Implementation of Inquiry based Learning with OE3R Strategy and the Impacts to Students' Conceptual Understanding in Fundamental of Analytical Chemistry

Pradita Rahmadhani, Sutrisno Sutrisno, Hayuni Retno Widarti

Abstract


Chemistry created based on process how scientists work and think to understanding a phenomenon or problem that occurs in natural world. That activities gained through physical and mental activities. Discoveries on Science are obtained and solved using inquiry thinking. Many inquiry-based learning strategies have been developed, one of it’s the OE3R (Orientation – Exploration – Explanation – Elaboration - Reflection) Strategy.  The purpose of implementation of OE3R strategy on lecturing Fundamental of Analytical Chemistry are to determine effectiveness and differences of students’ conceptual understanding achievements. This research design using a Quasy experiment with pretest and posttest in two groups with different treatment. The Experimental Group learn using OE3R strategy, then the Control Group using conventional strategy based lecturer method. The subject of research was student in Fundamental of Analytical Chemsitry courses at Chemistry Department, Universitas Negeri Malang. The result show that inquiry-based learning with OE3R strategy as innovation learning effective to make differences of students’ conceptual understanding achievements in this courses.

Keywords


Inquiry based learning; OE3R Strategy; Conceptual Understanding; Titrimetry Titrations

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrianie, D., Sudarmin, S., & Wardani, S. (2018). Penerapan model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing berbantuan LKS berbasis representasi kimia untuk mereduksi miskonsepsi siswa pada materi redoks. Chemistry in Education, 7(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1902.tb00418.x

Arsyad, A. (2011). Media pembelajaran. PT Raja grafindo persada.

Ausubel, D. G. (1963). Cognitive structure and the facilitation of meaningful verbal learning 1. Journal of Teacher Education, 14(2), 217–222. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002248716301400220

Barrouillet, P. (2015). Theories of cognitive development: From Piaget to today. Developmental Review (Elsevier), 38(December), 1–12.

Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard University Press.

Buto, Z. A. (2010). Implikasi teori pembelajaran jerome bruner dalam nuansa pendidikan modern. Millah: Jurnal Studi Agama, 10(Desember (Edisi Khusus)), 55–69.

Eisenkraft, A. (2003). Expanding the 5E model. Science Teacher, 70(6), 56–59.

Enger, S. K., & Yager, R. E. (2009). Assessing student understanding in science: A standards-based K-12 handbook. Corwin Press SAGE Company.

Fitriyani, S., Sudin, A., & Sujana, A. (2016). Penerapan model Learning Cycle pada materi sumber daya alam untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas IVA SDN 1 Depok Kecamatan Depok Kabupaten Cirebon. Jurnal Pena Ilmiah, 1(1), 511–520.

Hanson, R. (2014). Using small scale chemistry equipment for the study of some organic chemistry topics-a case study in an undergraduate class in Ghana. Small, 5(18), 59–64.

Hanson, R. (2017). Enhancing students ‘performance in organic chemistry through context-based learning and micro activities-a case study. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences Vol, 5(6), 7–20.

Haryani, S. P., Prasetya, A. T., & Wardani, S. (2007). Penugasan perencanaan percobaan pada praktikum dasar-dasar kimia analitik untuk meningkatkan keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa calon guru. Seminar Nasional Kerjasama UNDIP-UNNES-UNS.

Hidayah, N. (2016). Pengaruh penggunaan teknik Cross-Line terhadap pemahaman konsep Matematika pada materi perkalian elas III SDN Cempaka Putih 01 Ciputat ahun ajaran 2016-2017. Skripsi (Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah).

Imas, A. F., Sutrisno, S., & Widarti, H. R. W. R. (2020). Oe3r strategy implementation as an innovation on inquiry based learning toward redox reaction mastery. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 25(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um048v25i1p43-49

Johnstone, A. H. (1998). The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. Journal of Chemical Education, 70(9), 701–705.

Kean, E., & Middlecamp, C. (1985). A survival manual for general chemistry (Panduan belajar kimia dasar). Gramedia.

Kurniawati, I. D., & Diantoro, M. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing integrasi peer instruction terhadap penguasaan konsep dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 10(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/https://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v10i1.3049

Pahriah, P., & Hendrawani, H. (2018). Efektifitas penggunaan modul multipel representasi berbasis inkuiri pada materi laju reaksi terhadap pemahaman konsep calon guru kimia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lembaga Penelitian Dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala, 370–374.

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., De Jong, T., Van Riesen, S. A., Kamp, E. T., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14(February), 47–61.

Perdana, R., & Rudibyani, R. B. (2018). Enhancing students’ cognitive outcome in chemistry by guided inquiry learning models. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research, 37(3), 41–51.

Ristekdikti. (2015). Standar nasional pendidikan tinggi (Patent No. 44).

Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8–13.

Samara, N. A. H. (2016). Effectiveness of analogy instructional strategy on undergraduate student’s acquisition of organic chemistry concepts in Mutah University, Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(8), 70–74.

Sari, D. J., Fadiawati, N., & Tania, L. (2018). Efektivitas e-book interaktif asam basa berbasis representasi kimia dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Kimia, 7(2), 237–250.

Sartika, R. P. (2018). Peranan model siklus belajar 5e dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep sifat koligatif larutan. EduChemia (Jurnal Kimia Dan Pendidikan), 3(2), 157–171.

Sastrika, I. A. K., Sadia, W., & Muderawan, I. W. (2013). Pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap pemahaman konsep kimia dan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 3(2).

Septiani, D., & Sumarni, W. (2014). Efektivitas model inkuiri berbantuan modul dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan generik sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 8(2), 1340–1350.

Slavin, R. E. (1989). Cooperative learning and student achievement: Six theoretical perspectives. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 45(2), 31–33.

Smallhorn, M., Young, J., Hunter, N., & da Silva, K. B. (2015). Inquiry-based learning to improve student engagement in a large first year topic. Student Success, 6(2), 65–72.

Supasorn, S., & Promarak, V. (2015). Implementation of 5E inquiry incorporated with analogy learning approach to enhance conceptual understanding of chemical reaction rate for grade 11 students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1039/c4rp00190g

Sutrisno, S. (2018). OE3R (Orientasi-Eksplorasi-Eksplanasi-Elaborasi-Refleksi): Sebuah inovasi strategi pembelajaran sains-kimia berbasis inkuiri. Seminar Nasional Kimia Dan Pembelajaran (SNKP), 48–60.

Sutrisno, S., Nanda, G. A. M., & Widarti, H. R. (2020). The effectiveness of inquiry based learning with Oe3r strategy for conceptual understanding of molecular shape of high school students’. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2215(1), 20–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0000620 (April).

Uwaleke, C. C. (2013). Analytical skill as a correlate of chemistry achievement among senior secondary school students in Anambra State. In Unpublished Master’s Thesis). Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka.

WAEC. (2015). Accra: West African examinations council.

Wenning, C. J. (2005). Level of inquiry: Hierarchies of pedagogical practices and inquiry processes. J. Phys. Teach. Educ. Online, 2(3), 3–11.

Zaini, M. (2016). Guided inquiry based learning on the concept of ecosystem toward learning outcomes and critical thinking skills of high school students. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 6(6), 50–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0606085055




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um048v26i2p78-83

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
ISSN: 0215-9643 | E-ISSN: 2442-8655
Contact
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)
Graha Rektorat, Floor 6, Jl. Semarang No 5 Malang 65145
Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jip
E-mail: jip@um.ac.id

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats