Email this article 
Hide
Show all
2.png){kind=logo}
KOHESI GRAMATIKAL: KAJIAN KEUTUHAN WACANA TUGAS MAHASISWA PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SASTRA INDONESIA, FAKULTAS BAHASA DAN SASTRA, UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MAKASSAR
Abstract
Abstract: This study aims to elaborate on the use of grammatical cohesion student assignment. The research method is content analysis. Data source is the text contained in the student assignment Indonesian Language and Literature Education. The data in the form of grammatical cohesion. Data analysed with the method content analysis. The results showed that: first, the pronouns. The use of pronouns we and they are often used in stringing sentences students conducted again. Second, the substitution. Substitution that occurs in the tasks students are generally limited to the replacement of the word or group of words with pronouns. Third, the elepsis. Elepsis in student assignments sometimes occur due to the removal of appropriate words must be present in the sentence. Fourth, conjunctions. Conjunctions are used in student writing right there and some are not appropriate. This is caused by a lack of understanding of student use of conjunctions
Permalink/DOI: dx.doi.org/10.17977/um015v45i22017p170
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alek. 2009. “Keutuhan Wacana Buku Teks Bahasa Inggris SMA Karya Penulis Indonesia Ditinjau dari Aspek Koherensi”. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra. PPs UNJ Jakarta, hlm. 73.
Alwi, Hasan dkk. 2003. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Beaugrande, Robert-Alain de dan Dressler, Wolfgang. 1987. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman.
Darmawati. 2012. Kohesi dan Koherensi Wacana Narasi dalam Modul Karya Guru. Retorika: Jurnal Bahasa, Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya. Volume 8, Agustus 2012.
Djajasudarma, T. Fatimah. 2009. Wacana: Pemahaman dan Hubungan Antarunsur. Bandung: PT Eresco.
Fairclough, N. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. New York: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. 2005. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London and New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M.A.K. 2005. On Grammar. London and New York. Continuum.
Hudson, R. 2003. English Grammar. London and New York: Routledge.
Kartomihardjo, S. 1993. “Analisis Wacana dengan Penerapannya pada Beberapa Wacana”. Dalam Bambang Kaswanti Purwo (ed.). Pellba 6. Jakarta: Lembaga Bahasa Unika Atma Jaya.
Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 2001. Kamus Linguistik. Edisi Ketiga. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Kroeger, Paul R. 2005. Analyzing Grammar An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tarigan, H. G. 2009. Pengajaran Wacana. Bandung: Angkasa.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2008. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yule, George. 2006. The Study of Language. Third Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Dear Sir/Madam
We appreciate your continued confidence and trust in Bahasa dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, dan Pengajarannya (JBS). In order to enhance the service, readability, and quality of JBS publications, we will be transitioning to a new website, https://citeus.um.ac.id/jbs, in collaboration with Digital Commons (Elsevier) starting in July 2024.
Sincerely
Yusuf Hanafi
(Editor in chief)