The Remote Audit and Information Technology: The impact of Covid-19 Pandemics

Trinandari Prasetyo Nugrahanti, Arvega Safina Pratiwi

Abstract


This study aimed to examine the effect of remote auditing and information technology on audit quality and professional ethics as moderating variables. It used a quantitative method with primary data obtained using a questionnaire. This research uses quantitative methods with primary data obtained through a questionnaire. This research population is auditors working in Public Accounting Firms around DKI Jakarta Province, Indonesia. A sample of 122 respondents was selected from the people using the convenience sampling technique. The results showed that remote auditing and information technology affected audit quality. Auditors work professionally by complying with audit standards to improve the quality of the results. Using information technology with computer-assisted audit techniques appropriately facilitates the auditors' process. The technology also makes data storage more effective and efficient, promoting quality audit work. Auditors should comply with professional ethics appropriate to the code of ethics of the public accounting profession.


Keywords


Remote audit; information technology; professional ethics; audit quality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ashari, H., & Nugrahanti, T. P. (2021). Household economy challenges in fulfilling life needs during the Covid-19 pandemic. Global Business and Economics Review, 25(1), 21-39.

Albitar, K., Gerged, A. M., Kikhia, H., & Hussainey, K. (2020). Auditing in times of social distancing: The effect of COVID-19 on auditing quality. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management.

Arens, A., Elder, R., Beasley, M., & Hogan, C. (2017). Auditing and Assurance Services, Global Edition, 16/E

Castka, P., Searcy, C., & Fischer, S. (2020). Technology-enhanced auditing in voluntary sustainability standards: The impact of COVID-19. Sustainability, 12(11), 4740.

De Angelo, L.E (1981). Auditor Size and Audit Quality. Journal of Accounting & Economics 3 183- 199. North Holland Publish Company.

Deloite. (2020). Potential implications of COVID-19 for the insurance sector. Accessed on the 27th of April 2020 at https://www2.deloitte.com/uk/en/insights/economy/covid19/impact-of-covid-19-on-insurers.html

Francis, J. R. (2011). "A Framework for Understanding and Researching Audit Quality ."Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Vol. 30 No. 2, pp. 125–152.

FRC. (2020) Guidance on Audit Issues Arising from the Covid-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic. 2020. https://www.frc.org.uk/news/march-2020-(1)/guidance-on-audit-issues-arising from-the-COVID-19.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program SPSS 25 (9th ed.). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro

Goodell W. J. (2020). “COVID-19 and finance: Agendas for future research”. Finance Research Letters. In press. http://conference.um.ac.id/index.php/nsafe/article/view/810

Hashem, B., & Sujud, H. (2020). The Impact of using iT on the Quality of Auditing in Lebanon. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, (178).

Hall, J. A. (2015). Information technology auditing. Cengage Learning.

Heider, F., & Weiner, B. (2002). Attribution theory. The Motivation Handbook, 31.

IESBA (2018). Handbook of the International Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants [online] Available at: https://www.ethicsboard.org/iesba-code

IAPI. (2020). Kode Etik Profesi Akuntan Publik. Jakarta: Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. https://iapi.or.id/uploads/article /38- KODE_ETIK_PROFESI_AK UNTAN_PUBLIK_2020.pdf

Litzenberg, R., & Ramirez, C. F. (2020). Proses Audit Jarak Jauh Selama Dan Setelah Covid-19: Implikasi Jangka Pendek dan Panjang. The Institute of Internal Auditor, 2–9. https://na.theiia.org/translations/PublicDocuments/EHSKB-Remote-Auditing-for-COVID-19-and-Beyond-Indonesian.pdf

KPMG.(2020). “COVID-19: Potential impact on financial reporting” Accessed on the 27th of April 2020 at https://home.kpmg/xx/en/home/insights/2020/03/covid-19-financial-reportingresource-centre.html

KPMG. (2021). Remote Auditing for Internal Auditors. Available at: www.KPMG.com

Murfadila, M., & Ramdani, M. R. (2019). Pengaruh Teknologi Informasi, Teknik Audit, Tekanan Anggaran Waktu Terhadap Kualitas Hasil Audit. AkMen Jurnal Ilmiah, 16(1), 133–144. https://e-jurnal.stienobel-indonesia.ac.id/index.php/akmen/article/view/627/616

Magablih, Ali Mustafa. (2019). Impact of Using Technology in Auditing on Reducing the Fees of Auditors Offices and Companies in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Management. 14(8): 1-9.

Nezhyva, M., & Miniailo, V. (2020). Digitalization of audit in the conditions of the COVID-19. Vestnik of Kiev National University of Trade and Economics Audit, 3, 123-134.

Nugrahanti, T. P., & Jahja, A. S. (2018). Audit judgment performance: The effect of performance incentives, obedience pressures, and ethical perceptions. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 6(3), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.5890/JEAM.2018.09.004

Omonuk, J. B., & Oni, A. A. (2015). Computer-assisted audit techniques and audit quality in developing countries: Evidence from Nigeria. The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 20(3).

Prabhawanti, P. P., & Widhiyani, N. L. S. (2018). Pengaruh Besaran Fee Audit dan Independensi Terhadap Kualitas Audit dan Etika Profesi Auditor Sebagai Moderasi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 24, 2247. https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2018.v24.i03.p23

PP Nomor 8 Tahun 2018 panduan tentang indikator kualitas audit KAP.

PWC. (2020). “COVID-19: Responding to the business impacts of Coronavirus”. Accessed on the 27th of April 2020 at https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/crisis-solutions/covid19.html

Siew, E. G., Rosli, K., & Yeow, P. H. (2020). Organizational and environmental influences in the adoption of computer-assisted audit tools and techniques (CAATTs) by audit firms in Malaysia. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 36, 100445.

Standar Audit (SA) 315 (Revisi 2021): Pengidentifikasian dan Penilaian Risiko Kesalahan Penyajian Material Melalui Pemahaman atas Entitas dan Lingkungannya, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 330 (Revisi 2021): Respons Auditor terhadap Risiko yang Telah Dinilai, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 501 (Revisi 2021): Bukti Audit – Pertimbangan Spesifik atas Unsur Pilihan, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 540 (Revisi 2021): Audit atas Estimasi Akuntansi, Termasuk Estimasi Akuntansi Nilai Wajar, dan Pengungkapan yang Bersangkutan, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 560 (Revisi 2021): Peristiwa Kemudian, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 570 (Revisi 2021): Kelangsungan Usaha, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 600 (Revisi 2021): Pertimbangan Khusus Audit atas Laporan Keuangan Grup (Termasuk Pekerjaan Auditor Komponen), Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 700 (Revisi 2021): Perumusan Suatu Opini dan Pelaporan atas Laporan Keuangan, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 705 (Revisi 2021): Modifikasi terhadap Opini dalam Laporan Auditor Independen, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Standar Audit (SA) SA 720 (Revisi 2021): Tanggung Jawab Auditor atas Informasi Lain dalam Dokumen yang Berisi Laporan Keuangan Auditan, Standar Profesional Akuntan Publik (SPAP), Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia (IAPI).

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Tarek, Menak and Basuony, Mohamed. (2017). The Implication of Information Technology on the Audit Profession in Developing Country: Extent of Use and Perceived Importance. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management. 25(2): 237-255.

Teeter, R. A., Alles, M. G., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2010). The remote audit. Journal of emerging technologies in accounting, 7(1), 73-88.

Vasarhelyi, Miklos. A and Romero, Silvia. (2014). Technology in Audit Engagements: A Case Research.Managerial Auditing Journal. 29(4): 350-365.

Valsafah, M. M., Prasetiyo, I. A., Indrawati, M., Ambarwardani, L., & Putri, D. M. (2021, June). Peranan Teknologi Informasi dalam Menunjang Kualitas dan Proses Audit di Era Digital. In Prosiding National Seminar on Accounting, Finance, and Economics (NSAFE) (Vol. 1, No. 2).

Watkins, A.L., Hillison., William., Morecroft., E. Susan. (2004). Audit Quality: A synthesis of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature. 23 (153 – 193

Wardhani, A. A. I. T. W., & Astika, I. B. P. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi, Akuntabilitas dan Independensi pada Kualitas Audit dengan Etika Auditor Sebagai Variabel Moderasi. E-jurnal Akuntansi, 23(1), 31-59

Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas. Educational psychologist, 45(1), 28-36.

Yeghaneh, Y. H., Zangiabadi, M., & Firozabadi, S. D. (2015). Factors affecting information technology audit quality. Journal of Investment and Management, 4(5), 196-203.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26675/jabe.v8i1.37369

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Trinandari Prasetyo Nugrahanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This Journal Indexed by:

          

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.