THIRST TWEETS: WOMEN’S LANGUAGE USED TO SEXUALLY OBJECTIFY MEN
Abstract
This study explores thirst tweets as sexual objectification with women as the writers and men as the targets, and the reason this phenomenon is allowed by society. As a new trend by BuzzFeed, thirst tweets are a set of tweets where mostly women compliment celebrities’ bodies. The data were gathered from a playlist video under the account BuzzFeed Celeb on YouTube. Firstly, Fairclough’s (2013) CDA and Langton’s (2009) Sexual Objectification theories were used to analyze the social relations of thirst tweets with sexual objectification. Secondly, watching the celebs’ reactions and comparing it to Berdahl et al. (1996) answered public’s tolerance in objectifying men. The results show that the construction of thirst tweets is in the form of reducing to the body and appearance, using violent language, and calling the celebs ‘daddy’. Also, the celebrities’ reactions and power play an important part in that the objectification is justifiable. While few felt uncomfortable, the male celebs still act polite by thanking the writers. Writers, as the consumers in a fandom, felt they are entitled to objectify these celebrities.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abraham, L. B., Mörn, M. P., & Vollman, A. (2010). Women on the Web How Women are Shaping the Internet. ComScore, Incorprorated.
Attenborough, F. (2011). Complicating the sexualisation thesis: The media, gender and ‘sci-candy.’ Sage Publications, Ltd., 22 (6)(Discourse&Society), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511411693
Blos, P. (1987). Freud and the Father Complex. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 42(1), 425–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/00797308.1987.11823499
Calogero, R. M., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Thompson, J. K. (Eds.). (2011). Objectification theory: An introduction. In Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. (pp. 3–21). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12304-001
Chandrasekaran, A. (2019, December 20). Thirst Tweets Walk a Thin Line Between Sexual Expression and Objectification. The Swaddle. https://theswaddle.com/thirst-tweets-walk-a-thin-line-between-sexual-expression-and-objectification/
Cornwall, A., & Rivas, A.-M. (2015). From ‘gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly, 36(2), 396–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1013341
Deleuze, G., & Foucault, M. (1972). Intellectuals and Power. 8.
Farhi, P. (2005, April 1). Conception of a Question: Who’s Your Daddy? The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46032-2005Jan3.html
Febrianty, A. F., & Zahro, F. (2018). Sexual Harassment on Social Media: The Case of BLACKPINK’s Lisa and Jonathan “Jojo” Christie [Paper presentation]. UM De Universe, Malang. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331101575_Sexual_Harassment_on_Social_Media_The_Case_of_BLACKPINK's_Lisa_and_Jonathan_Jojo_Christie 11.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women’s Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., Förster, J., Maass, A., & Suitner, C. (2012). Seeing women as objects: The sexual body part recognition bias: Seeing women as objects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(6), 743–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1890
Gilbert, F., & Daffern, M. (2017). Aggressive scripts, violent fantasy and violent behavior: A conceptual clarification and review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 36, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.001
Jensen, R. E. (2010). A Content Analysis of Youth Sexualized Language and Imagery in Adult Film Packaging, 1995–2007. Journal of Children and Media, 4(4), 371–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2010.510005
Jiang, Y. (2020, September). Psychological Factors of Fandoms Engagement in the East Asian Pop Idol Group Culture. Fandom Psychology Project [Paper presentation]. The Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Conference, San Fransisco. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344149281_Psychological_Factors_of_Fandoms_Engagement_in_the_East_Asian_Pop_Idol_Group_Culture
Kibbe, K. (2019, June 14). Where Do Daddies Come From? InsideHook. https://www.insidehook.com/article/sex-and-dating/origin-of-the-word-daddy
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and Woman’s Place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45–80.
Lotts, M. (2016). “Daddy”: No Longer A Term Of Endearment. The Odyssey Online, Politics and Activism. https://www.theodysseyonline.com/daddy-longer-term-endearment
Loughnan, S., & Pacilli, M. G. (2014). Seeing (and treating) others as sexual objects: Toward a more complete mapping of sexual objectification. Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 3, 309–325. https://doi.org/10.4473/TPM21.3.6
Ott, M., & Frank, B. (2016). Tweet Like a Girl: A Corpus Analysis of Gendered Language in Social Media. 32.
Park, G., Yaden, D. B., Schwartz, H. A., Kern, M. L., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., Ungar, L. H., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook. PLOS ONE, 11(5), e0155885. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155885
Pauwels, A. (2003). Linguistic Sexism and Feminist Linguistic Activism. In J. Holmes & M. Meyerhoff (Eds.), The Handbook of Language and Gender (pp. 550–570). Blackwell Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756942.ch24
Shepherd, L. (2019). Responding to Sexual Objectification: The Role of Emotions in Influencing Willingness to Undertake Different Types of Action. Sex Roles, 80(1–2), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0912-x
Smutradontri, P., & Gadavanij, S. (2020). Fandom and identity construction: An analysis of Thai fans’ engagement with Twitter. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7(1), 177. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00653-1
Soedjono, A. H. (2012). The comparisons between the language used by male and female peers in Twitter. Journal Unair, 1, 6.
Staples, L. (2019, September 20). Why Thirst Online Has Taken a Violent Turn. GQ. https://www.gq.com/story/why-our-online-thirst-has-taken-a-violent-turn
Szymanski, D. M., Moffitt, L. B., & Carr, E. R. (2011). Sexual Objectification of Women: Advances to Theory and Research 1ψ7. The Counseling Psychologist, 39(1), 6–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000010378402
Tannen, D. (1995). The Power of Talk: Who Gets Heard and Why. Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 138–148.
Webb, L. M., & Temple, N. (2016). Social Media and Gender Issues. In Handbook of Research on the Societal Impact of Digital Media (pp. 638–669). IGI Global.
Weinkauf, K. (2010). “YEAH, HE’S MY DADDY”: LINGUISTIC CONSTRUCTIONS OF FICTIVE KINSHIPS IN A STREET-LEVEL SEX WORK COMMUNITY. 8, 20.
Zhu, L. (2019). Woman Language: Features and Historic Change. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 10(1), 161. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1001.18
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um046v6i22022p51-62
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 J-ELLiT (Journal of English Language, Literature, and Teaching)
Editorial and Administration Office:
This Journal is published and managed by Department of English, Faculty of Letters, Universitas Negeri Malang.
Jl. Semarang No. 5, Malang, Indonesia.
Phone. (0341) 551312.
Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jellit/index
email: jellit.journal@um.ac.id
P-ISSN: 2580-670X
E-ISSN: 2580-9687
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Cover designed by Rahmati P. Yaniafari
