Does Student Satisfaction Mediate the Correlation between E-learning Service Quality, Academic Engagement and Academic Achievement?

Jumaroh Ratna Satuti, Sunaryanto Sunaryanto, Dudung Ma'ruf Nuris


This research aimed at analyzing the influence of e-learning service quality and academic engagement on academic achievement through student satisfaction as an intervening variable. Only students who had ever used e-learning service could be the research sample and 222 students were sampled using purposive sampling. The data were collected by distributing questionnaire to the research samples. The data were analyzed using path analysis technique. The result indicated that e-learning service quality, academic engagement, and student satisfaction had an influence on accounting students’ academic achievement. From this research finding, it was suggested that university lecturers keep on developing teaching and learning strategies which can improve students’ academic engagement since it has been proven that academic engagement has a dominant influence on students’ academic achievement.


E-learning Service Quality, Academic Engagement, Student satisfaction, Academic Achievement

Full Text:



Abdel-Jaber, H. (2017). Experimental Analysis of Students’ Satisfaction Factors in E-Learning Environment: A Case Study on Saudi Arabian University. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 16(2), 1–21.

Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., Masa’deh, R., & Sinclair, J. (2020). Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 102(June 2019), 67–86.

Al-rahmi, W., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Alzahrani, A. I., Saged, A. L. I. A. L. I., Shamsiah, N. U. R., & Rahman, A. (2018). Use of E-Learning by University Students in Malaysian Higher Educational Institutions : A Case in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Appleton-Knapp, S. L., & Krentler, K. A. (2006). Measuring student expectations and their effects on satisfaction: The importance of managing student expectations. Journal of Marketing Education, 28(3), 254–264.

Arhar, J. M., & Kromrey, J. D. (1993). Interdisciplinary Teaming in the Middle Level School: Creating a Sense of Belonging for At-Risk Middle Level Students.

Assunção, H., Lin, S., Sit, P., Cheung, K., Harju-luukkainen, H., Smith, T., Maloa, B., Álvares, J., Bonini, D., Ilic, I. S., Esposito, G., Francesca, F. M., & Marôco, J. (2020). University Student Engagement Inventory ( USEI ): Transcultural Validity Evidence Across Four Continents. 10(January), 1–12.

Billiger, D. U & Martindale, T. (2004). Key Factors for Determining Student Satisfaction in. International Journal on E-Learning, March, 61–67.

Brown, S., White, S., Bowmar, A., & Power, N. (2017). Student engagement in a compulsory introductory physiology course. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(1), 52–62.

Cheong, K. C., & Ong, B. (2016). Assessment for Learning Within and Beyond the Classroom. Assessment for Learning Within and Beyond the Classroom.

Dehghan, A., Dugger, J., Dobrzykowski, D., & Balazs, A. (2014). The antecedents of student loyalty in online programs. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(1), 15–35.

Elliott, K.M. and Healy, M. . (2001). The development of a conceptual model of student satisfaction with their experience in higher education. תיאוריה וביקורת , 30: 189-212, 2007, December 2014, 37–41.

Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. J. (2018). A System ’ s View of E-Learning Success Model. 16(1), 42–76.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom Belonging among Early Adolescent Students: Relationships to Motivation and Achievement. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 13(1), 21–43.

Internet, T., Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. (2018). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments : A systematic review. September.

Jesús Martínez-Argüelles, M., Blanco, M., & Castán, J. M. (2013). Dimensions of Perceived Service Quality… Palabras clave Dimensions of Perceived Service Quality…. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC). UOC, 10(1), 268–285.>

Kasmin, K., & Hii, P. K. (2017). Je-LKS. 13, 117–128.

Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H. D. (2019). The roles of academic engagement and digital readiness in students’ achievements in university e-learning environments. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1).

Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.

Kuh, G. D. (2003). What We’re Learning About Student Engagement From NSSE: Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32.

Kuo, Y., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Internet and Higher Education Interaction , Internet self-ef fi cacy , and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50.

Lee, J. W. (2010). Online support service quality, online learning acceptance, and student satisfaction. Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 277–283.

Lee, S. J., Srinivasan, S., Trail, T., Lewis, D., & Lopez, S. (2011). Examining the relationship among student perception of support, course satisfaction, and learning outcomes in online learning. Internet and Higher Education, 14(3), 158–163.

Lee, V. E. (1995). Another Look at High School Restructuring: More Evidence that It Improves Student Achievement and More Insight into Why. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 9(Fall), 1–10.

Levy, Y. (2007). Comparing dropouts and persistence in e-learning courses. Computers and Education, 48(2), 185–204.

Lin, S. H., & Huang, Y. C. (2018). Assessing College Student Engagement: Development and Validation of the Student Course Engagement Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(7), 694–708.

López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers and Education, 56(3), 818–826.

Loya, K. I. (2014). Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action by Vincent Tinto. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012. 228 pp., $27.40 (cloth). . American Journal of Education, 120(4), 601–604.

Lyons, T., & Evans, M. M. (2013). Blended Learning to Increase Student Satisfaction: An Exploratory Study. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 18(1), 43–53.

Martínez-Argüelles, M. J., & Batalla-Busquet, J. M. (2016). Perceived service quality and student loyalty in an online university. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 17(4), 264–279.

Masrom, M., Zainon, O., & Rahiman, R. (2008). Critical Success in E-learning: An Examination of Technological and Institutional Support Factors *. International Journal of Cyber Society and Education Pages, 1(2), 131–142.

Miralles-armenteros, S., Chiva-gómez, R., Rodríguez-sánchez, A., Barghouti, Z., Chiva-gómez, R., Rodríguez-, A., & Miralles-armenteros, S. (2019). Mindfulness and academic performance : The role of compassion and engagement compassion and engagement. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 00(00), 1–11.

Moore, C., & Shulock, N. (2009). Student progress toward degree completion: Lessons learned from the research literature. Institute for Higher Education Leadership & Policy, September, 1–20.

Mounts, N. S., & Steinberg, L. (1995). An Ecological Analysis of Peer Influence on Adolescent Grade Point Average and Drug Use. Developmental Psychology, 31(6), 915–922.

Mtebe, J. S., & Raphael, C. (2018). Key factors in learners ’ satisfaction with the e-learning system at the University of Dar es Salaam , Tanzania. 34(4), 107–122.

Navarro, R. L., Flores, L. Y., Legerski, J., Brionez, J., May, S. F., Suh, H. N., Slivensky, D. R., Tapio, F., Lee, H., Garriott, P. O., Hunt, H. K., Desjarlais, C. D., & Lee, B. (2018). Journal of Counseling Psychology.

Paechter, M., Maier, B., & Macher, D. (2010). Computers & Education Students ’ expectations of , and experiences in e-learning : Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. 54, 222–229.

Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Bui, T. K., Nguyen, H. T., & Pham, H. T. (2019). Does e-learning service quality influence e-learning student satisfaction and loyalty? Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1).

Pham, L., Williamson, S., & Berry, R. (2018). Student Perceptions of E-Learning Service. 14(3), 19–40.

Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. kuei. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers and Education, 47(2), 222–244.

Roderick, M., & Engel, M. (2001). The grasshopper and the ant: Motivational responses of low-achieving students to high-stakes testing. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(3), 197–227.

Roffe, I. (2002). E-learning: Engagement, enhancement and execution. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(1), 40–50.

Saadé, R. G., Morin, D., & Thomas, J. D. E. (2012). Critical thinking in E-learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1608–1617.

Santos, J., & Santos, J. (2003). Managing Service Quality Emerald Article : E-service quality : a model of virtual service quality dimensions E-service quality : a model of virtual service quality dimensions.

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers and Education, 128, 13–35.

Selim, H. M. (2007). Critical success factors for e-learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models. Computers and Education, 49(2), 396–413.

Shahsavar, T., & Sudzina, F. (2017). Student satisfaction and loyalty in Denmark : Application of EPSI methodology. page 19, 1–18.

Sinval, J., Casanova, J. R., Marôco, J., & Almeida, L. S. (2018). University student engagement inventory ( USEI ): Psychometric properties. 2.

steinmayr2014. (n.d.).


Voelkl, K. E. (1995). School warmth, student participation, and achievement. Journal of Experimental Education, 63(2), 127–138.

Webber, K. L., Krylow, R. B., & Zhang, Q. (2013). Does involvement really matter? Indicators of college student success and satisfaction. Journal of College Student Development, 54(6), 591–611.

Zhao, Y., Bandyopadhyay, K., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2019). What Matters Most in Online SAP-Enabled Course Learning ? A System View of Determinants. 6, 7583–7591.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Jumaroh Ratna Satuti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This Journal Indexed by:



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.