Towards Improving Welding Skills: Creating Innovative Modules For Teaching SMAW Integrated 3D Animation

Yunus Yunus, Theodorus Wiyanto Wibowo, Rizdana Galih Pambudi, Aji Catur Prayogo

Abstract


This research aims to develop teaching modules on welding techniques in vocational schools using the problem-based learning (PBL) model, a scientific learning approach, and an authentic assessment of welding competency using the manual arc welding or SMAW welding process. The development of teaching modules at vocational schools will improve the quality of the process and the quality of learning outcomes for SMAW welding engineering subjects at vocational schools. This research uses a development research method with a research design using design-based research (DBR), which refers to the instructional design model (IDM) development model design. The participants involved in this research were class XI vocational school students in East Java. The module validity test assessment results have an average score of 3.8 in the very valid category. The SMAW welding technique module that has been prepared can be used to implement SMAW welding technique learning at vocational schools. The teaching module evaluation stage results show an outstanding category, meaning the teaching module developed meets practical requirements. All students' average normalized gain score was 0.72, included in the high improvement category. The results of observations of the implementation of the PBL model facilitated by teaching modules from two observers were analyzed using percentages of agreement (PA). The research conclusion shows that the teaching module developed is valid, practical, and effective

Keywords


welding skills; 3D animation; welding SMAW; modules

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afacan, Ö., & Demirbaş, M. (2013). The problems that science and technology teachers face in science laboratories. Balkan Physics Letters, 21(211006), 51–64.

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Arends, Richard. (2015). Learning to teach (10th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.

Bag, S., Gupta, S., & Kumar, S. (2021). Industry 4.0 adoption and 10R advance manufacturing capabilities for sustainable development. International Journal of Production Economics, 231, 107844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107844

Black, W., & Babin, B. J. (2019). Multivariate data analysis: Its approach, evolution, and impact. In The Great Facilitator (pp. 121–130). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06031-2_16

Boublil, S., Blair, D., & Treagust, D. F. (2024). Design and implementation of an einsteinian energy learning module. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 22(1), 49–72. https://doi.-org/10.1007/s10763-022-10348-5

Bozkurt, A., & Bozkaya, M. (2015). Evaluation criteria for interactive e-books for open and distance learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.¬19¬17-3/¬irrodl.v16i5.2218

Care, E. (2018). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (E. Care, P. Griffin, & M. Wilson, Eds.). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/¬10.-1007/978-3-319-65368-6

Chan, C., & Fok, W. (2009). Evaluating learning experiences in virtual laboratory training through student perceptions: a case study in Electrical and Electronic Engineering at the University of Hong Kong. Engineering Education, 4(2), 70–75. https:¬//doi.¬org/-10.¬11120/ened.2009.04020070

Çırakoğlu, N., Toksoy, S. E., & Reisoğlu, İ. (2022). Designing, developing, and evaluating an interactive e-book based on the predict-observe-explain (POE) method. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 6(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-022-00¬071-3

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Connor, C. M., Day, S. L., Zargar, E., Wood, T. S., Taylor, K. S., Jones, M. R., & Hwang, J. K. (2019). Building word knowledge, learning strategies, and metacognition with the Word-Knowledge e-book. Computers & Education, 128, 284–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.016

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.

Dunne, J., & Ryan, B. (2010). Improving the undergraduate laboratory learning experience through redesigned teaching and assessment strategies integrating transferable skills and focusing on feedback. Teaching Fellowships, 46–52.

Eggen, P., & Kauchack, D. (2020). Using educational psychology in teaching (11th ed.). Pearson.

Gong, C., Chen, G., Wang, X., Zhang, X., & Huang, R. (2013). The functions of e-textbooks for utilizing in K-12 classes: A case study in Beijing. 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 479–480. https://doi.org/10.¬1109/¬icalt.¬2013.151

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics tests data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.¬org/¬10.¬1119/1.18809

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. Commu-nication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Jamali, S. M., Ale Ebrahim, N., & Jamali, F. (2023). The role of STEM Education in improving the quality of education: a bibliometric study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(3), 819–840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09762-1

Krawitz, J., Chang, Y.-P., Yang, K.-L., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). The role of reading comprehension in mathematical modeling: improving the construction of a real-world model and interest in Germany and Taiwan. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 337–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10058-9

Kumar, S., Sharma, K., Mishra, V., & Maan, V. (2023). A structural model of Welding 4.0 implementation challenges. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM). https://¬doi.-org/10.1007/s12008-023-01660-7

Liang, T. H. (2015). The effects of keyword cues and 3R strategy on children’s e‐book reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(2), 176–187. https:-//doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12072

Malkewitz, C. P., Schwall, P., Meesters, C., & Hardt, J. (2023). Estimating reliability: A comparison of Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ωt, and the greatest lower bound. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100368

Marlena, N., Patrikha, F. D., & Dwijayanti, R. (2022). Electronic modules in an Indonesian higher education: conceptualization, development, and application. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(3), 3943–3954. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.-v14i3.¬14¬73

Mohammed, L. A., Aljaberi, M. A., Amidi, A., Abdulsalam, R., Lin, C. Y., Hamat, R. A., & Abdallah, A. M. (2022). Exploring factors affecting graduate students’ satisfaction toward e-learning in the era of the COVID-19 crisis. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 12(8), 1121–1142. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12080079

Nardo, Ma. T. B. N. (2017). Modular Instruction Enhances Learner Autonomy. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(10).

Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2018). Curricular and Implementation Challenges in Introducing Twenty-First Century Skills in Education (pp. 259–276). https://¬doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65368-6_15

Paladines, J., Ramírez, J., & Berrocal-Lobo, M. (2023). Integrating a dialog system with an intelligent tutoring system for a 3D virtual laboratory. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4476–4489. https://¬doi.-org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1972012

Panebianco, C. J., Nijsure, M. P., Berlew, E. E., Jeong, A. L., & Boerckel, J. D. (2024). Adjusting to your surroundings: An inquiry-based learning module to teach principles of mechanobiology for regenerative medicine. Biomedical Engineering Education, 4(1), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43683-023-00130-6

Papadopoulou, T. (2020). Developing construction graduates fit for the 4th industrial revolution through fieldwork application of active learning. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.¬1080/¬23752696.2020.1816844

Pranowo, T. A., Febrianto, A., & Basri, A. I. (2022). Peningkatan pemahaman dan perencanaan karir siswa SMK melalui layanan informasi. IJOCS: Indonesian Journal of Community Service, 2(3).

Sakti, P. W., & Nuryanto, A. (2020). Pengaruh PKL terhadap kesiapan kerja siswa kelas XII Teknik Pemesinan B SMK Nasional Berbah. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasional Teknik Mesin, 8(1).

Schmidt, H. G., Van Der Molen, H. T., Te Winkel, W. W. R., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2011). Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: A meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213592

Sharma, M., Gupta, R., & Acharya, P. (2020). Factors influencing cloud computing adoption for higher educational institutes in India: A fuzzy AHP approach. Journal of Information Technology and Management, 19(2–3), 126–150.

Sharma, M., Gupta, R., & Acharya, P. (2021). Analyzing the adoption of cloud computing service: a systematic literature review. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(1/2), 114–153. https://¬doi.¬org/-10.¬1108/gkmc-10-2019-0126

Sharma, M., Sehrawat, R., Giannakis, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2023). Learnings from Industry 4.0 for transitioning towards Industry 4.0+: challenges and solutions for Indian pharmaceutical sector. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-023-05391-6

Soetrisno, B. (2015). Indonesia sangat kekurangan tukang las atau welder untuk memenuhi kebtuhan industri besat, yakni mengelas galangan kapal, pipa minyak, dan bagian kapal di bawah air. Kompas.Com.

Wang, R., Liu, C., & Ma, T. (2018). Evaluation of a virtual neurophysiology laboratory as a new pedagogical tool for medical undergraduate students in China. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(4), 704–710. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00088.2018

Wensveen, S., & Matthews, B. (2014). Prototypes and prototyping in design research (Paul A. Rodgers & Joyce Yee, Eds.). Routledge Companion to Design Research.

Wijnia, L., Noordzij, G., Arends, L. R., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Loyens, S. M. M. (2024). The Effects of Problem-Based, Project-Based, and Case-Based Learning on Students’ Motivation: a Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), 29. https://doi.¬org/¬10.¬10-07/¬s10648-024-09864-3

Wu, T.-T., & Chen, A.-C. (2018). Combining e-books with mind mapping in a reciprocal teaching strategy for a classical Chinese course. Computers & Education, 116, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.-2017.¬08.012

Yalcin-Celik, A., Kadayifci, H., Uner, S., & Turan-Oluk, N. (2017). Challenges faced by pre-service chemistry teachers teaching in a laboratory and their solution proposals. European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(2), 210–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/¬02619¬768.-20¬17.1284792.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um048v30i1p79-89

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
ISSN: 0215-9643 | E-ISSN: 2442-8655
Contact
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)
Graha Rektorat, Floor 6, Jl. Semarang No 5 Malang 65145
Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jip
E-mail: jip@um.ac.id

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats