The Development of Problem-Solving Ability in Chemistry Proposition on the Topic of Stoichiometry by Using the 5E’s of Inquiry-Based Learning Combined with the FOPS Strategy for Grade 10 Students

Kamolsiri Sudchanham, Kanyarat Cojorn

Abstract


This classroom action research aimed to improve the chemistry problem-solving abilities of Grade 10 students using the 5E Inquiry-Based Learning model combined with the FOPS Strategy, with the goal of achieving a 70% success criterion. The target group consisted of 25 Grade 10 students from Sarakhampittayakhom School, Thailand. The research instruments included: (1) lesson plans incorporating the 5E Inquiry-Based Learning model and the FOPS Strategy, (2) a chemistry problem-solving ability test, (3) a behavioral observation checklist for assessing problem-solving abilities, and (4) student interviews. Quantitative data were analyzed using statistics such as mean, percentage, and standard deviation, while qualitative data were analyzed using content analysis. The results showed that in the first cycle, 10 students (40.00%) achieved the 70% criterion. In the second cycle, the number increased to 17 students (68.00%). By the third cycle, 23 students (92.00%) met the criterion, demonstrating significant improvement in problem-solving abilities.

Keywords


Chemistry Problem-Solving Ability, 5E Inquiry-Based Learning, FOPS Strategy

References


Artdej, R. (2010). Thai Grade 11 students’ alternative conceptions for acid–base chemistry. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(2): 167–183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635141003748382

Barman, & C.R. (1992). An Evaluation of the Use of a Technique Designed to Assist Prospective Elementary Teachers use the Learning Cycle Science Textbooks. School Science and Mathematics,92(February1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1992.tb12142.x

Baroody, A. J. (1993). Problem Solving, Reasoning, and Communicating, K-8 Helping Children Think Mathematically. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1808/1/012050

Charles, R., & Lester, F. K. (1982). Teaching problem solving what why & how. Palo Alto, Carifornia: Dale Semour Publications.

Dahsah, C. (2007). Thai Grade 10 and 11 Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Ability to Solve Stoichiometry Problems. Research in Science and Technological Education, 25(2), 227-241.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02635140701250808

Dalziel, K. H. , Grismer, L. , & Thompson, S. (2008). Teaching and Learning Research Exchange Exploring Cognitive Strategy Instruction (SCI), Schema-Based Instruction (SBI), and Strategic Content Learning (SCI) with Students with Learning and Developmental Disabilities in Higher-Order Mathematics: Two

Devine T.G. (1986). Teaching reading comprehension from theory to practice. Newton : Allyn and Bacon

Gilbert, J. K. (2006). On the nature of context in chemical education. International Journal of Science Education, 28: 957–976.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702470

Gokhan, D., & Gulsen, C. (2014). The effect of laboratory activities based on 5e model of constructivist approach on 9th grade students' understanding of constructivist approach on 9th grade students' understanding of solution chemistry. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3120-3124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.719

Han, K., and Kim, Y. (2016). The effect of Polya’s heurictics in mathematical problem solving of mild disability students. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 32(2): 253– 289.

http://dx.doi.org/10.7858/eamj.2016.020

Hargen, P. (2000, November). Cooperative learning in organic ii. increased retention on a computer campus Journal of Chemical Education, 11, 1441-1444.http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed077p1441

Herganhahn, B.R. and Olson, M. (1993). An introduction to theories of learning 4th ed. United States: Prentice Hall.

Ijirana, I., Aminah , S., Supriadi, S., & Poba, D. (2021). The Ability of Chemistry Problem Solving of Senior High School Students in Palu Sulawesi Tengah. Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 10(2), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.22487/j24775185.2021.v10.i2.pp64-71

Jitendra, A. K. , & Hoff, K. (1996). The Effects of Schema-Based Instruction on the Mathematical Word- Problem-solving Performance of Students with Learning Disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29 (4), 422-443. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900410

Jitendra, A. K. , & et al. (2010). Schema-Based Instruction: Facilitating Mathematical Word Problem Solving for Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. Preventing School Failure, 54 (3), 145–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10459880903493104

Jitendra, A. K. , & Star. J. R. (2011). Meeting the Needs of Students With Learning Disabilities in Inclusive Mathematics Classrooms: The Role of Schema - Based Instruction on Mathematical Problem Solving. Theory into Practice, 50 (1), 12 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2011.534912

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Geelong: Deakin university.

Krulik, S. and Jesse A. Rudnick.(1996). The New Sourcebook for Teaching Reasoning and Problem Solving in Junior and Senior High School. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.

Le Thi Dang Chi, Tran Trung Ninh. (2018). Assessment of Problem Solving Ability and Creativity in Chemistry Teaching at Secondary Schools in Binh Dinh, Vietnam. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(6), 757-762. http://dx.doi.org/10.12691/education-6-6-26

Marshall, S. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York : Cambridge University

Na,K. E. (2009) .The Effect of Schema – Based Intervention on the Mathematical Word Problem Solving Skills of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities The University of Texas at Austin.

Reys, R. E., Suydam, M. N., & Lindquist, M. M. (1995). Helping children learn mathematics (4th ed). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Rockwell, Sarah B. (2012). Teaching students with autism to solve addtive word problems using schema-based strategy instruction. Ed.D.

Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). “The building blocks of cognition” In Guthrie. J , ed. Comprehension and reading research reviews. p. 5. NJ :Lawrence rence

Skinner, B.F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts

Skripsi, B. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Model Schema-Based Instruction (SBI) Dengan Strategi FOPS Pada Materi Kaidah Pencacahan.uinjkt.ac.id

Smith, K.J. (1991). Problem Solving. California : Book/Cole.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um048v31i1p%25p

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
ISSN: 0215-9643 | E-ISSN: 2442-8655
Contact
Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Negeri Malang (UM)
Graha Rektorat, Floor 6, Jl. Semarang No 5 Malang 65145
Homepage: http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jip
E-mail: jip@um.ac.id

Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats