Enhancing Spatial Literacy through ClassPoint-Integrated Geometry Learning: A Quasi-Experimental StudyType
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abumosa, M. (2024). University Students’ Perspectives on the Use of Interactive Presentation Technologies. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 8(4), 645–667. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.579
Adams, J., Resnick, I., & Lowrie, T. (2023). Supporting senior high-school students’ measurement and geometry performance: Does spatial training transfer to mathematics achievement? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00416-y
Barbetta, P. M. (2023). Technologies as Tools to Increase Active Learning During Online Higher-Education Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 51(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395221143969
Birgin, O., & Acar, H. (2020). The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning using GeoGebra software on 11th grade students’ mathematics achievement in exponential and logarithmic functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1788186
Bistron, J., & Schwering, A. (2024). Assessing navigational map reading competencies with the location-based GeoGame “GeoGami.” Journal of Geoscience Education, 72(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2023.2190830
Bong, E. Y., & Chatterjee, C. (2022a). The Use of a ClassPoint Tool for Student Engagement During Online Lesson. The Asian Conference on Education 2021: Official Conference Proceedings, 501–509. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2022.39
Bong, E. Y., & Chatterjee, C. (2022b). The Use of a ClassPoint Tool for Student Engagement During Online Lesson. The Asian Conference on Education 2021: Official Conference Proceedings, 501–509. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2186-5892.2022.39
Bris, A., Wang, T. Y. H., Zatzick, C. D., Miller, D. J. P., Fern, M. J., Cardinal, L. B., Gregoire, D. A., Shepherd, D. A., Westphal, J. D., Shani, G., Troster, C., Van Quaquebeke, N., Lanaj, K., Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Barnes, C. M., Harmon, S. J., Feldman, E. R., DesJardine, M. R., … Sangiorgi, F. (2021). Knights, raiders, and targets - the impact of the hostile takeover - coffee,jc, lowenstein,l, roseackerman,s. Journal of banking & finance, 37(1).
Crompton, H., & Ferguson, S. (2024). An analysis of the essential understandings in elementary geometry and a comparison to the common core standards with teaching implications. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(2), 258–275. https://doi.org/10.30935/scimath/14361
Del Cerro Velázquez, F., & Méndez, G. M. (2021). Application in augmented reality for learning mathematical functions: A study for the development of spatial intelligence in secondary education students. Mathematics, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9040369
Demitriadou, E., Stavroulia, K. E., & Lanitis, A. (2020). Comparative evaluation of virtual and augmented reality for teaching mathematics in primary education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09973-5
Ellinger, J., Mess, F., Bachner, J., von Au, J., & Mall, C. (2023). Changes in social interaction, social relatedness, and friendships in Education Outside the Classroom: A social network analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1031693
Frick, A. (2019). Spatial transformation abilities and their relation to later mathematics performance. Psychological Research, 83(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1008-5
Frisnoiry, S., Surya, E., Siregar, T., Elfitra, E., & Sahela, S. (2024). Application of Class Points as a Form of Spatial Literacy. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.24-10-2023.2341909
Fujita, T., Kondo, Y., Kumakura, H., Kunimune, S., & Jones, K. (2020). Spatial reasoning skills about 2D representations of 3D geometrical shapes in grades 4 to 9. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00335-w
Glasnović Gracin, D., & Kuzle, A. (2024). Diversity and Coherence as Important Aspects of Curriculum: A Content Analysis of the Two Croatian Geometry Curricula for Primary Education. Croatian Journal of Education, 26(1), 59–95. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v26i1.4984
Godsk, M., & Møller, K. L. (2024). Engaging students in higher education with educational technology. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12901-x
Gunčaga, J., & Záhorec, J. (2024). STEM Education Using Digital Tools in Undergraduate Teacher Education. In L. Tomczyk (Ed.), Communications in Computer and Information Science: Vol. 2130 CCIS (pp. 336–350). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63235-8_22
Harris, D. (2023). Spatial reasoning in context: bridging cognitive and educational perspectives of spatial-mathematics relations. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1302099
Hidayat, I. M., Siregar, E. S., Hasibuan, S. A., Ika Purnama Sari, & Anggraini, Y. (2023). The implementation of classpoint in learning english: a case study at smk muhammadiyah 3 karanganyar on eleventh grade in academic year 2021/2022. JISAE: Journal of Indonesian Student Assessment and Evaluation, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/jisae.v9i2.36808
Hollebrands, K. F. (2003). High school student’s understanding of geometric transformation in the context of a technological environment. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(03)00004-X
Jiménez-Vilcherrez, J., Castillo-Aguilera, E., Vicente-Morocho, A., Velezmoro-León, R., & Ipanaqué-Chero, R. (2023). Meaningful Learning of University Students About the Normal Curvature of the Implicitly Given Hyperbolic Paraboloid Based on GeoGebra. In H. Cardona-Reyes, C. A. Lara-Alvarez, M. A. Ortiz-Esparza, & K. O. Villalba-Condori (Eds.), CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 3691, pp. 285–293). CEUR-WS. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85194703036&partnerID=40&md5=ef00fc5ccf9c9f8550763b3387c4cb22
Koparan, T., Dinar, H., Koparan, E. T., & Haldan, Z. S. (2023). Integrating augmented reality into mathematics teaching and learning and examining its effectiveness. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101245
Lane, D., Lynch, R., & McGarr, O. (2019). Problematizing spatial literacy within the school curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 29(4), 685–700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9467-y
Limbong, E., & Wadham, B. (2024). Exploring Pre-Service English Teachers’ Digital Competence in Creating Interactive Instructional Materials. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(2), 748–767. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i2.35103
Mazlan, N. A., Tan, K. H., Othman, Z., & Wahi, W. (2023). ClassPoint Application for Enhancing Motivation in Communication among ESL Young Learners. World Journal of English Language, 13(5), 520–526. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n5p520
Menouer, B., Faouzi, L., Ou Zennou, F., Sbaa, M., & Nachit, B. (2024). Effects of employing mind mapping techniques in geometry instruction on logical thinking abilities. International Journal on Technical and Physical Problems of Engineering, 16(3), 220–226. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85205994978&partnerID=40&md5=1dd2e12c09f72b430b28dc52ed363ee9
Mjenda, M., Mutarutinya, V., & Owiti, D. (2023). Assessing the Effectiveness of Computer-Aided Instructional Techniques in Enhancing Students’ 3D Geometry Spatial Visualization Skills Among Secondary School Students in Tanzania. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22(6). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.22.6.31
Mustopa, Nasikhin, Chamami, R., Nihayah, H., Habibullah, M. R., & Manshur, A. (2024). Challenges in Artificial Intelligence Development in Higher Education in China, India, and Indonesia: International Students’ Perspectives. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.2.17
Paulino, A., Babb, P., & Tay, M. K. (2023). Measuring longitudinal performance at the math minds initiative: an intervention at the elementary level. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1.
Poddar, K., Pathania, M., & Singh, C. P. (2024). Efficacy of an Augmented Reality Application for Enhanced Learning of 3D Geometric Shapes. 2024 International Conference on Emerging Smart Computing and Informatics, ESCI 2024. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESCI59607.2024.10497394
Querido, D. V. (2023). Effectiveness of Interactive Classroom Tool: A Quasi-Experiment in Assessing Students’ Engagement and Performance in Mathematics 10 using ClassPoint. Applied Quantitative Analysis, 3(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.31098/quant.1601
Rahman, S. T., & Rabiul Islam, M. (2022). Experimental Method. In Principles of Social Research Methodology (pp. 157–165). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5441-2_11
Ritonga, S. A., Sahbuki Ritonga, U. H. M. T., Ritonga, A. R., & Wahyu, A. (2023). The Effect of ClassPoint Learning Media as Interactive and Fun Learning. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 2(6), 2206–2212.
Rodríguez, J. L., Romero, I., & Codina, A. (2021). The influence of neotrie vr’s immersive virtual reality on the teaching and learning of geometry. Mathematics, 9(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9192411
Salas-Rueda, R. A. (2020). Design, construction and evaluation of a web application for the teaching-learning process on financial mathematics. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I08.12275
Sheharyar, A., Masad, E., & Srinivasa, A. (2020). Enhancing 3D spatial skills of engineering students using augmented reality. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2020-June. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85095776203&partnerID=40&md5=244e1090b1ecaa3b8bd9bb5a1313c8ce
Simelane-Mnisi, S., & Mji, A. (2019). Technology-engagement teaching strategy using personal response systems on student’s approaches to learning to increase the mathematics pass rate. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 18, 331–353. https://doi.org/10.28945/4393
Stehle, S. M., & Peters-Burton, E. E. (2019). Developing student 21st Century skills in selected exemplary inclusive STEM high schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0192-1
Suherman, S., Zafirah, A., Agusti, F. A., & Usman, R. (2020). The Effectiveness of AR-Geometry Interactive Book in Increasing Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Skill. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1554(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1554/1/012075
Sujatmiko, S., & Dyah.P., R. (2023). The Influence Of Classpoint-Based Interactive Media On Research Learning Outcomes In Elementary Schools. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.22-7-2023.2335418
Syahrul, N. (2021). Fun and Innovative Literature Learning. 1st International Conference Of Education, Social …, 581(Incesh).
Wulandari, S., Sa’dijah, C., As’ari, A. R., & Sulandra, I. M. (2019). Spatial representation on geometry. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(12), 27–30. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077053141&partnerID=40&md5=e2b84021a5930974721cf6c76c417711
Zajić, J. S. O., & Maksimović, J. Ž. (2022). Quasi-Experimental Research as An Epistemological-Methodological Approach in Education Research. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 10(3), 177–183. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-3-177-183
Ziatdinov, R., & Valles, J. R. (2022). Synthesis of Modeling, Visualization, and Programming in GeoGebra as an Effective Approach for Teaching and Learning STEM Topics. In Mathematics (Vol. 10, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030398
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um048v31i1p%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
| Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan |
Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
2.png)
1.png)
1.png)
1.png)
4.png)
.png)
1.png)
.png)
.png)


3.png)
1.png)
1.png)


