Effectiveness of Genetic Module to Reduce Misconception Levels and Improve Cognitive Learning Outcomes of Grade XII Students of SMA Negeri 5 Malang

Didik Dwi Prastyo, Mohamad Amin, Hendra Susanto

Abstract


We investigate the effectiveness of module to reduce misconception and improve learning outcomes in genetic material using multiple choice test with CRI. This study using pre-experiment study with one group pretest post test design. This study reports the results of analysis of misconception level of XII grades in SMA Negeri 5 Malang reduce from 33.42 percent to 12.92 percent. Learning outcome increase from 38.30 into 72.96.  These results indicate that the genetic module is effective to reducing the level of misconceptions and improving student cognitive learning outcomes.

Keywords: Misconception, learning outcomes, genetic


Full Text:

PDF

References


Laksana DNL. Miskonsepsi Dalam Materi Ipa Sekolah Dasar. JPI (Jurnal Pendidik Indones. 2016;5(2):166.

Barrass R. Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. J Biol Educ. 1984;18(3):201–6.

Liliawati W, Ramalis TR. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Materi IPBA di SMA Dengan Menggunakan CRI (Certainly of Respons Index) Dalam Upaya Perbaikan Urutan Pemberian Materi IPBA Pada KTSP. Pros Semin Nas Penelitian, Pendidikan, dan Penerapan MIPA. 2009;159–68.

Tanziah, Lia Li’anatus; Rachamdiarti, Fida; Prastiwi MS. BioEdu BioEdu. 2016;5(3):189–93.

Yip D-Y (Departement of curriculum and instruction TCU of HK. Identification of misconceptions in novice biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. Int J Sci Educ. 1998;20(4):37–41.

Goff EE, Reindl KM, Johnson C, McClean P, Offerdahl EG, Schroeder NL, et al. Efficacy of a Meiosis Learning Module Developed for the Virtual Cell Animation Collection. Allen D, editor. CBE—Life Sci Educ. 2017 Mar;16(1):ar9.

Hong Kwen B. Teachers ’ Misconceptions of Biological Science Concepts as Revealed in Science Examination Papers. Int Educ Res Conf. 2005;(December):1–8.

Venville, E. J. And Treagust DF. venville dan Treagust. Aust Sci Teach J. 2002;48(2):20–4.

Sarhim FP, Harahap F. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Genetika Di Kelas XII IPA SMA Negeri 13 Medan Tahun Pembelajaran 2014 / 2015. J Pelita Pendidik. 2015;3(4):162–70.

Murni D. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Pada Konsep Substansi Genetika Menggunakan Certainty of Response Index (CRI). Pros Semirata FMIPA Univ Lampung. 2013;1(1):205–12.

Chaniariosi LF. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Guru Biologi Sma Kelas Xi Ipa Pada Konsep Sistem Reproduksi Manusia. J EduBio Trop. 2015;2(2):187–91.

Weaver G, Russell C, Wink D. Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science. Nat Chem Biol 4. 2008;(577–580).

Reece JB, Urry LA, Cain ML, Wasserman SA, Minorsky P V., Jackson RB. Campbell Biology. Campbell Biology. 2010.

Russel P j. i Genetic Mollecular Approach. 3Th ed. Vol. 53. New York: Benjamin Cummings; 2019. 1689–1699 p.

Longfield J. Discrepant Teaching Events: Using an Inquiry Stance to Address Students’ Misconceptions. Int J Teach Learn High Educ [Internet]. 2009;21(2):266–71. Available from: http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/

Hasanah N, Hidayat A, H SK. Pengaruh Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif melalui Model Pembelajaran Guided Inquiry untuk Mengurangi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Gelombang Mekanik. Pros Semin Pend IPA Pascasarj UM. 2017;2:239–46.

Zulia Witanecahya S, Jatmiko B. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing (Guided Inquiry) untuk Mengurangi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X SMAN 2 Ponorogo pada Pokok Bahasan Perpindahan Panas. J Inov Pendidik Fis. 2014;03(03):6–10.

Zuhri MS, Jatmiko B, Fisika J, Surabaya UN, Simulation P. Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri (Inquiry Learning) Menggunakan Phet Simulation Untuk Menurunkan Miskonsepsi Siswa XI Pada Materi Fluida Statis Di SMAN Kesamben Jombang. J Inov Pendidik Fis. 2014;03(03):103–7.

Grospietsch F, Mayer J. Professionalizing pre-service biology teachers’ misconceptions about learning and the brain through conceptual change. Educ Sci. 2018;8(3):1–23.

Wenno IH, Esomar K, Sopacua V. Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Dan Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri. J Cakrawala Pendidik. 2016;35(3):378–85.

Barrow LH. A brief history of inquiry: From dewey to standards. J Sci Teacher Educ. 2006;17(3):265–78.

Bunterm T, Lee K, Ng Lan Kong J, Srikoon S, Vangpoomyai P, Rattanavongsa J, et al. Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning Outcomes? A comparison between guided and structured inquiry. Int J Sci Educ [Internet]. 2014;36(12):1937–59. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.886347

Fitriani NR, Widiyatmoko A, Khusniati M. The effectiveness of CTL model guided inquiri-based in the topic of chemicals in daily life to improve students’ learning outcomes and activeness. J Pendidik IPA Indones. 2016;5(2):278–83.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um072v2i22021p89-97

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.