2.png)
1.png)
1.png)
1.png)
1.png)
4.png)
.png)
1.png)
.png)
.png)
3.png)
1.png)
1.png)
Email this article A Cognitive Assessment Instrument for HOTS Development in Technical Drawing Subjects Utilizing Quizziz Learning Platform
Abstract
Assessment or evaluation is the activity of collecting student information or a program of activities related to certain dimensions or attributes, such as student learning outcomes in teaching a field of study or the effectiveness of studying a field of study organized by the teacher, to be compared. Dimensional or characteristic excellence standards are associated with students or activity programs. For example, Quizizz, a digital platform that helps students master reading, is a multiplayer class activity that allows all students to practice reading skills using mobile devices, such as tablets, iPads, and Smartphones. This research use the Research and Development (R&D) method using the ADDIE research development model which is very applicable in the development of formal education. Based on the results of the validation value analysis carried out by two validators, the average percentage of very feasible category assessment instruments was 90.62 percent. Based on the results of the validity test shown on the 32 multiple choice HOTS questions used in the pilot study with 33 students, 26 items were determined to be valid. Based on the results of the reliability test, the value of the test analysis is included in the "high" category. The study of the difficulty level of the 32 questions yielded the following results: 15 simple questions, 14 moderate questions, and three challenging questions. In addition, according to the analysis of discriminatory power, nine items fall into the proper category, 21 items fall into the good category, one item falls into the poor category, and one item falls into the very poor category.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach (Vol. 722). Springer.
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Ascd.
Candel, E. C., Agustín, M. P., & De Ory, E. G. (2021). ICT and gamification experiences with CLIL methodology as innovative resources for the development of competen¬cies in compulsory secondary education. Digital Education Review, 39, 238–256. https://-doi.org/¬10.¬1344/der.2021.39.238-256
Drastiawati, N. S., Susanti, N. A., Ningsih, T. H., Wulandari, D., & Ganda, A. N. F. (2020). Pelatihan solidwork sebagai upaya meningkatkan kemampuan teknik menggambar bagi siswa SMKN. JCES (Journal of Character Education Society), 3(3), 439–448.
Hadi, S., Retnawati, H., Munadi, S., Apino, E., & Wulandari, N. F. (2018). The difficulties of high school students in solving higher-order thinking skills problems. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(4), 520.
Hamzah, H., Hamzah, M. I., & Zulkifli, H. (2022). Systematic Literature review on the elements of metacognition-based Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) teaching and learning modules. Sustainability, 14(2), 813. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/¬10.3390/-su14020813
Husamah, H., Fatmawati, D., & Setyawan, D. (2018). OIDDE learning model: Improving higher order thinking skills of biology teacher candidates. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/https:¬//doi.-org/10.12973/iji.2018.11217a
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., & Miarsyah, M. (2019). Environmental learning based on higher order thinking skills: a needs assessment. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(1), 21–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i1.1389
Ichsan, I. Z., Sigit, D. V., Miarsyah, M., Ali, A., Arif, W. P., & Prayitno, T. A. (2019). HOTS-AEP: Higher order thinking skills from elementary to master students in environmental learning. European Journal of Edu-cational Research, 8(4), 935–942. https:¬//doi.¬org/-https:¬//doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.935
Janković, A., & Lambić, D. (2022). The effect of game-based learning via Ka hoot and Qui zizz on the academic achievement of third grade primary school students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 21(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/22.21.224
Kurniawaty, I., Faiz, A., & Purwati, P. (2022). Strategi Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(4), 5170–5175.
Mataputun, Y. (2020). Analisis pemenuhan standar nasional pendidikan dan permasalahannya. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 8(3), 224. https://doi.org/10.29210/148800
Razi, F. (2021). Konsep dasar evaluasi pembelajaran. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, A., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215
Setiawan, H., & Tumardi, T. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen asesmen kompetensi pada ranah afektif di Sekolah Dasar. Musamus Journal of Primary Education, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.¬35724/¬musjpe.-v2i1.1944
Sherly, S., Herman, H., Halim, F., Dharma, E., Purba, R., Sinaga, Y. K., & Tannuary, A. (2021). Sosialisasi implementasi program profil pelajar pancasila di smp swasta sultan agung pematangsiantar. Jubaedah: Jurnal Pengabdian Dan Edukasi Sekolah (Indonesian Journal of Community Services and School Education), 1(3), 282–289.
Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A comparative study of the addie instructional design model in distance education. Information, 13(9), 402. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/info13090402
Sugiyono, S. (2018). Metode penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif.
Zainal, N. F. (2020). Pengukuran, assessment dan evaluasi dalam pembelajaran matematika. Laplace: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 8–26. https://-doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31537/laplace.v3i1.310.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um048v29i1p1-6
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
| Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan |
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.