Student Voices in Teacher Evaluation: The Role of Students in Assessing Student Teachers’ Soft Skills on Asistensi Mengajar Program

Sriyani Mentari, Umi Nuraini, Rizal Palil, Virut Kitnuntaviwat

Abstract


The development of future teachers is not only determined by their mastery of pedagogical competencies, but also by soft skills. However, the evaluation of soft skills in teacher education in Indonesia is still dominated by self, peer, and supervising teacher assessment, while the voices of students are often neglected. This study aims to analyze the differences of soft skills assessment of student teachers participating in the Asistensi Mengajar (AM) program based on a 360-degree feedback approach, as well as to examine the differences between student teachers and students in each dimension of soft skills. This study uses a comparative quantitative design involving 66 student teachers, 198 students, 198 peers, and 66 supervising teachers. Data were collected using a 5-point Likert scale-based soft skills instrument that had been tested for validity and reliability. Data analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post hoc test to examine differences between assessor groups (H1), as well as the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test to compare self-student assessments (H2a–H2d). The results showed a significant differences between the groups of assessors (p < 0.05), particularly between student teachers and students, and between student teachers and their peers. In addition, all dimensions of soft skills showed significant differences between self-assessment and student assessment. Students rated student teachers' communication, problem-solving, and moral attitudes lower, but gave higher scores on adaptability. This study concludes that student voice is a valid and authentic component of evaluation that needs to be integrated into the teacher education assessment system.

Keywords


Student voice; 360-degree feedback; soft skills assessment; Asistensi Mengajar Program

References


Abakah, E. (2023). Teacher learning from continuing professional development (CPD) participation: A sociocultural perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100242

André, S., Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., Telli, S., Chun, S., Fernández-García, C.-M., de Jager, T., Irnidayanti, Y., Inda-Caro, M., Lee, O., Safrina, R., Coetzee, T., & Jeon, M. (2020). Student Perceptions in Measuring Teaching Behavior Across Six Countries: A Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach to Measurement Invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00273

Baroutsis, A., McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2016). Pedagogic voice: student voice in teaching and engagement pedagogies. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1087044

Bartman, I., St-Onge, C., Roy, M., Gingerich, A., Katsoulas, E., Chahine, S., & Gagnon, N. (2025). Multi-source feedback in undergraduate medical education: a pilot study. Canadian Medical Education Journal, 16(2), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79283

Berk, R. A. (2009). Using the 360° multisource feedback model to evaluate teaching and professionalism. Medical Teacher, 31(12), 1073–1080. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421590802572775

Biscaldi, A. (2020). Sympathize with me, motivate and excite me. Some comments about high school students’ expectations regarding their teachers. Educazione Interculturale, 18(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2420-8175/10984

Carpenter, S. K., Witherby, A. E., & Tauber, S. K. (2020). On students’ (mis)judgments of learning and teaching effectiveness. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.12.009

Cheng, T.-F., & Wu, H.-C. (2020). A follow-up study on vocational high school principals’ opinions about 360 degree evaluation feedback and their leadership effectiveness and behavior change. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09608-x

Conner, J., Mitra, D. L., Holquist, S. E., & Boat, A. (2025). How teachers’ student voice practices affect student engagement and achievement: exploring choice, receptivity, and responsiveness to student voice as moderators. Journal of Educational Change, 26(1), 89–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-024-09513-0

Conner, J., Posner, M., & Nsowaa, B. (2022). The Relationship Between Student Voice and Student Engagement in Urban High Schools. The Urban Review, 54(5), 755–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-022-00637-2

Cook-Sather, A. (2020). Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091

Elisa, Mutiara, K., Hamid, A., Syukri, M., Mazlina, H., & Musdar. (2020). The contribution of Internship toward soft skill competencies of pre-service teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012115

Elwood, J., & Murphy, P. (2015). Assessment systems as cultural scripts: a sociocultural theoretical lens on assessment practice and products. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1021568

Fauth, B., Wagner, W., Bertram, C., Göllner, R., Roloff, J., Lüdtke, O., Polikoff, M. S., Klusmann, U., & Trautwein, U. (2020). Don’t blame the teacher? The need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1284.

Fernández-García, C.-M., Maulana, R., Inda-Caro, M., Helms-Lorenz, M., & García-Pérez, O. (2019). Student Perceptions of Secondary Education Teaching Effectiveness: General Profile, the Role of Personal Factors, and Educational Level. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00533

Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., Berry, A., & Ryan, T. (2023). Acting Upon Student Voice-Based Teaching Assessment Initiatives: An Account of Participatory Action Research for Teacher Professional Learning. Journal of Teacher Education, 74(5), 508–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871231200278

Finefter-Rosenbluh, I., Ryan, T., & Barnes, M. (2021). The impact of student perception surveys on teachers’ practice: Teacher resistance and struggle in student voice-based assessment initiatives of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103436

Fitriah, N. (2017). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN EVALUASI KOMPETENSI SOFTSKILL MAHASISWA UNTUK MENGUKUR KESIAPAN DIRI MENGHADAPI DUNIA KERJA DI FITK UIN MAULANA MALIK IBRAHIM MALANG. J-PIPS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial), 3(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.18860/jpips.v3i2.6903

Garcia, K. A., & Pantao, J. G. (2021). Cultural Sensitivity and Classroom Management of Teachers. International Journal of Professional Development, Learners and Learning, 3(1), ep2108. https://doi.org/10.30935/ijpdll/11093

Gencoglu, B., Helms-Lorenz, M., Maulana, R., & Jansen, E. P. W. A. (2021). A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Variability in Student Perceptions. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725407

Gibb, S. (2014). Soft skills assessment: theory development and the research agenda. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 33(4), 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2013.867546

Ginting, N. B., Syarif, Z. N., Maesaroh, M., Jaenudin, J., Widhyaesteoty, D., Yusup, M. A., & Ningrum, L. T. (2022). IMPLEMENTATION OF 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK AND SAW FOR DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM OF ACHIEVING TEACHER’S RECOMMENDATION. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 4(4), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v4i4.447

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2022). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=PONXEAAAQBAJ

Hawley, K. (2019). Conspiracy theories, impostor syndrome, and distrust. Philosophical Studies, 176(4), 969–980. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1222-4

Hendry, G. D., & Oliver, G. R. (2012). Seeing is believing: The benefits of peer observation. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.53761/1.9.1.7

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Huxham, M., Scoles, J., Green, U., Purves, S., Welsh, Z., & Gray, A. (2017). ‘Observation has set in’: comparing students and peers as reviewers of teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(6), 887–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1204594

Jones, C. A., Watkins, F. S., Williams, J., Lambros, A., Callahan, K. E., Lawlor, J., Williamson, J. D., High, K. P., & Atkinson, H. H. (2019). A 360-degree assessment of teaching effectiveness using a structured-videorecorded observed teaching exercise for faculty development. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1596708. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2019.1596708

Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800

Lisa, A., Divya, V., & Lisa, J. (2016). Unpacking instructional alignment : the influence of teachers’ use of assessment data on instruction. Perspectives in Education, 34(4), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v34i4.2

Macqual, S. M., Mohd Salleh, U. K., & Zulnaidi, H. (2021). Assessing prospective teachers’ soft skills curriculum implementation: Effects on teaching practicum success. South African Journal of Education, 41(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v41n3a1915

Maulana, R., Opdenakker, M., & Bosker, R. (2014). Teacher–student interpersonal relationships do change and affect academic motivation: A multilevel growth curve modelling. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 459–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12031

Mentari, S., & Nuris, D. M. (2024). The Effect of Teaching Assistance on The Hard Skills and Soft Skills of Accounting Education Students. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 3(4), 879–885. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v3i4.168

Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging Language Learners in Contemporary Classrooms. In Cambridge Professional Learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781009024563

Modise, M. P., & Vaughan, N. (2024). ePortfolios: A 360-Degree Approach to Assessment in Teacher Education. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 50(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.21432/cjlt28579

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (Issue 972). McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=r0fuAAAAMAAJ

Sabitah, N. M., & Susilo, H. (2017). IMPLEMENTASI METODE PENILAIAN KINERJA 360 DEGREE FEEDBACK UNTUK MENGUKUR SOFT COMPETENCE KARYAWAN (Studi pada PT Petrokimia Gresik). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), 47(1), 56–62. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:116445595

Schaefer, M. B., Pennington, S. E., Divoll, K., & Tang, J. H. (2024). A Systematic Review of Literature on Student Voice and Agency in Middle Grade Contexts. Education Sciences, 14(11), 1158. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111158

Steinberg, M. P., & Donaldson, M. L. (2016). The New Educational Accountability: Understanding the Landscape of Teacher Evaluation in the Post-NCLB Era. Education Finance and Policy, 11(3), 340–359. https://doi.org/10.1162/EDFP_a_00186

Tang, K. N., Hashim, N. H., & Yunus, H. M. (2015). Novice Teacher Perceptions of the Soft Skills Needed in Today’s Workplace. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.338

Tang, K. N., Yie, C., & Shahid, S. (2015). Quality Teaching: Relationship to Soft Skills Acquisition. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1934–1937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.649

Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and Collectivism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499845

UK Department of Education. (2019). School inspections: staff and pupil questionnaire text. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-inspections-staff-and-pupil-questionnaire-text

VicDET. (2019). Amplify. Empowering Students through Voice, Agency and Leadership. Department of Education and Training Melbourne, Victoria. https://www.education.vic.gov.au/Documents/school/teachers/teachingresources/practice/Amplify.pdf

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.

Wallace, T. L., & Chhuon, V. (2014). Proximal Processes in Urban Classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 937–973. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214531324

Wallace, T. L., Kelcey, B., & Ruzek, E. (2016). What Can Student Perception Surveys Tell Us About Teaching? Empirically Testing the Underlying Structure of the Tripod Student Perception Survey. American Educational Research Journal, 53(6), 1834–1868. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216671864

Witter, M., & Rowe, L. (2024). Students Can Identify Quality Teachers, but can They Distinguish Between Dimensions of Quality Teaching? a Comparative Analysis of the Structure Behind the Tripod Survey. Educational Assessment, 29(4), 251–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2024.2414966

Zu, S., Zeng, Q., & Zhang, J. (2022). Investigation on the Teachers’ Morality in Universities: A Comparative Study of Teacher-Student Evaluations*. Advances in Applied Sociology, 12(03), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2022.123005




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jabe.v10i4.63594

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Sriyani Mentari, Umi Nuraini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

This Journal Indexed by:

          

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.