Influence of Lecturer's Pedagogic Competency Level, Quality of Administrative Services, Completeness of Lecture Supporting Facilities, and Student Satisfaction on Learning Motivation

Raden Bambang Sumarsono, Imam Gunawan, Desi Eri Kusumaningrum, Djum Djum Noor Benty, Athalla Nauval Bhayangkara

Abstract


This research aims to know students' perceptions of the competencies of pedagogical lecturers, the quality of administrative services, the completeness of the facilities supporting lectures, student satisfaction and its relationship with the motivation of student learning. The approach used is quantitative with the design of survey research. The research population was 3,702 of FIP UM students, while the sample was 361 students. The study was conducted in 2020. Sampling techniques using proportional sampling and simple random sampling. Data collection using questionnaires, meanwhile for data analysis using two kinds of analysis techniques, namely descriptive analysis and path analysis. The results showed: (1) the competency of pedagogic lecturers, and the quality of administrative services according to the perception of students in the category is quite good, while the student's perception of the completeness of the lecture support facilities in the category is quite complete, the student expresses satisfaction for the services received. But on the motivation of studying of FIP students have a low level; (2) there is an influence on the level of pedagogical competency of lecturers on the motivation of student learning; (3) there is an influence on the quality of administrative services on student learning motivation; (4) there is an influence on the completeness of the facilities to support lectures on the motivation of student learning; (5) there is an influence of satisfaction on the motivation of student learning; and (6) simultaneously there is the influence of lecturer competency level, quality of administrative services, completeness of lecture support facilities, and student satisfaction on learning motivation.

Keywords


Pedagogical Competency; Administrative Services; Lecture Supporting Facilities; Student Satisfaction; Martial Arts Motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrami, P. C., D’Apollonia, S., & Cohen, P. A. (1990). The validity ofstudent ratings of instruction: What we know and what we do not. Journal Of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 219–231.

Akbar, S. F., & Awang, H. B. (2020). Decision support system course in developed and developing countries. Letters in Information Technology Education (LITE), 3(1), 41–48.

Ali, A., & Ahmad, I. (2011). Key factors for determining students’ satisfaction in distance learning courses: A study of Allama Iqbal Open University. Contemporary Education Technology, 2(2), 118–134.

Aritonang, L., R. (2005). Kepuasan pelanggan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2016). Optimizing students’ motivation in the era of testing and pressure: A self-determination theory perspective In Building autonomous learners. Springer.

Dimyati, D., & Mujiono, M. (2009). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta.

Earthman, G. I., Cash, C. S., & Van Berkum, D. (1996). Student achievement and behavior and school building condition. The Journal Of School Business Management, 8(3), 26–27.

Gravestock, P., & Gregor-Greenleaf, E. (2008). Student courseevaluafions: Research, models, and trends. Higher Education Quality Council Of Ontario.

Gronroos, C. (1990). Relationship approach to marketing in service contexts: The marketing and organizational behavior interface. Journal of Business Research, 20(1), 3–11.

Hughey, D., Chawla, S., & Khan, Z. (2003). Measuring the quality of university computer labs using Servqual. The Quality Management Journal, 10(3), 33–44.

Ilyas, I. (2014). Tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap layanan akademik dosen Pendidikan Agama Islam (penelitian pada mahasiswa semester II Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Semarang). Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 31(2).

Kertamuda, F. (2008). Pengaruh motivasi tehadap prestasi belajar. Journal Psikologi, 21(1), 27.

Kotler, P. (1999). Marketing management. Prentice Hall Inc.

Lyons, J. B. (2002). The learning environment: Do school facilities really affect a child’seducation? Learning By Design, 11(2002), 10–13.

Martínez-Argüelles, M. J., & Batalla-Busquets, J. M. (2016). Perceived service quality and student loyalty in an online university. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(4), 264–279.

Mashudi, M. (2018). Strategi pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Jigsaw versus pembelajaran langsung. In Edudeena (Vol. 2, Issue 2). STAIN Kediri. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v2i2.724

Nuri, S., Nuraini, F., & Permana, I. (2018). Pengaruh sarana dan prasarana terhadap semangat dan hasil belajar mahasiswa IKIP Siliwangi. Parole: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 1(3), 303–314.

Oettingen, G., Mayer, D., Timur Sevincer, A., Stephens, E. J., Pak, H. J., & Hagenah, M. (2009). Mental contrasting and goal commitment: The mediating role of energization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(5), 608–622.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50.

Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). Servqual: A Multiple-Item Scale For Measuring Consumer Perceptions Of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.

Riswanto, A., & Aryani, S. (2017). Learning motivation and student achievement : Description analysis and relationships both. Couns-Edu: The International Journal of Counseling and Education, 2, 42. https://doi.org/10.23916/002017026010

Sallis, E. (2014). Total quality management in education: Third edition. In Total Quality Management in Education: Third Edition. https://doi.org/¬10.¬4324/¬9780203417010

Sari, R. N. I., & Hadijah, H. S. (2016). Peningkatan kinerja pegawai melalui kepuasan kerja dan disiplin kerja (Reach employee performance by job performance and work discipline). Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 1(1), 204–214.

Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foun-dations of the new reform. Harward Educafional Review, 57(1), 1–23.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowlegde growthin teaching. Educafional Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

Sonhadji, A. (2012). Human, technology, and education: Toward new civilization. UM Press.

Stodnick, M., & Rogers, P. (2008). Using Servqual to measure the quality of the classroom experience. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 115–133.

Suarman, S. (2015). Teaching quality and student’s satisfaction: The intermediatory role of relationship between lecturers and students at the higher learning institutes. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 626–632.

Sudjana, N. (2001). Penilaian hasil dan proses belajar mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sujati, S. (2013). Kompetensi pedagogik dosen PGSD FIP UNY. Jurnal Peneltian Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(2).

Sumarsono, R. B. (2012). Faktor yang mempengaruhi kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap kualitas layanan laboratorium. Manajemen Pendidikan, 23(6), 411–417.

Teerawut, T. (2011). Undergraduate students’ satisfaction toward the new education system in Thailand. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3(2), 443–455.

Tubbs, N. (2004). Philosophy’s higher education. Springer Science Business Media, Inc.

Uno, H. B. (2013). Teori motivasi & pengukurannya: Analisis di bidang pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Wrahatnolo, T. (2018). 21st centuries skill implication on educational system. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 012036. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/296/1/012036

Zadina, J. N. (2014). Multiple pathways to the student brain: Energizing and enhancing instruction. In Multiple pathways to the student brain: Energizing and enhancing instruction. John Wiley & Sons.

Zeitharml, V. A. (1990). Delivering service quality: Balancing customer perceptions and expectations. The Free Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um048v27i1p23-33

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
ISSN: 0215-9643 | E-ISSN: 2442-8655
Contact
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)
Graha Rektorat, Floor 6, Jl. Semarang No 5 Malang 65145
Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jip
E-mail: jip@um.ac.id

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats