Arus Utama Wacana Identitas Penghayat Kepercayaan Pasca Putusan MK di Media Daring Kompas.com

Akil Fitra Sholakodin

Abstract


Pemberitaan tentang penghayat kepercayaan meningkat drastis sejak Putusan MK Nomor 97/PUU- XIV/2016 di sahkan tahun 2017. Pemberitaan ini tersebar dalam surat kabar, berita televisi dan artikel berita daring seperti Kompas.com, Suara Merdeka, Detik dan Republika. Pemberitaan yang memuat isu sensitif tentang formalisasi identitas penghayat kepercayaan kemudian menjadi perhatian publik. Penelitian ini kemudian difokuskan pada wacana yang muncul dalam pemberitaan identitas penghayat kepercayaan di Kompas.com. Pendekatan penelitian dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Sumber data diambil pada artikel berita Kompas.com pada kurun waktu 7 November 2017 sampai Desember 2021. Analisis data dilakukan dengan memadukan Textual Network Analysis (TNA) dan Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) dengan bantuan software NVIVO, WordIJ dan Gephi. Hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa formalisasi identitas penghayat kepercayaan masih mengalami hambatan dalam konteks diskriminasi dan eksklusi yang masih terjadi dan dilakukan oleh kelompok mayoritas. Kedua, wacana yang terbangun dalam pemberitaan Kompas.com terdiri dari lima pokok yang secara umum mendorong komitmen pemerintah dalam implementasi formalisasi identitas penghayat kepercayaan. Walaupun di dalamnya masih memunculkan kontrol absolut dari negara terkait dengan kemerdekaan dan kesetaraan dalam memeluk kepercayaan dan agama.


Reports about believers have drastically increased since the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 97/PUU-XIV/2016 was ratified in 2017. This news is spread in newspapers, television news, and online news articles such as Kompas.com, Suara Merdeka, Detik, and Republika. Reports that contain sensitive issues regarding the formalization of the identity of believers then become public attention. This research is then focused on the discourse that appears in the news on the identity of believers in Kompas.com. The research approach uses qualitative methods with descriptive research types. The data source was taken from a news article from Kompas.com from November 7, 2017, to December 2021. Data analysis was carried out by combining Textual Network Analysis (TNA) and Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with the help of NVIVO, WordIJ, and Gephi software. The results of the study show that the formalization of the identity of believers in belief still faces obstacles in the context of discrimination and exclusion that still occur and are carried out by the majority group. Second, the discourse that was developed in the Kompas.com news coverage consisted of five main points that in general encouraged the government's commitment to the implementation of the formalization of the identity of believers. Although in it still raises absolute control of the state related to independence and equality in embracing beliefs and religions.


Keywords


penghayat kepercayaan; identitas; putusan MK; TNA; CDA

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adzkiya, U., & Fadhilah, I. (2020). Inklusi Sosial Penghayat Kepercayaan; Upaya Mendorong Hak Warga Negara Penganut Kepercayaan Sedulur Sikep Kudus. At-Taqaddum, 12(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.21580/at.v12i1.5622

Al Qurtuby, S., & Kholiludin, T. (2019). Agama dan Kepercayaan Nusantara.

Annisa, R. (2021). Digital feminist activism : Analyzing Jakarta Feminist as a collective identity , resources , network , information dissemination , and mobilization Aktivisme feminis digital : Menganalisis Jakarta Feminist sebagai identitas. 1998(Suwana 2020), 175–186.

Askew, R., & Williams, L. (2021). Rethinking enhancement substance use: A critical discourse studies approach. International Journal of Drug Policy, 95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102994

Bagir, Z. A., Hefner, R. W., & Ali-fauzi, I. (2014). Mengelola Keragaman dan Kebebasan Beragama di Indonesia: Sejarah, Teori dan Advokasi [Managing Diversity and Religious Freedom in Indonesia: History, Theory and Advocacy]. CRCS UGM, 1–138.

Baskoro, A. (2020). Mewujudkan Social Inclusion: Kontribusi Satunama terhadap Penghayat Kepercayaan di Yogyakarta. Panangkaran: Jurnal Penelitian Agama Dan Masyarakat, 3(2), 181. https://doi.org/10.14421/panangkaran.2019.0302-03

Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J. L., Lambiotte, R., & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2008(10). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008

Bustami, A. L. (2005). Tuhan Agama Mu Apa? Realisasi Kuasa Republik dan Keyakinan Keagamaan. In Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa Dalam Sebuah Realita (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 1–50). Departemen Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata.

Bustami, A. L. (2014). Sejarah Direktorat Pembinaan Kepercayaan terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa dan Tradisi. Direktorat Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa.

Crouch, M. (2013). Shifting conceptions of state regulation of religion: The Indonesian Draft Law on Inter-religious Harmony. Global Change, Peace and Security, 25(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2013.764859

Drabu, O. (2018). Who is the Muslim? Discursive representations of the Muslims and Islam in Indian prime-time news. Religions, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9090283

Eddington, S. M. (2018). The Communicative Constitution of Hate Organizations Online: A Semantic Network Analysis of “Make America Great Again.” Social Media and Society, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118790763

Faircloucgh, N. (2012). Critical Discourse Analysis. The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835654

Featherstone, J. D., Ruiz, J. B., Barnett, G. A., & Millam, B. J. (2020). Exploring childhood vaccination themes and public opinions on Twitter: A semantic network analysis. Telematics and Informatics, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101474

Firdaus, A. (2019). )Politik Rekognisi Penghayat (Sarasehan Nasional Penghayat). In IJIR.

Fronzetti Colladon, A., & Naldi, M. (2019). Predicting the performance of TV series through textual and network analysis: The case of Big Bang Theory. PLoS ONE, 14(11), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225306

Gloria, K. G., Ewing, N. S., Mackey, L., JTSchlitt, Marathe, A., Abbas, K., & Swarup, S. (2018). Semantic Network Analysis of Vaccine Sentiment in Online Social Media. Vaccine, 176(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.052.Semantic

Granovetter, M. S. (2018). The Strength of Weak Ties. In Inequality in the 21st Century. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499821-43

Gruzd, A., & Mai, P. (2020). Going viral: How a single tweet spawned a COVID-19 conspiracy theory on Twitter. Big Data and Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720938405

Hamad, I. (2004). Konstruksi Realitas Politik Dalam Media Massa (Studi Pesan Politik Dalam Media Cetak Pada Masa Pemilu 1999). Makara Human Behavior Studies in Asia, 8(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v8i1.77

Hamudy, M. I. A., & Rifki, M. S. (2020). Civil Rights of the Believers of Unofficial Religions (Penghayat Kepercayaan) in Pekalongan District. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 22(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v22.n1.p48-59.2020

Hefner, R. W. (2021). Islam and institutional religious freedom in indonesia. Religions, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060415

Hernandi, A. (2014). Eksistensi, Organisasi, dan Kehidupan Penghayat Kepercayaan terhadap Tuhan Yang Maha Esa. 1–11.

Hernandi, A. (2016). Nilai-nilai Ajaran Kepercayaan terhadap Tuhan YME sebagai Rujukan Pembentukan Karakter Bangsa. MLKI, 30, 1–11.

Hertz, J. C. (2014). Sekularisme dan Hak-Hak Individu dalam Usaha Melawan Diskriminasi Rasial dan Etnis di Indonesia. Antropologi Indonesia, 0(72), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.7454/ai.v0i72.3474

Jiang, K., Barnett, G. A., & Taylor, L. D. (2016). Dynamics of culture frames in international news coverage: A semantic network analysis. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3710–3736.

Kang, G. J., Ewing-Nelson, S. R., Mackey, L., Schlitt, J. T., Marathe, A., Abbas, K. M., & Swarup, S. (2017). Semantic network analysis of vaccine sentiment in online social media. Vaccine, 35(29). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.05.052

Karman, K. (2014). Media Massa dan Konstruksi Realitas (Analisis Framing Terhadap Pemberitaan SKB Menteri Tentang Ahmadiyah di Indonesia pada Suratkabar Harian Suara Pembaruan dan Republika). In Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media (Vol. 17, Issue 2, p. 173). https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2013.170205

Kholik, S., & Azhari, A. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis Normatif Tentang Pengisian Kolom Agama Dalam Identitas Kependudukan Berdasarkan Pasal 61 Ayat (2) Undang – Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 Tentang Administrasi Kependudukan Dikaitkan dengan Keberadaan Komunitas Dayak Hindhu – Buddha Bumi Segan. HERMENEUTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33603/hermeneutika.v2i2.1564

Laelafitrianisahronie. (2021). Antara Agama dan Kepercayaan :Menguji Praktik Kewargaan Ingenious Paguyuban Ngesti Tunggal (Pangestu). In The Asia Foundation.

López Maestre, M. D. (2020). Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt. Complutense Journal of English Studies, 28, 191–206. https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.68355

Maarif, S., Mubarok, H., Sahroni, L. F., & Roessusita, D. (2019). Merangkul Penghayat Kepercayaan Melalui Advokasi Inklusi Sosial: Belajar dari Pengalaman Pendampingan.

Mahestu, G. (2018). Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic Era. E3S Web of Conferences, 73, 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187314016

Martin Jr, T. E. (2014). Framing the discourse of leadership : An analysis of the social consruction of leadership within communication, business and higher education. The University of Alabama.

Morris, A. (2015). This product made from postconsumer content: Narrative recycling and new novelistic economies. Criticism, 57(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.13110/criticism.57.1.0001

Muhammaditya, N., & Hardjosoekarto, S. (2021). Divergensi Transformasi Digital Pengelolaan Bank Soal Era Masyarakat 5.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 6, 54–77.

Mustolehudin, M., & Muawanah, S. (2017). Polemik Pengisian Kolom Agama di KTP bagi Penganut Aliran Kepercayaan (Studi Pada Media Cetak, On-Line, dan Media Sosial Bulan November 2014) Polemics of Filling Out Column on Identity Card For Faith Followers (A Study of Print, On-Line, and Social Media. Jurnal SMART (Studi Masyarakat, Religi, Dan Tradisi), 3(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.18784/smart.v3i2.494

Mutaqin, Z. Z. (2014). Penghayat, orthodoxy and the legal politics of the state: The survival of Agama Djawa Sunda (Madraisism) in Indonesia. Indonesia and the Malay World, 42(122), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2014.870771

Oh, M. (Moon), & Kim, S. (Sam). (2020). Dimensionality of ethnic food fine dining experience: An application of semantic network analysis. Tourism Management Perspectives, 35(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100719

Palys, T., Columbia, B., & Atchison, C. (2012). Qualitative Research in the Digital Era: Obstacles and Opportunities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 352–367.

Philo, G. (2007). Can discourse analysis successfully explain the content of media and journalistic practice? Journalism Studies, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700601148804

Picard, M., & Madinier, R. (2011). The politics of religion in Indonesia: Syncretism, orthodoxy, and religious contention in Java and Bali. In The Politics of Religion in Indonesia: Syncretism, Orthodoxy, and Religious Contention in Java and Bali. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203817049

Pratiwi, A. (2018). Konstruksi realitas dan media massa (analisis framing pemberitaan LGBT di republika dan BBC news, model Robert N. Entman). Jurnal Bahasa, Peradaban Dan Informasi Islam, 19(1), 1–22.

Puji, S. (2016). Konstruksi Sosial Media Massa Puji Santoso Dosen Komunikasi Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara. Al-Balagh, 1(1), 34.

Rahmawati, A. Y. (2020). Terorisme dalam Konstruksi Media Massa. Jrmdk, 2(1), 38–51.

Ramstedt, M. (2019). Politics of Taxonomy in Postcolonial Indonesia: Ethnic Traditions between Religionisation and Secularisation. Historical Social Research, 44(3), 264–289. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.44.2019.3.264-289

Segev, E. (2020). Textual network analysis. Detecting prevailing themes and biases in international news and social media copy 2.pdf. Sociology Compass.

Shin, Y. (2020). What can tripartite semantic network analysis do for media framing research? Communication and Society, 33(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.33.1.121-137

Silaban, R., Gustiranda, P., & Agung, U. D. (2020). Kebangkitan Hak-Hak Sipil Penghayat Kepercayaan Parmalim Pasca Pasal 61 Ayat (1) Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 97/Puu-Xiv/2016 di Kota Medan. 2(1), 75–84.

Stella, M. (2020). Text-mining forma mentis networks reconstruct public perception of the STEM gender gap in social media. PeerJ Computer Science, 6. https://doi.org/10.7717/PEERJ-CS.295

Sukirno, S. (2019). Politik Hukum Pengakuan Hak atas Administrasi Kependudukan Bagi Penganut Penghayat Kepercayaan. Administrative Law and Governance Journal, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.268-281

Susilo, D. (2021). Analisis Wacana Kritis Van Dijk: Sebuah Model dan Tinjauan Kritis pada Media Daring. In Unitomo Press (Issue July, pp. 1–23).

Van Dijk, T. (2008). Discourse and Context. In Cambridge University Press.

Van Dijk, T. (2014). Discourse and Knowledge: A Sociocognitive Approach. In Cambridge University Press.

Viri, K., & Febriany, Z. (2020). Dinamika Pengakuan Penghayat Kepercayaan di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 2(2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v2i2.119

Xiong, Y., Cho, M., & Boatwright, B. (2019). Hashtag activism and message frames among social movement organizations: Semantic network analysis and thematic analysis of Twitter during the #MeToo movement. Public Relations Review, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.10.014




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um021v6i2p166-182

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis

Editorial Office:
Sociology Program, Faculty of Social Science, Universitas Negeri Malang
Semarang St. No. 5 Building I3-101 65145.
Phone. (0341) 551312. line. 375, 376 (20)
Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jsph/index
email: jsphum@yahoo.co.id

ISSN 2502-7875 (printed)
ISSN 2527-5879 (online)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.