The role of adversity quotient (AQ) for successful mathematics learning

Siti Salamah Br Ginting

Abstract


This study aims to explore the role of adversity quotient (AQ) in the success of mathematics learning. AQ refers to an individual's ability to survive and overcome difficulties in learning, which is particularly relevant in the context of mathematics which is often considered a challenging subject. This article examines the history and development of the concept of AQ, how it differs from other intelligences such as IQ and EQ, as well as AQ development strategies to improve achievement in mathematics. This study uses a literature review method by analyzing academic literature in the last 10-15 years. Challenges include the complexity of mathematical concepts, misunderstandings, anxiety, lack of motivation, diverse learning styles, a less supportive learning environment, and different starting abilities. AQ, which refers to a person's ability to persevere in the face of adversity, plays a crucial role in helping students overcome these challenges. This research discusses the history and development of the concept of AQ, its dimensions, its differences with other intelligences such as IQ and EQ, and its important role in overcoming the challenges of mathematics learning. The results of the study show that AQ contributes significantly to improving students' motivation, learning resilience, and problem-solving skills in mathematics. This study provides recommendations for educators in creating a supportive learning environment as well as strategies to improve students' AQ.

Keywords


adversity quotient, mathematics learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cai, Jinfa, Anne Morris, Stephen Hwang, Charles Hohensee, Victoria Robison, and James Hiebert. 2017. ‘Improving the Impact of Educational Research’. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 48(1):2–6. doi: 10.5951/jresematheduc.48.1.0002.

Cando, Jean Marie D., and Luni N. Villacastin. 2014. ‘The Relationship Between Adversity Quotient (AQ) and Emotional Quotient (EQ) and Teaching Performance of College PE Faculty Members of CIT University’. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR) 18(2):354–67.

Canivel, Lea Daradal. 2010. ‘Principals’ Adversity Quotient: Styles, Performance and Practices’. University of the Philippines, Quezon City.

Dan, Nguyen Ngoc, Le Thai Bao Thien Trung, Nguyen Thi Nga, and Tang Minh Dung. 2024. ‘Digital Game-Based Learning in Mathematics Education at Primary School Level: A Systematic Literature Review’. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 20(4):em2423. doi: 10.29333/ejmste/14377.

English, Lyn D., and Donna King. 2019. ‘STEM Integration in Sixth Grade: Desligning and Constructing Paper Bridges’. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 17(5):863–84. doi: 10.1007/s10763-018-9912-0.

Foley, Alana E., Julianne B. Herts, Francesca Borgonovi, Sonia Guerriero, Susan C. Levine, and Sian L. Beilock. 2017. ‘The Math Anxiety-Performance Link: A Global Phenomenon’. Current Directions in Psychological Science 26(1):52–58.

Goleman, Daniel. 2020. Emotional Intelligence. 25th anniversary edition. New York: Bantam Books.

Graven, Mellony, and Einat Heyd-Metzuyanim. 2019. ‘Mathematics Identity Research: The State of the Art and Future Directions: Review and Introduction to ZDM Special Issue on Identity in Mathematics Education’. ZDM 51(3):361–77. doi: 10.1007/s11858-019-01050-y.

Hanifa, Shofia, Muhammad Afrilianto, and Risma Amelia. 2024. ‘The Effect of Problem Based Learning Model on Junior High School Students’ Problem Solving Ability’. (JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING 7(2):136–44. doi: 10.22460/jiml.v7i2.19639.

Hastuti, T. D., D. R. Sari S, and Riyadi. 2018. ‘Student Profile with High Adversity Quotient in Math Learning’. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 983:012131. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012131.

Hema, G., and S. M. Gupta. 2015. ‘Adversity Quotient for Prospective Higher Education’. International Journal of Indian Psychology 2(3). doi: 10.25215/0203.080.

Hidayat, Wahyu. 2017. ‘Adversity Quotient dan Penalaran Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMA dalam Pembelajaran Argument Driven Inquiry pada Materi Turunan Fungsi’. Kalamatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 2(1):15–28. doi: 10.22236/KALAMATIKA.vol2no1.2017pp15-28.

Huijuan, Zhou. 2009. ‘The Adversity Quotient and Academic Performance Among College Students at St. Joseph’s College, Quezon City’. St. Joseph’s College Quezon City.

Jiang, Ronghuan, Ru‐de Liu, Jon Star, Rui Zhen, Jia Wang, Wei Hong, Shuyang Jiang, Yan Sun, and Xinchen Fu. 2021. ‘How Mathematics Anxiety Affects Students’ Inflexible Perseverance in Mathematics Problem‐solving: Examining the Mediating Role of Cognitive Reflection’. British Journal of Educational Psychology 91(1):237–60. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12364.

Juwita, Hesti Ratna, Roemintoyo Roemintoyo, and Budi Usodo. 2020. ‘The Role of Adversity Quotient in the Field of Education: A Review of the Literature on Educational Development’. International Journal of Educational Methodology 6(3):507–15. doi: 10.12973/ijem.6.3.507.

Kurniawati, Ike, Tri Joko Raharjo, and Khumaedi Khumaedi. 2021. ‘Mathematical Problem Solving Ability on Problem Based Learning Assisted by GeoGebra in Primary School’.

Matore, Mohd Effendi Ewan Mohd, Ahmad Zamri Khairani, and Nordin Abd Razak. 2015. ‘The Influence of AQ on the Academic Achievement among Malaysian Polytechnic Students’. International Education Studies 8(6):p69. doi: 10.5539/ies.v8n6p69.

Mayer, J. D., P. Salovey, and D. R. Caruso. 2017. ‘Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT) User’s Manual’. Association for Psychological Science 26(1):52–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416672463.

Morgan, Paul L., George Farkas, Marianne M. Hillemeier, Wik Hung Pun, and Steve Maczuga. 2019. ‘Kindergarten Children’s Executive Functions Predict Their Second Grade Academic Achievement and Behavior’. Child Development 90(5):1802–16. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13095.

Neisser, Ulric, Gwyneth Boodoo, Thomas J. Bouchard, A. Wade Boykin, Nathan Brody, Stephen J. Ceci, Diane F. Halpern, John C. Loehlin, Robert Perloff, Robert J. Sternberg, and Susana Urbina. 1996. ‘Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns.’ American Psychologist 51(2):77–101. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.77.

Nikam, Vibhawari B., and Megha M. Uplane. 2013. ‘Adversity Quotient and Defense Mechanism of Secondary School Students’. Universal Journal of Educational Research.

Özcan, Zeynep Çiğdem, and Aynur Eren Gümüş. 2019. ‘A Modeling Study to Explain Mathematical Problem-Solving Performance through Metacognition, Self-Efficacy, Motivation, and Anxiety’. Australian Journal of Education 63(1):116–34. doi: 10.1177/0004944119840073.

Parvathy, Usha, and M. Praseeda. 2014. ‘Relationship between Adversity Quotient and Academic Problems among Student Teachers’. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 19(11):23–26. doi: 10.9790/0837-191172326.

Peng, Peng, Tengfei Wang, CuiCui Wang, and Xin Lin. 2019. ‘A Meta-Analysis on the Relation between Fluid Intelligence and Reading/Mathematics: Effects of Tasks, Age, and Social Economics Status.’ Psychological Bulletin 145(2):189–236. doi: 10.1037/bul0000182.

Pizzie, Rachel G., Nikita Raman, and David J. M. Kraemer. 2020. ‘Math Anxiety and Executive Function: Neural Influences of Task Switching on Arithmetic Processing’. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 20(2):309–25. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00770-z.

Primi, Ricardo, Gleiber Couto, Leandro S. Almeida, M. Adelina Guisande, and Fabiano Koich Miguel. 2012. ‘Intelligence, Age and Schooling: Data from the Battery of Reasoning Tests (BRT-5)’. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica 25(1):79–88. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722012000100010.

Ramirez, Gerardo, Stacy T. Shaw, and Erin A. Maloney. 2018. ‘Math Anxiety: Past Research, Promising Interventions, and a New Interpretation Framework’. Educational Psychologist 53(3):145–64. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1447384.

Rittle-Johnson, B., M. Schneider, and J. R. Star. 2015. ‘Not a One-Way Street: Bidirectional Relations Between Procedural and Conceptual Knowledge of Mathematics’. Educational Psychology Review (4):587–97. doi: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10648-015-9302-x.

Safi’i, Asrop, Imron Muttaqin, Sukino, Nur Hamzah, Chusnul Chotimah, Imam Junaris, and Muh. Khoirul Rifa’i. 2021. ‘The Effect of the Adversity Quotient on Student Performance, Student Learning Autonomy and Student Achievement in the COVID-19 Pandemic Era: Evidence from Indonesia’. Heliyon 7(12):e08510. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510.

Schmidt, Frank L., and John E. Hunter. 1998. ‘The Validity and Utility of Selection Methods in Personnel Psychology: Practical and Theoretical Implications of 85 Years of Research Findings.’ Psychological Bulletin 124(2):262–74. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262.

Sediarin, Cloyde D., Katherine B. Parangat, and Joemark D. Ablian. 2023. ‘Learner’s Beliefs and Values in Learning Mathematics in the New Normal’. 7(6).

Stillman, Gloria Ann, and Jill P. Brown, eds. 2019. Lines of Inquiry in Mathematical Modelling Research in Education. Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Stoltz, Paul, G. 1997. Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.

Stoltz, Paul, G. 2000. Adversity Quotient at Work: Make Everyday Challenges the Key to Your Success. HarperCollins.

Sulastry, Heny, Edi Harapan, and Andi Rahman. 2023. ‘The Influence of Leadership Effectiveness, Adversity Quotient, and Organizational Culture on Teacher’s Performance’. Journal of Social Work and Science Education 4(1):167–75.

Tiwari, Shivkant, Dragan Obradovic, Laxmi Rathour, Lakshmi Narayan Mishra, and Vishnu Narayan Mishra. 2021. ‘Visualization In Mathematics Teaching’. JOURNAL OF ADVANCES IN MATHEMATICS 20:431–39. doi: 10.24297/jam.v20i.9136.

Venkatesh, J., and G. Shivaranjani. 2016. ‘Adversity Quotient Profile-A Robust Assessment Tool to Measure Human Resilience’. Asian Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities 6(6):412–26. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2249-7315.2016.00435.4.

Vosniadou, Stella. 2019. ‘The Development of Students’ Understanding of Science’. Frontiers in Education 4:32. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2019.00032.

Wechsler, D. 1944. The Measurement of Adult Intelligence (3rd Ed.). Williams & Wilkins.

Yazon, Alberto D., and Karen Ang- Manaig. 2020. ‘Adversity Quotient®, Emotional Quotient and Academic Performance of Filipino Student-Parents’. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences 6(2):153–63. doi: 10.20319/pijss.2020.62.153163.

Zhang, Jing, Nan Zhao, and Qi Ping Kong. 2019. ‘The Relationship Between Math Anxiety and Math Performance: A Meta-Analytic Investigation’. Frontiers in Psychology 10:1613. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01613.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um047v31i22024p91-104

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Salamah Br Ginting

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

INDEXED BY

TOOLS PLAGIARISM CHECK ARTICLE TEMPLATE

 

 

Research Article

Non Research Article

Creative Commons License

JPP (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License

JPP Statistics (Since July 14th, 2020): View My Stats

slot gacor

slot gacor

slot gacor

situs toto
situs toto

SLOT ONLINE

https://imbtangerang.com/

https://warta-gereja.com/

ajo89

situs toto

omtogel

situs togel

situs toto

sulebet

https://pancawarna.desa.id/pan/

oja89

slot

situs toto

situs toto

slot88 slot cod178

rumpitoto

karirtoto

slot gacor

karirtoto

mcdbola

nusa89

bonus new member

slot deposit 5000

Scatter Slot

Demo Slot

luxury89

situs slot gacor terbaru gampang menang malam ini

slot thailand

slot thailand