visual impairments to make assistive technology decisions: Preliminary experience using the Wisconsin assistive technology initiative. Support for Learning, 33(4), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12228
Young, M. C., & Courtad, C. A. (2016). Inclusion and Students with Learning Disabilities. In J. P. Bakken & F. E. Obiakor (Eds.), Advances in Special Education (Vol. 31, pp. 13–29). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0270-401320160000031002
Zabala, J. S. (2020). The SETT Framework: A Model for Selection and Use of Assistive Technology Tools and More. In Assistive Technology to Support Inclusive Education. Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-363620200000014005
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um039v7i12022p055
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Bayu Widyaswara Suwahyo, Punaji Setyosari, Henry Praherdhiono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan published by Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, State University of Malang in Collaboration with Asosiasi Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan Indonesia (APS TPI) and Ikatan Profesi Teknologi Pendidikan Indonesia (IPTPI) with MoU.
Publisher Address:
Lab. Teknologi Pendidikan, Gd.E2, Lt.1
Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang
Jalan Semarang No 5, Kota Malang Kode Pos 65145
Email: edcomtech.fip@um.ac.id
========================================================================================================
INDEXED BY | TOOLS | PLAGIARISM CHECK | ARTICLE TEMPLATE |
Edcomtech is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Edcomtech Statistics (Since July 13th, 2020)