UNDERSTANDING THE CHARACTERISTICS OF A SPEECH BASED ON GENDER-BASED CONVERSATIONS

Pidekso Adi

Abstract


conversation is the embodiment of human expression by procedures, methods, and resources associated with the context. The context becomes the deciding factor that gives the perception between the speaker and the hearer so that the conversation interactive. Interactivity conversation that occurs because of the efforts of the speakers to interpret utterances addressees so as to make it a meaningful conversation. Conditions for mutual interpret perspective that is referred to as reciprocity of perspective. The existence of reciprocity of perspective, the conversation will be dynamic. Thus, the existence of reciprocity of perspective on the identity of the speaker and hearer are caused by the difference between the sexes will affect the process of speech. If the speaker's gender to male perspective to the addressees subordinate female then reciprocity will be different perspectives with speakers of the male sex who have different perspectives of the speakers superordinatif female.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ainsworth-Vaughn, N. (1992). Topic Transitions in Physician-Patient Interviews: Power, Gender, and Discourse Change. Dalam Bright, W. (Ed). Language in Society. Vol. 21 Number 3, September (p.409-426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Allen, D. E. dan Guy, R. F. (1978). Conversation Analysis: The Sociology of Talk. The Hague: Mouton.

Bell, R. T. (Tanpa Tahun). Sosiolinguistik: Sajian Tujuan, Pendekatan, dan Problem-Problemnya. Terjemahan oleh Ibrahim, A. S. 1995. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Brown, G dan Yule, G. (1984). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chastain, K. (1976). Developing Second language Skills: Theory to Practice. Chicago: Rand Mcnally College Publishing Company.

Clark, H. H. dan Clark, E. V. (1977). Psychology and Language: An Introduction to Psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.

Coupland, J. January 2003. Small Talk: Social Functions. Research on Language and Social Interaction. 36(1):1-6. DOI:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3601_1

Crystal, D. (1987). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cuc, M.C. 2014. Development of a communication system for capitalizing cultural Diversity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 143 (2014) 63 – 67. Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty Psychology and Sciences of Education, 7 Sindicatelor street, 400029, Cluj- Napoca, Romania. Elsevier Ltd.

De Klerk, V. (1992). How Taboo are Taboo Words for Girls? Language in Society. Vol. 21 Number 2, June (p.277-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ehrlich, S. dan King, R. (1994). Feminist Meaning and the (De)politization of the Lexicon. Dalam Bright, W. (Ed.). Language in Society. Vol. 23 Number 1, March (p. 59-76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gleason, H. A. (1961). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.

Hocket, C. F. (1958). A Course in Modern Linguistics. New York: Macmillan.

Hoey, M. (1991). Some Properties of Spoken Discourse. Dalam Bowers, R. dan Brumfit, C. (Eds), Applied Linguistics and English Language Teaching (p. 65 – 84). London and Basingstoke: Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Hughes, S. E. (1992). Expletives of Lower Working-class Women. Language in Society. Vol. 21 Number 2, June (p.291-303). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutchby, I. dan Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices, and Applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Imada, H., Romano, A. & Mifune, N. 2023. Dynamic indirect reciprocity: When is indirect reciprocity bounded by group membership?. Evolution and Human Behavior 44 (2023) 373–383. journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ens. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.05.002. Received 22 February 2023.

Johnson, D. M. dan Roen, D. H. (1992). Complimenting and Involvement in Peer Reviews: Gender Variation. Language in Society. Vol. 21 Number 1, March (p. 27-57). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kramarae, C. (1981). Women and Men Speaking. Rowley: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and Woman. New York: Harper and Row.

Lee, D. (1992). Competing Discourses: Perspective and Ideology in Language. London: Longman Group UK Limited.

Levinson, S. C. (1992). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maltz, D. N. and Borker, R. A. (1982). A Cultural Approach to Male-Famale Miscommunication. Dalam Gumperz, J.J. (Ed.) Communication, Language, and Social Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Manning, J. 2020. Interpersonal communication. In D. L. Merskin (Ed.), The SAGE international encyclopedia of mass media and society (online ed.; pp. 1-5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

McConnel-Ginet, S. (1990). Language and Gender. Dalam Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey: Language: The Socio-cultural Context. Volume IV. Newmeyer, F. J. (Ed.). Cambrodge: Cambridge University Press.

Neculăesei, A.N. (2015). Culture and GenderRole Differences. Cross-Cultural Management Journal Volume XVII, Issue 1 (7) /2015, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Laşi.

Nunan, D. (1992). Research Methods in Language Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Ogunsiji, Y., Farinde R.O. & Adebiyi C.O. (2012). Language, Gender and Culture. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, ISSN: 2046-9578, Vol.6 No.2 (2012)©BritishJournal Publishing, Inc. 2012, http://www.bjournal.co.uk/BJASS.aspx

Purba, L. (1996). Strategi Pemberdayaan Wanita dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Politik: Kendala Struktural dan Kultural. Makalah disampikan dalam Lokakarya Wanita dan Politik, 15 November 1996 oleh PPW Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.

Sadtono, E. (1987). Kompetensi Komunikatif: Mau ke Mana? Dalam Dardjowidjojo, S. (Ed.). Linguistik: Teori dan Terapan (hal. 133 – 160). Jakarta: Arcan.

Shallat, L. dan Paredes, U. (1995). Gender Concepts in development Planning: Basic Approach. New York: Instraw (International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Woman), United Nations.

Smith, J. S. (1992). Women in Charge: Politeness and Directives in the Speech of Japanese Women. Language in Society. Vol. 21 Number 1, March (p. 59-82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse Analysis: The Sociolinguistic of Natural Language. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um006v7i22023p375-391

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ISLLAC indexed by:

CROSSREF SINTA GARUDA GOOGLE SCHOLAR RESEARCH BIB BASE SEARCH PKP INDEX OPENARCHIVES WORLDCAT ONESEARCH

ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture
Jurusan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia (Department of Indonesian Literature, Faculty of Letters, State University of Malang, Indonesia)

ISSN : 2597-7385 (media online) - SK no. 0005.25977385/JI.3.1/SK.ISSN/2017.09 - 19 September 2017

Lisensi Creative Commons

ISLLAC : Journal of Intensive Studies on Language, Literature, Art, and Culture is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

View My Stats