PENGARUH 5E-FLIPPED CLASSROOM TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KRITIS, KETERAMPILAN BERPIKIR KREATIF, DAN HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF SISWA
Abstract
Abstract. To solve problems in the 21st century life which is full of challenges and global competition requires mastery of critical thinking skills and creative thinking. Learning that is designed must facilitate the process of constructing understanding and be able to create a positive and flexible learning environment. Flipped-Classroom 5E inquiry learning is a learning model that has a constructivist approach as well as being flexible in classroom learning. This study aims to see the effect of 5E Flipped- Classroom learning on critical thinking skills, creative thinking skills, and cognitive learning outcomes of class XI in biology learning. The research design uses a quasi-experimental non randomized control group design. Each variable was measured through pretest and posttest. The results showed that there was a positive influence of the 5E-Flipped Classroom inquiry learning model on critical thinking skills, creative thinking, and cognitive learning outcomes of students in biology learning (significance value <0.05). The 5E-Flipped Classroom inquiry learning model intervention can be used as a means for teachers to improve thinking skills as well as to improve students' academic performance in biology learning.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agnafia, D. N. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Florea : Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya, 6(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v6i1.4369
Akçayır, G., & Akçayır, M. (2018). The flipped classroom: A review of its advantages and challenges. Computers & Education, 126, 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.021
Anisa, S. I. P., Suwono, H., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2021). Entrepreneurship skills on visible creative thinking skills framework: A problem-solving idea in biology learning process. 030051. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043264
Aşıksoy, G., & Ozdamli, F. (2017). The Flipped Classroom Approach Based on the 5E Learning Cycle Model – 5ELFA. Croatian Journal of Education, 19(4), 1131–1166. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i4.2564
Astriani, D., Susilo, H., Suwono, H., Lukiati, B., & Purnomo, A. R. (2020). Mind Mapping in Learning Models: A Tool to Improve Student Metacognitive Skills. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(06), 4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i06.12657
Astuti, N. T., Prasiwi, A., & Yusuf, M. I. (2018). Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif dengan Pembelajaran Guided Discovery. 8.
Azrai, E. P., Suryanda, A., Wulaningsih, R. D., & Sumiyati, U. K. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Literasi Sains Siswa SMA di Jakarta Timur. EDUSAINS, 12(1), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v12i1.13671
Balci, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 199–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.2006.49403403199
Banul, M., Aji, S. D., & Hudha, M. N. (2019). Model CPS Melalui Saintific Approach dan Kemampuan Berpikir Reatif terhadap Pemahaman Konsep. 7.
Bono, E. D. (1982). De Bono’s Thinking Course. BBC Books.
Briggle, A., Holbrook, J. B., Oppong, J., Hoffmann, J., Larsen, E. K., & Pluscht, P. (2016). Research Ethics Education in the STEM Disciplines: The Promises and Challenges of a Gaming Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9624-6
Cakır, N. K. (2017). Effect of 5E Learning Model on Academic Achievement, Attitude and Science Process Skills: Meta-Analysis Study. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(11), 157. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i11.2649
Casakin, H. (2012). An empirical assessment of metaphor use in the design studio: Analysis, reflection and restructuring of architectural design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9149-x
Casakin, H. (2013). Metaphorical Reasoning and Design Creativity: Consequences for Practice and Education. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 1260–1267). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3858-8_436
Cherry, G. R. (n.d.). Analysis of Attitude and Achievement Using the 5E Instructional Model in an Interactive Television Environment [Old Dominion University Libraries]. https://doi.org/10.25777/Q8T3-HD18
Chiang, F.-K., & Chen, C. (2017). Modified Flipped Classroom Instructional Model in “Learning Sciences” Course for Graduate Students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 26(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-016-0321-2
Chick, R. C., Clifton, G. T., Peace, K. M., Propper, B. W., Hale, D. F., Alseidi, A. A., & Vreeland, T. J. (2020). Using Technology to Maintain the Education of Residents During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Surgical Education, 77(4), 729–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.018
Cottrell, S. (2023). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection (Fourth edition). Bloomsbury Academic.
Danisa, V. S., Dwiastuti, S., & Suciati. (2016). Pengaruh Model Guided Inquiry Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Isu-Isu Kontemporer Sains, Lingkungan, Dan Inovasi Pembelajarannya, 610–616.
Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: Co-evolution of problem–solution. Design Studies, 22(5), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00009-6
Fatmawati, A., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sutopo. (2019). Critical Thinking, Creative Thinking, and Learning Achievement: How They are Related. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1417, 012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012070
Gao, X., & Hew, K. F. (2021a). Toward a 5E-Based Flipped Classroom Model for Teaching Computational Thinking in Elementary School: Effects on Student Computational Thinking and Problem-Solving Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 073563312110377. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211037757
Gao, X., & Hew, K. F. (2021b). Toward a 5E-Based Flipped Classroom Model for Teaching Computational Thinking in Elementary School: Effects on Student Computational Thinking and Problem-Solving Performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 073563312110377. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211037757
Gazali, A., Hidayat, A., & Yuliati, L. (2015). Efektivitas Model Siklus Belajar 5E Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. 7.
Greenstein, L. (2012). Assesing 21st Century Skill: A Aguide to Evaluating mastery and Aunthentic Learnig. Corwin SAGE Publication.
Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14(8), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046827
Hardiyasa, I. M., Suma, K., & Sadia, I. W. (2014). Pengaruh Model Siklus Belajar 5E terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dan Motivasi Berprestasi Siswa. 4, 9.
Herman, T. (2016). The Enhancement of Students’ Creative Thinking Skills in Mathematics through The 5E Learning Cycle with Metacognitive Technique. 4(7), 14.
Hew, K. F., Zhu, Y., & Lo, C. K. (2018). Designing and Evaluating Postgraduate Courses Based on a 5E-Flipped Classroom Model: A Two-Case Mixed-Method Study. In S. K. S. Cheung, J. Lam, K. C. Li, O. Au, W. W. K. Ma, & W. S. Ho (Eds.), Technology in Education. Innovative Solutions and Practices (pp. 109–120). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0008-0_11
Hsia, L., Lin, Y., & Hwang, G. (2021a). A creative problem solving‐based flipped learning strategy for promoting students’ performing creativity, skills and tendencies of creative thinking and collaboration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1771–1787. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13073
Hsia, L., Lin, Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021b). A creative problem solving‐based flipped learning strategy for promoting students’ performing creativity, skills and tendencies of creative thinking and collaboration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13073
Hsia, L.-H., Lin, Y.-N., & Hwang, G.-J. (2021). A creative problem solving-based flipped learning strategy for promoting students’ performing creativity, skills and tendencies of creative thinking and collaboration. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1771–1787. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13073
Jensen, J. L., Kummer, T. A., & Godoy, P. D. d. M. (2015). Improvements from a Flipped Classroom May Simply Be the Fruits of Active Learning. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), ar5. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-08-0129
Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Pektaş, H. M. (2023). Developing students’ creative problem solving skills with inquiry-based STEM activity in an out-of-school learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7651–7669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11496-5
Kleibeuker, S. W., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Crone, E. A. (2013). The development of creative cognition across adolescence: Distinct trajectories for insight and divergent thinking: Creative cognition across adolescence. Developmental Science, 16(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01176.x
Kustandi, C., Wargahadibrata, R. A. H., & Situmorang, R. (n.d.). The Innovation of Blended Learning in Flipped Classroom Type to Increase Students’ Learning Independence. 372, 8.
Larson, L. C., & Miller, T. N. (2012). Larson2011.pdf. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 3(43), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00228958.2011.10516575
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2016). Practical research: Planning and design (Eleventh edition). Pearson.
Lestari, D. G., & Irawati, H. (2020). Literature Review: Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Kognitif Dan Motivasi Siswa Pada Materi Biologi Melalui Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry. 2(2).
Madyani, I., Yamtinah, S., & Utomo, S. B. (2019). Profile of Creative Thinking Skills on Junior High School Students in Science Learning by Gender. Scientiae Educatia, 8(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i2.5315
Maghfiroh, N., Susilo, H., & Gofur, A. (2016). Pengaruh Project Based Learning terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa Kelas X SMA Negeri Sidoarjo. 1(2016), 1588–1593.
McCuen, R. H. (2023). Critical thinking, idea innovation, and creativity (First edition). CRC Press.
Miarti, E., Hasnunidah, N., & Abdurrahman, A. (2021). The Effect of Learning Cycle 5E on Critical Thinking Skills for Junior High School Students. Scientiae Educatia, 10(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v10i2.9127
Nafi’ah, I., & Prasetyo, A. P. B. (2015). Analisis Kebiasaan Berpikir Kritis Siswa saat Pembelajaran IPA Kurikulum 2013 Berpendekatan Scientific. 7.
Nerantzi, C. (2020). The Use of Peer Instruction and Flipped Learning to Support Flexible Blended Learning During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 7(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.72.20-013
Novianti, A., Noor, M. F., & Susanti, B. H. (2015). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle terhadap Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. EDUSAINS, 6(1), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v6i1.1105
Omotayo, S. A., & Adeleke, J. O. (2017). The 5e Instructional Model: A Constructivist Approach for Enhancing Students’ Learning Outcomes in Mathematics. 21(2), 12.
Ozdamli, F., & Asiksoy, G. (2016). Flipped Classroom Approach. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 8(2), 98–105. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v8i2.640
Panjaitan, M. B., Nur, M., & Jatmiko, B. (2015). Model Pembelajaran Sains Berbasis Proses Kreatif-Inkuiri untuk Meningkatkan Berpikir Kreatif dan Pemahaman Konsep SiswA SMP. 15.
Purnomo, R. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri dengan Model The 5 E Learning Cycle dapat Meningkatkan Keaktifan Belajar dan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Belantika Pendidikan, 2(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.47213/bp.v2i2.32
Rahayu, S., Setyosari, P., Hidayat, A., & Kuswandi, D. (2022). The Effectiveness of Creative Problem Solving-Flipped Classroom for Enhancing Students’ Creative Thinking Skills of Online Physics Educational Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(4), Art. 4. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i4.39709
Retnosari, N., Susilo, H., & Suwono, H. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Multimedia Interaktif terhadap Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri di Bojonegoro. 1(8), 1529–1535.
Ruiz-Martín, H., & Bybee, R. W. (2022). The cognitive principles of learning underlying the 5E Model of Instruction. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00337-z
Rustaman, N. Y. (2011a). Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sains dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi untuk Pembangunan Karakter. 8(1), 15–34.
Rustaman, N. Y. (2011b). Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sains dalam Mengembangkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi untuk Pembangunan Karakter. 8(1), 15–34.
Sachyani, D., Waxman, P. T., Sadeh, I., Herman, S., Levi Ferber, M., Yaacobi, M., Choresh, O., Link, E., Masa, S.-R., Ginsburg, S., & Zion, M. (2023). Teachers’ views of Future-Oriented Pedagogy as part of inquiry-based molecular biology teaching in high school biology laboratories. Journal of Biological Education, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2174157
Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, & Rinanto, Y. (2018). Critical thinking skills profile of senior high school students in Biology learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1006, 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1006/1/012002
Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K–12 Blended Learning. 22.
Sudarisman, S. (2015). Memahami Hakikat dan Karakteristik Pembelajaran Biologi dalam Upaya Menjawab Tantangan Abad 21 Serta Optimalisasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Florea : Jurnal Biologi dan Pembelajarannya, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.25273/florea.v2i1.403
Suebsom, K. (2020). The use of blended learning: Social media and Flipped Classroom to encourage Thinking skills and Collaborate Work in Higher Education. Proceedings of the 2020 the 3rd International Conference on Computers in Management and Business, 201–206. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383845.3383883
Susilowati, S. M. E., & Anam, K. (2017). Improving Students’ Scientific Reasoning and Problem-Solving Skills by The 5E Learning Model. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(3), 506. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v9i3.12022
Suwono, H., Rofi’Ah, N. L., Saefi, M., & Fachrunnisa, R. (2021). Interactive socio-scientific inquiry for promoting scientific literacy, enhancing biological knowledge, and developing critical thinking. Journal of Biological Education, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.2006270
Sya’roni, A. R., Inawati, P. A., Guswanto, E., Susanto, & Hobri. (2020). Students’ creative thinking skill in the flipped classroom-blended learning of mathematics based on lesson study for learning community. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563, 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012046
Tang, T., Abuhmaid, A. M., Olaimat, M., Oudat, D. M., Aldhaeebi, M., & Bamanger, E. (2020). Efficiency of flipped classroom with online-based teaching under COVID-19. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1817761
Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. 98.
Utami, D. N., & Subali, B. (2020). 5E learning cycle combined with mind mapping in excretory system: Effectiveness on curiosity. Biosfer, 13(1), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.v13n1.130-142
Van der Leij, T., Goedhart, M., Avraamidou, L., & Wals, A. (2023). Designing a module for supporting secondary biology students’ morality through socioscientific issues in the human-nature context. Journal of Biological Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2023.2174160
Wei, X., Cheng, I.-L., Chen, N.-S., Yang, X., Liu, Y., Dong, Y., Zhai, X., & Kinshuk. (2020). Effect of the flipped classroom on the mathematics performance of middle school students. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1461–1484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09752-x
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um052v15i1p9-24
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Biology Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Malang,Building O-5 Jl. Cakrawala No.2 Malang 65145 Tel / Fax. (0341) 588077 (direct), (0341) 551312 line 262
E-mail: jpb.journal@um.ac.id
Web: s.id/JPB