Email this article 
HERMENEUTIKA GADAMERIAN UNTUK MEMAHAMI KUALITAS AUDIT (PEMERIKSAAN KEUANGAN) BPK RI
Abstract
This research aim is to get an understanding of the financial audit quality of BPK RI by interpretative paradigm approach and Gadamer’s Hermeneutics as technical data analysis (text). The data (text) has shown that BPK RI still has low financial audit quality whereas people of Indonesia (as stakeholders) have expectation for high financial audit quality. Conversely, BPK RI has claimed for having high financial audit quality. Financial audit quality of BPK RI measured based on compliance of audit practice with the code of ethics and auditing standards. The results showed that the financial audit quality of the BPK RI is not in accordance with the claims, which can be observed from non-compliance with the code of ethics and auditing standards.
Keywords:
Audit quality, The Audit Board of The Republic Indonesia, Gadamer's Hermeneutics
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alim, M.N., Hapsari, T. & Purwanti, L., 2007. Pengaruh kompetensi dan independensi terhadap kualitas audit dengan etika auditor sebagai variabel moderasi. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi X, (8), pp.1–26.
Alleyne, P. & Howard, M., 2005. An Exploratory Study of Auditors Responsibility for Fraud Detection in Barbados. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(3), pp.284–303.
antaranews.com, 2014. BPK : Opini WTP Tidak Jamin Tidak Ada Korupsi. antaranewes.com. Tersedia di: http://www.antaranews.com/print/265960/bpk?opini?wtp?tidak?jamin?tidak? ada?korupsi (Diakses pada 13 Agustus 2016).
Beasley, M.S. et al., 2013. An Analysis of Alleged Auditor Deficiencies in SEC Fraud Investigations: 1998 – 2010. Center for Audit Quality.
BPK RI, 2011. Siaran Pers: Opini WTP Tidak Menjamin Tidak Ada Korupsi. Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. Tersedia di: http://www. bpk.go.id/news/opini-wtp-tidak-menjamin-tidak-ada-korupsi.
BPK RI, 2015a. BPK Lakukan Pemeriksaan Keuangan Sesuai Dengan Standar Yang Berlaku. Tersedia di: http://www.bpk.go.id/news/bpklakukanpemeriksaankeuangansesuaidenganstan daryangberlaku
BPK RI, 2015b. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester (IHPS) 1 Tahun 2015.
BPK RI, 2016. Ikhtisar Hasil Pemeriksaan Semester (IHPS) 2 Tahun 2015.
Burrel, G., dan Morgan, G. 2005. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of The Sociology of Corporate Life. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing Limited.detik.com, 2015. Ini Mungkin Bukti Ahok , Predikat WTP dari BPK Tak Jamin Bebas Korupsi. Tersedia di : http://news.detik.com/berita/2962959/inimungkinbuktiahokpredi katwtpdaribpktakjaminbebaskorupsi.
Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, R.H. & McGrath, N.T., 1992. Audit Quality Attributes: The Perceptions of Audit Partners, Preparers, and Financial Statement Users. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 11 (January).
Chua, W. F. 1986. Radical Development in Accounting Thought. The Accounting Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, 601 – 632.
DeAngelo, L.E., 1981. Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), pp.183–199.
Deis, D.R. & Giroux, G.A., 1992. Determinants of Audit Quality in the Public Sector. The Accounting Review, 67(3), pp.462–479.
Fadzly, M.N. & Ahmad, Z., 2004. Audit Expectation Gap: The Case of Malaysia. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19(7), pp.897–915.
Francis, J.R., 2004. What Do We Know About Audit Quality? British Accounting Review, 36(4), pp.345–368.
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, 2010. Kebenaran dan Metode (Judul Asli: Truth and Method). Diterjemahkan oleh: Ahmad Sahidah. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.
Lin, Z.J. & Chen, F., 2004. An Empirical Study of Audit “Expectation Gap” in The People’s Republic of China. International Journal of Auditing, 115, pp.93–115.
Mak, T. dkk., 2005. Audit, Accountability and an aAuditor’s Ethical Dilemma: A Case Study of HIH Insurance. Asian Review of Accounting, 13(2), pp.18–35.
Manullang, A., 2010. Pengaruh Tekanan Anggaran Waktu dan Risiko Kesalahan Terhadap Penurunan Kualitas Audit. Fokus Ekonomi, 5(1), pp.81 – 94.
Mardisar, D. & Sari, R. N., 2007. Pengaruh Akuntabilitas dan Pengetahuan Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Kerja Auditor. Simposium nasional akuntansi X.
Martens, S.C. & McEnroe, J.E., 1992. Substance over form in auditing and the auditor’s position of public trust. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 3(4), pp.389–401.
Martinis, M.R. De & Burrowes, A.W., 1996. Materiality and Risk Judgements: A Review of Users’ Expectations. Managerial Finance, 22(9), pp.16–34.
Mohamed, D.M. & Habib, M.H., 2013. Auditor independence, audit quality and the mandatory auditor rotation in Egypt. Emerald Insight, 6(2), pp.116–144.
Moleong, Lexy J. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
okezone.com, 2016. BPK : Opini Wajar Tanpa Pengecualian Bukan Berarti Bebas Korupsi. okezone.com. Tersedia di: http://news.okezone.com/read/2016/08/11/340/1461439/bpk? opini?wajar?tanpa?pengecualian?bukan?berarti?bebas?korupsi.Diakses pada 13 Agustus 2016).
Omoteso, K. & Obalola, M., 2014. The Role of Auditing in the Management of Corporate Fraud. Ethics, Governance and Corporate Crime: Challenges and Consequences, (October), pp.129 – 151.
Pearson, M.A., 1987. Auditor Independence Deficiencies & Alleged Audit Failures. Journal of Business Ethics, 6(4), pp.281–287.
Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 01 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara
Poespoprodjo, W., 1987. Interpretasi. Bandung. Remadja Karya.
Porter, B., 1993. An Empirical Study of the Audit Expectation-Performance Gap. Accounting and Business Research, 24(93), pp.49–68.
Rahardjo, M., 2010. Hermeneutika Gadamerian: Kuasa Bahasa dalam Wacana Politik Gus Dur. Malang. UIN-MALIKI Press.
Riahi-Belkaoui, Ahmed. 2007. Teori Akuntansi (Edisi 5 – Buku 2). Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Setyaningrum, D., 2012. Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kualitas audit BPK RI. Jurnal akuntansi, 1, pp.1–24.
Steckel, R., Manry, D. & Tritschler, J., 2014. Audit Quality: Association between Published Reporting Errors and Audit Firm Characteristics. Springer Gabler.
Sukriyah, I., Akram & Inapty, B.A., 2009. Pengaruh Pengalaman Kerja, Independensi, Obyektifitas, Integritas dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Pemeriksaan Oleh: Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XII, pp.1–38.
Sumaryono, E., 1999. Hermeneutik: Sebuah Metode Filsafat. Yogyakarta. Kanisius.
tempo.co, 2014. Korupsi Al-Qur’an, Jauhari divonis 8 tahun penjara. Tersedia di: https://nasional.tempo.co/read/news/2014/04/10/063569710/korupsi-al-quran-jauhari-divonis-8-tahun-penjara.
tempo.co, 2015. Korupsi Haji, Suryadharma Didakwa Rugikan Negara Rp27M. Tersedia di: https://nasional.tempo.co/read/newas/2015/08/31/063696598/korupsi-haji-suryadharma-dida kwa-rugikan-negara-rp-27-m.
Transparency International Indonesia, 2016. Corruption Perception Index 2015. Tersedia: http://www.ti.or.id/index.php/publication/2016/01/27/corruption-perceptions-index-2015.
Tuanakotta, Theodorus M., 2011. Berpikir Kritis dalam Auditing. Jakarta. Salemba Empat.
Tuanakotta, Theodorus M., 2015. Audit Kontemporer. Jakarta. Salemba Empat.
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemeberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2006 tentang Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan.
Watkins, A.L., Hillison, W. & Morecroft, S.E., 2004. Audit Quality: a Synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 23, p.153.
Yin, R. K., 2015. Studi Kasus: Desain dan Metode. Depok. Rajagrafindo Persada.
Yuliati, R., Winarna, J. & Setiawan, D., 2007. Expectation Gap antara Pemakai Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah dan Auditor Pemerintah. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi IX, pp.1 – 25.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um004v5i12018p031
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual is indexed by:
