Relation of Learning Compass 2030 and Management Regulation of Merdeka Curriculum for School and Higher Education in Indonesia

Zonalia Fitriza, Dinn Wahyudin, Laksmi Dewi

Abstract


Technological developments and global competition are challenges in this digital era that require Indonesia’s young generation preparing themselves to compete in this disruptive era. The Merdeka Curriculum (Freedom to Learn) at Schools and the Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) Curriculum (Freedom to Learn) at Universities in Indonesia are implemented to prepare students to have future competencies consisting of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values which are called as the 2030 Learning Compass. This study aims to describe the relationship between the Management policies of Merdeka and the MBKM curriculum with Learning Compass 2030. Eight policy documents related to the management of the aforementioned curriculum were analyzed through the document analysis method with an interpretive approach to reveal how the latest curriculum management policies can achieve the goals of Learning Compass 2030. The results obtained are regulations issued by the Indonesian government regarding curriculum management possibly achieving competencies consisting of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values if planning, implementing, evaluating, and controlling are in ideal condition.


Keywords


curriculum management; Merdeka curriculum; MBKM; Learning Compass 2030

Full Text:

PDF

References


N. Kholis, “Islamic Universities Facing Disruptive Era: Implication for Management Change,” 2020, doi: 10.4108/eai.1-10-2019.2291688.

OECD, “Learning Compass 2030,” p. 12, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.oecd.org/education/2030-project

D. Wahyudin, “School Principal as Curriculum Manager : An Approach to The Improvement of Primary School Teacher Performance in Indonesia,” vol. IV, no. 1, pp. 29–34, 2010.

A. Rozak, “Kebijakan Pendidikan Di Indonesia,” vol. 3, no. 25, pp. 197–208, 2021.

P. R. Indonesia, Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003.

P. R. Indonesia, Standar Nasional Pendidikan. 2021.

R. dan T. Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Salinan Keputusan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 56/M/2022 tentang Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran. 2022.

Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Nomor, “Lampiran Ii Keputusan Kepala Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Nomor 028/H/Ku/2021 Tentang Capaian Pembelajaran PAUD, SD, SMP, SMA, SDLB, SMPLB, SMALB Pada Program Sekolah Penggerak.” Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Nomor, Jakarta, p. 6, 2021.

P. R. Indonesia, Pendidikan Tinggi. 2012.

M. Pendidikan, D. A. N. Kebudayaan, and R. Indonesia, Salinan Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi. 2020.

D. J. P. dan K. K. R. T. Dikti, Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2020.

P. R. Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia. 2012.

D. Jendral, K. Riset, and P. Tinggi, Lampiran PP Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 tentang Alur Perpindahan Antar Jenis Pendidikan Dokumen 006. 2015, pp. 1–3.

B. J. Caldwell, School-based management. Franch and Belgium: UNESCO, 2005.

E. Muslihah, “School Based Management : Concept Development and its Implementation in Indonesia,” Alqalam, vol. 26, no. No.3, pp. 427–448, 2009.

H. Tsoupikova, M. Tsyguleva, and M. Fedorova, “Developing students’ cognitive and communicative skills when learning foreign languages,” SHS Web Conf., vol. 69, p. 00037, 2019, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/20196900037.

Adnan and A. Bahri, “Beyond effective teaching: Enhancing students’ metacognitive skill through guided inquiry,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 954, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/954/1/012022.

A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 177AD, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-75361-4.

I. Abrahams and M. J. Reiss, “Assessment of practical skills,” Sch. Sci. Rev., vol. 96, no. 357, pp. 40–44, 2015.

A. A. Lijadi, “What are universally accepted human values that define ‘a good life’? Historical perspective of value theory,” no. August, pp. 1–30, 2019, [Online]. Available: www.iiasa.ac.at

N. A. Jones, S. Shaw, H. Ross, K. Witt, and B. Pinner, “The study of human values in understanding and managing social-ecological systems,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 21, no. 1, 2016, doi: 10.5751/ES-07977-210115.

K.Rethidevi, “Impact of personal values,” IJARIIE, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 5, 2016.

Bektas & Nalcaci and (Ankara University), “The relationship between personal values and attitude towards teaching profession,” Kuram ve Uygulamada Egit. Bilim., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1244–1248, 2012.

K. A. A. Gamage, D. M. S. C. P. K. Dehideniya, and S. Y. Ekanayake, “The role of personal values in learning approaches and student achievements,” Behav. Sci. (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/bs11070102.

I. Chaston, “Societal Values and Expectations,” Public Sect. Reform., no. 6, pp. 22–43, 2012, doi: 10.1057/9780230379350_2.

M. Türkkahraman, “Social Values and Value Education,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 116, pp. 633–638, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.270.

A. Dewangan, “Human Values and its impact on society,” SSRN Electron. J., 2021, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3868738.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um072v4i22023p93-106

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


PUIPT Disruptive Learning Innovation Universitas Negeri Malang (PUIPT DLI UM)
Gedung B15 Lantai 1, Universitas Negeri Malang
Jl. Semarang No.5, Kota Malang
Jawa Timur, Indonesia.
Handphone: +6281333886762
Email: jodli@um.ac.id
http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jodli

  

Lisensi Creative Commons
Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI) by PUIPT DLI UM is licensed under a Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.

JODLI Indexed By:

 

Accreditation Certificate

Based on the Official Letter from the Director General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology No 204/E/KPT/2022, dated October 3, 2022, Journal of Disruptive Learning Innovation (JODLI) is granted RANK 3 JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC ACCREDITATION PERIOD II YEAR 2022. This rating status is valid for 5 (five) years from Vol 1, No 2, 2020 up to Vol 6, No 1, 2025.