PERSEPSI MAHASISWA TERHADAP METODE UMPAN BALIK KOREKTIF KARANGAN DESKRIPSI MAHASISWA PADA MATA KULIAH SCHREIBEN AUF DEUTSCH
Abstract
This study aims to describe students’ perceptions of the implementation of corrective feedback methods, including indirect written corrective feedback from instructors, direct written corrective feedback from peers, and oral corrective feedback from instructors. The data sample consisted of 71 German Language Education students from A, B, and C classes of 2024 cohort who were enrolled in the course Schreiben Auf Deutsch. This study employed a descriptive qualitative method using a questionnaire as the research instrument. The results indicate that instructors provide corrective feedback in both written and oral forms. Students showed positive responses to corrective feedback, such as increased motivation, critical thinking skills, speaking and writing abilities, and an understanding of where errors occurred and how to correct them. Negative responses also emerged, such as feelings of nervousness, laziness, and a lack of self-confidence.
Keywords: Corrective feedback, descriptive essay, student perception, Schreiben Auf Deutsch
References
Abdel Latif, M. M. M., Alsahil, A., & Alsuhaibani, Z. (2024). Profiling EFL writing teachers’ feedback provision practices and activity uses in Saudi universities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1120. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03639-5
Anggreini, D. (2019). EFL Students’ Preferences Toward Oral Corrective Feedback In Speaking Across Personality Types. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Carless, D., & Winstone, N. (2023). Teacher feedback literacy and its interplay with student feedback literacy. Teaching in Higher Education, 28(1), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2020.1782372
Djawahir, A. H., Anam, C., & Mufarokhah, N. (2024). Metodologi Penelitian Dasar, Perlengkapan, Perangkat. Edulitera.
Ellis, R. (2009a). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023
Ellis, R. (2009b). Corrective Feedback and Teacher Development. L2 Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/L2.V1I1.9054
Farizka, N. (2021). Teachers’ and Students’ Perceptions on Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Graham, S. (2019). Changing How Writing Is Taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
Ha, X. V. (2023). High school EFL teachers’ oral corrective feedback beliefs and practices, and the effects of lesson focus. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 61(4), 1799–1826. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2021-0213
Indrastana, N. S. (2016). Written corrective feedback pratice and cognition of an exemplary EFL writing lecturer in state University of Malang. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Jiang, X., & Ironsi, S. S. (2024). Do learners learn from corrective peer feedback? Insights from students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 83, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101385
Karisma, D. (2019). English Teachers’ Perspektives, Practices, and Problems Regarding the Corrective Feedback in Students’ Writing. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Lee, J. (2018). Feedback on feedback: Guiding student interpreter performance. The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.110201.2018.a09
Mentari, J. (2016). Umpan balik dalam mata kuliah deutsch 3 Jurusan Sastra Jerman Universitas Malang. Negeri Malang.
Morissan. (2024). Riset Kualitatif. Kencana.
Mulyadi, S., Basuki, A. M. H., & Prabowo, H. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Mized Method: Perspektif yang Terbaru untuk Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Kemanusiaan dan Budaya. PT RajaGrafindo Persada.
Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article Interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 535–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816644940
Perend, Y. (2024). The Types of Written Corrective Feedback on Undergraduate Thesis Writing: Practice and Students’ Responses [Thesis]. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rinawati, A., Mirnawati, L. B., & Setiawan, F. (2020). Analisis Hubungan Keterampilan Membaca dengan Keterampilan Menulis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Education Journal : Journal Educational Research and Development, 4(2), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.31537/ej.v4i2.343
Sepehrinia, S., & Mehdizadeh, M. (2018). Oral corrective feedback: Teachers’ concerns and researchers’ orientation. The Language Learning Journal, 46(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2016.1172328
Septiana, A. R. (2014). Correvtive feedback on Writing accurary asrelated to students’ different levels of gramatical sensitivity. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Sheen, Y. (2011). Corrective Feedback, Individual Differences and Second Language Learning (Vol. 13). Springer Dordrecht.
Siagian, C. E. M., & Pinem, S. H. (2021). PERSEPSI MAHASISWA TERHADAP UMPAN BALIK KOREKTIF DOSEN PADA MATA KULIAH SPEAKING. Jurnal Darma Agung, 29(2), 287. https://doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v29i2.1087
Sitorus, H., Radni Defri Sagita, Rahmadarati Rahmadarati, & Ari Suriani. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan Keterampilan Menulis Karangan Deskripsi Peserta Didik Fase B di Sekolah Dasar. Morfologi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya, 2(3), 289–303. https://doi.org/10.61132/morfologi.v2i3.739
Windarsih, C. A. (2016). APLIKASI TEORI UMPAN BALIK (FEEDBACK) DALAM PEMBELAJARAN MOTORIK PADA ANAK USIA DINI. 2, 20–29.
Zahra, M., & Retnantiti, S. (2022). Peer Assessment in German Writing Essay for 11th Graders of Language Class SMA Islam Kepanjen Malang. Journal DaFIna - Journal Deutsch als Fremdsprache in Indonesien, 6(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.17977/um079v6i22022p75-86
Zamorano, D., Panadero, E., Alqassab, M., & Gómez-Varela, J. F. (2026). Provider versus recipient: Peer feedback roles effect on task performance, perceptions of learning, trust, and epistemic emotions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 88, 101560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101560
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um079v1i12026p%25p
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License .
11.png) |
11.png) |
42.png) |
1.png) |
eISSN 2548-1681