EFL teachers’ reasons for selecting instructional materials during the COVID-19 pandemic

Suharyadi Suharyadi, Anik Nunuk Wulyani


EFL teachers’ reasons for selecting instructional materials during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has changed how teachers teach and students learn in the classroom. One of the challenges in the online teaching is that teachers are required to prepare the instructional materials for their students. This study aims at investigating the EFL teachers’ reasons for choosing the instructional materials in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. By employing a set of questionnaires, this study collected the data from 219 English teachers from various levels of education online via the google form link. The data collection was done for one month starting from 5 May to 5 June 2020. The data were analyzed through a content analysis by identifying, grouping, and categorizing similar and different responses. The results of analysis showed that the EFL teachers have five categories of reasons in selecting the instructional materials in the time of pandemic: the instructional materials should be easy, relevant, simple, attractive, and absent from crime, pornography, and viruses. These results suggest that the EFL teachers make use of these reasons in selecting and developing the instructional materials for their students during and after the pandemic. For future textbook developers, these considerations can be used a reference to develop textbooks which accommodate students’ voices and teachers’ voices during the online teaching and learning activities.

Keywords: EFL, teachers, reasons, instructional materials, COVID-19

Alasan-alasan guru bahasa Inggris sebagai bahasa asing dalam memilih materi pembelajaran selama pandemi COVID-19

Pandemi COVID-19 telah banyak mengubah bagaimana guru mengajar dan siswa belajar di dalam kelas. Salah satu tantangan dalam pembelajaran daring adalah guru harus menyiapkan materi pembelajaran untuk siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menginvestigasi alasan-alasan guru bahasa Inggris dalam memilih materi pembe­la­jaran selama masa pandemi COVID-19. Dengan memanfaatkan angket sebagai ins­trumen penelitian, data dikumpulkan dari 219 guru bahasa Inggris yang berasal dari berbagai tingkat satuan pendidikan. Angket didistribusikan kepada para guru secara daring mulai tanggal 5 Mei sampai 4 Juni 2020. Konten respon guru bahasa Inggris kemudian dianalisis dengan mengidentifikasi, mengelompokkan, dan meng­kategori­kan jawaban-jawaban yang sama dan berbeda. Hasil analisis menujukkan bahwa guru bahasa Inggris memiliki lima alasan dalam memilih materi pembelajaran selama pandemi COVID-19: materi pembelajaran harus mudah, relevan, sederhana, menarik, dan aman dari unsur kriminal, pornografi, dan virus. Berdasarkan hasil ini, guru ba­hasa Inggris disarankan menggunakan lima alasan ini dalam pemilihan dan pengem­bangan materi pembelajaran selama dan setelah pandemi COVID-19. Selain itu, pe­ngembang buku ajar juga disarankan menggunakan hasil ini sebagai referensi dalam mengembangkan buku ajar yang mengakomodasi perspektif para guru dan siswa.

Kata kunci: bahasa Inggris, guru, alasan, materi pembelajaran, COVID-19

Full Text:



Abidah, A., Hidaayatullaah, H. N., Simamora, R. M., Fehabutar, D., & Mutakinati, L. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 to Indonesian education and its relation to the philosophy of “Merdeka Belajar.” Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i1.9

Ahmad, J. (2012). English Language Teaching (ELT) and integration of media technology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 924–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.758

Alexandrou, A. (2020). The importance of collaborative professional learning and development in times of crisis and calm. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 369–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1769886

Allo, M. D. G. (2020). Is the online learning good in the midst of COVID-19 Pandemic? The case of EFL learners. Jurnal Sinestesia, 10(1), 1–10.

Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching activities and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76

Auma, O. M., & Achieng, O. J. (2020). Perception of teachers on effectiveness of online learning in the wake of COVID-19 pandemic. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 25(6), 19–28.

Azhari, B., & Fajri, I. (2021). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: School closure in Indonesia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2021.1875072

Bachiri, H., & Oifaa, T. (2020). The role of ICT in the teaching of productive skills in English during COVID-19: Teachers’ perceptions and obstacles. Linguistic Forum, 2(2), 35–44.

Biswas, B., Roy, S. K., & Roy, F. (2020). Students perception of mobile learning during COVID-19 in Bangladesh: University student perspective. Aquademia, 4(2), ep20023. https://doi.org/10.29333/aquademia/8443

Bukoye, R. O. (2019). Utilization of instruction materials as tools for effective academic performance of students: Implications for counselling. Proceedings, 2(21), 1395. https://doi.org/10.3390/proceedings2211395

Bulusan, F. (2019). Selecting potential instructional materials for literature teaching in the 21st century milieu: Findings from a systematic review of literature. Asian EFL Journal Research, 21(2), 218–231.

Carlgren, T. (2013). Communication, critical thinking, problem solving: A Suggested course for all high school students in the 21st century. Interchange, 44(1–2), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013-9197-8

Chen, C. (2021). Using scaffolding materials to facilitate autonomous online Chinese as a foreign language learning: A study during the COVID-19 pandemic. SAGE Open, 11(3), 215824402110401. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040131

Choi, Y. H., & Lee, H. W. (2008). Current trends and issues in English Language Education in Asia. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 5(2), 1–34.

Chou, J. (2003). Criteria for selecting quality environmental education teaching materials in Taiwan. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 2(3), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15330150390218289

Clark, R. C., & Lyons, C. (2010). Graphics for learning: Proven guidelines for planning, designing and evaluating visuals in training materials. Pfeiffer.

Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2020.3.1.7

Egorov, V. V., Jantassova, D. D., & Churchill, N. (2007). Developing pre‐service English teachers’ competencies for integration of technology in language classrooms in Kazakhstan. Educational Media International, 44(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980701491732

Fansury, A. H., Januarty, R., Rahman, A. W., & Syawal. (2020). Digital content for millennial generations: Teaching the English foreign language learner on COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 55(3), 40. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.55.3.40

Facione, P. A. (2007). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Retrieved January 2, 2022, from http://www.telacommunications.com/nutshell/ cthinking7.htm

Gagné, R. M. (1988). Mastery learning and instructional design. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 1(1), 7–18.

Gronlund, N. E. (2000). How to write and use instructional objectives, 6th ed. Merrill.

Hartshorn, K. J., & McMurry, B. L. (2020). The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on ESL learners and TESOL practitioners in the United States. International Journal of TESOL Studies, 2(2), 140–156. https://doi.org/10.46451/ijts.2020.09.11

Hasan, N., & Bao, Y. (2020). Impact of “e-Learning crack-up” perception on psychological distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of “fear of academic year loss.” Children and Youth Services Review, 118, 105355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105355

Ibeneme, O. T. (2000). Provision and utilization of instructional equipment for teaching and learning science and technology. Issues in Educational Journal, 1, 139-144.

Joseph Paschal, M., & Mkulu, D. G. (2020). Online classes during COVID-19 pandemic in higher learning institutions in Africa. Global Research in Higher Education, 3(3), p1. https://doi.org/10.22158/grhe.v3n3p1

Khatoony, S., & Nezhadmehr, M. (2020). EFL teachers’ challenges in the integration of technology for online classrooms during Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Iran. The Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 8(special issue), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajelp.vol8.sp.1.2020

Krishan, I. A., Ching, H. S., Ramalingam, S., Maruthai, E., Kandasamy, P., Mello, G. D., Munian, S., & Ling, W. W. (2020). Challenges of learning English in 21st Century: Online vs. traditional during COVID-19. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i9.494

Lestiyanawati, R. (2020). The strategies and problems faced by indonesian teachers in conducting e-learning during COVID-19 outbreak. CLLiENT (Culture, Literature, Linguistics, and English Teaching), 2(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.32699/cllient.v2i1.1271

M. Amin, F., & Sundari, H. (2020). EFL students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video Conference, LMS, or Messenger Application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16929

Magner, U. I. E., Glogger, I., & Renkl, A. (2016). Which features make illustrations in multimedia learning interesting? Educational Psychology, 36(9), 1596–1613. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2014.933177

Mayer, R. E. (2002). Rote versus meaningful learning. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4

Means, B., & Neisler, J. (2021). Teaching and learning in the time of COVID: The student perspective. Online Learning, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i1.2496

Miri, B., David, B.-C., & Uri, Z. (2007). Purposely teaching for the promotion of higher-order thinking skills: A case of critical thinking. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9029-2

Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205

Niemi, H. M., & Kousa, P. (2020). A case study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions in a Finnish high school during the covid pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.167

Olawale, S. K. (2013). The use of instructional materials for effective learning of Islamic studies. Jihāt Al-Islām, 6(2), 29–40.

Olayinka, A.-R. B. (2016). Effects of instructional materials on secondary schools students’ academic achievement in social studies in Ekiti State, Nigeria. World Journal of Education, 6(1), p32. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v6n1p32

Parkes, J., & Harris, M. B. (2002). The purposes of a syllabus. College Teaching, 50(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567550209595875

Peter, E. E. (2012). Critical thinking: Essence for teaching mathematics and mathematics problem solving skills. African Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science Research, 5(3), 39–43.

Rice, M. F., & Ortiz, K. R. (2021). Evaluating digital instructional materials for K-12 online and blended learning. TechTrends, 65(6), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00671-z

Richards, J. C. (2006). Materials development and research—Making the connection. RELC Journal, 37(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206063470

Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00096

Scriven, M. & Paul R. (2007). Defining critical thinking. The critical thinking community. foundation for critical thinking. Retrieved January 12, 2022 from http: //www.critical thinking.org/about CT/define_critical_ thinking.ctm.

Scull, J., Phillips, M., Sharma, U., & Garnier, K. (2020). Innovations in teacher education at the time of COVID19: An Australian perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802701

Sepulveda-Escobar, P., & Morrison, A. (2020). Online teaching placement during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile: Challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Teacher Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820981

Sheerin, S. (1991). State of the art: Self-access. Language Teaching, 24(3), 143-157.

Sulik, G., & Keys, J. (2014). “Many students really do not yet know how to behave!”: The syllabus as a tool for socialization. Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X13513243

Talidong, K. J. B., & Toquero, C. M. D. (2020). Philippine teachers’ practices to deal with anxiety amid COVID-19. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(6–7), 573–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1759225

Tarrayo, V. N., & Anudin, A. G. (2021). Materials development in flexible learning amid the pandemic: Perspectives from English language teachers in a Philippine state university. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1939703

Terenko, O., & Ogienko, O. (2020). How to teach pedagogy courses online at university in COVID-19 Pandemic: Search for answers. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 12(1Sup2), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/12.1sup2/261

Umar, V. (2020). An interview on the utilization of e-instructional materials for teaching extensive reading course during pandemic COVID-19. Proceedings of the 4th INACELT (International Conference on English Language Teaching), 5, 212–221.

Vallori, A. B. (2014). Meaningful learning in practice. Journal of Education and Human Development, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v3n4a18

Wang, E. L., Tuma, A. P., Lawrence, R. A., Kaufman, J. H., Woo, A., & Henry, D. (2021). School leaders’ role in selecting and supporting teachers’ use of instructional materials: An interview study. RAND Corporation. https://doi.org/10.7249/RRA134-9

Wong, K. M., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). The impact of social uncertainty, protests, and COVID-19 on Hong Kong teachers. Journal of Loss and Trauma, 25(8), 649–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325024.2020.1776523

Xie, W., Ji, C., Hao, T., & Chow, C.-Y. (2021). Predicting the easiness and complexity of English health materials for international tertiary students with linguistically enhanced machine learning algorithms: Development and validation study. JMIR Medical Informatics, 9(10), e25110. https://doi.org/10.2196/25110

Xie, Z. (2020). Effectiveness of autonomous learning materials for students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case study of the Daxie Second Elementary School in Ningbo, Zhejiang, China. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3626367

Yen, N. T. L., & Cuong, T. Q. (2018). Integration mobile technology into english lessons: A case study at VNU-ULIS and VNU-UED. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4148

Yi, Y., & Jang, J. (2020). Envisioning possibilities amid the COVID‐19 pandemic: Implications from English language teaching in South Korea. TESOL Journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.543

Zahorik, J. A. (1996). Elementary and secondary teachers’ reports of how they make learning interesting. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 551–564. https://doi.org/10.1086/461844

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v50i12022p49


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya is licensed under
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
AnalyticsView My Stats
Based on the Official Letter from the Director General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology No 158/E/KPT/2021, dated December 27, 2021, Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni dan Pengajarannya is granted RANK 2 JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC ACCREDITATION PERIOD I YEAR 2021. This rating status is valid for 5 (five) years up to Vol 53, No 1, 2025.

Dear Sir/Madam

We appreciate your continued confidence and trust in Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya (JBS). In order to enhance the service, readability, and quality of JBS publications, we will be transitioning to a new website, https://citeus.um.ac.id/jbs, in collaboration with Digital Commons (Elsevier) starting in July 2024.


Yusuf Hanafi
(Editor in chief)

Editorial Office:
Gedung D16 Lantai 2 Fakultas Sastra UM Jl. Semarang 5 Kota Malang, Jawa Timur, Indonesia 65145

Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
JPtpp is licensed under