Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran dan Bakat Mekanik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Praktik Teknik Otomotif Di SMK

Suyanto Suyanto, Nyoman Sudana Degeng, Punaji Setyosari, Waras Kamdi

Abstract


Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menguji signifikansi perbedaan hasil belajar pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan psikomotorik antara siswa dengan strategi pembelajaran kontekstual dan strategi pembelajaran langsung, perbedaan hasil belajar pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan psikomotorik antara siswa yang bakat mekanik tinggi dan bakat mekanik rendah, interaksi strategi pembelajaran dan bakat mekanik dalam perolehan hasil belajar pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan psikomotorik. Penelitian ini menggunakan rancangan Faktorial 2 x 2. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa strategi pembelajaran kontekstual lebih unggul dibanding strategi pembelajaran langsung, siswa berbakat mekanik tinggi lebih unggul dibanding siswa berbakat mekanik rendah, tidak ada interaksi yang signifikan antara strategi pembelajaran dan bakat mekanik pada hasil belajar pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan psikomotorik.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the significance of differences in learning outcomes in understanding psychomotor concepts and skills between students and contextual learning strategies and direct learning strategies, differences in learning outcomes in understanding concepts and psychomotor skills between students with high mechanical talent and low mechanical talent, interaction learning strategies and mechanical talent in the acquisition of learning outcomes understanding concepts and psychomotor skills. This study uses a Factorial 2 x 2 design. The results of this study indicate that contextual learning strategies are superior to direct learning strategies, high mechanical gifted students are superior to low mechanical gifted students, there is no significant interaction between learning strategies and mechanical talent in learning outcomes understanding of concepts and psychomotor skills.


Keywords


pembelajaran kontekstual; pembelajaran langsung; bakat mekanik; hasil belajar; contextual learning; direct learning; mechanical talent; learning outcomes

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aer, I. & Anikpa, P.O. 2013. Contextual Teaching and Learning: A Strategy for Developing Grain Full Skills Through Science and Technology Education. Department of Integrated Science and Department of Physics, Federal Collegeof Education. Obudu, Cross River State. (Online). (www.globalacademicgroup.com/journals. Diakses, 20 Maret 2015).

Amir, 2007. Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontektual dan Kecakapan Motorik terhadap Perolehan Hasil Belajar Kerajinan Tangan dan Kesenian Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPS Universitas Negeri Malang.

Corebima, D.T. 2001. Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Jakarta: Direktorat Sekolah Lanjutan Pertama. Dikdasmen Depdiknas.

Danielson, J.A., Bander, H.S., Milss, E.M., Vwermeer, P.J & Lockee, B.B. 2003. A Tool for Helping Veterinary Lear Diagnostic Problem Solving. Education Technology Research and Development, 51(3): 6381.

Ghozali, I. 2008. Design Eksperimental, Teori, Konsep dan Analisis Data dengan SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbitan Universitas Diponegoro.

Johnson, E.B. 2002. Contextual Teaching and Learning. California: Cowin Press Inc.

Joyce, B. & Weil, M. 2004. Models of Teaching. 7th ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Kauchak, D.P. & Eggan, P.D. 1993. Learning and Teaching: Research Based Methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Kerlinger, F.N. & Lee, H.B. 2000. Foundations of Behavioral Research. (4th Edition). Orlando: Hacourt College Publisher.

Kevin, W., Wilson, E., Farin, C.E. & Bunga, J.L. 2012. Scientific Basis vs. Contextualized Teaching and Learning: The Effect on the Achievement of Postsecondary Students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(1): 57–66 DOI: 10.5032/jae.2012.01057. Diakses: 19 Maret 2015.

Khalid K. & Azeem M. 2012. Constructivist Vs Traditional: Effective Instructional Approach in Teacher Education. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_2_No_5_March_2012/21.pdf. Diakses 1 September 2015.

Mukhadis A. 1993. Pengaruh Pengorganisasian Isi Prosedural, Locus of Control dan Bakat Berfikir Mekanik terhadap Hasil dan Transper Belajar di Sekolah Teknologi Menengah Kodya Malang. Desertasi tidak diterbitkan. Malang: PPS IKIP Malang.

Munandar, U. 1995. Kreativitas dan Keberbakatan: Strategi Mewujudkan Potensi Kreatif dan Bakat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka.

Raharso, S. 2007. Implementasi Problem Based Learning di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 34(1): 5561.

Runco, M.A. & Albert, R.S. 1987. The Threshold Hypothesis Regarding Creativity and Intelegence: And Empirical Test With Gifted and Nongifted Children. Creat. Child Adult Q Journals, 11 (3): 212–218.

Smith, P. 2010. Implementing the Contextual Teaching and Learning Pedagogical Model. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences Education, http://www.natefacs.org/Pages/v28no1/v28no1Smith.pdf. 28 (1): 2336, diakses 4 Pebruari 2015.

Stevenson. J. 2003. Developing Vocational Expertise. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

Warpala, W.S. 2006. Pengaruh Pendekatan Pembelajaran dan Strategi Belajar Kooperatif terhadap Pemahaman dan Keterampilan Berfikir Kritis Siswa Kelas V SD di Kecamatan Kubutambahan. Disertasi tidak diterbitkan Malang: PPS Universitas Negeri Malang




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um031v3i12016p090

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Suyanto Suyanto, Nyoman Sudana Degeng, Punaji Setyosari, Waras Kamdi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

=====================================================================

JINOTEP Indexed by:

      

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

TOOLS:

   

_________________________________________________________________________________________

ARTICLE TEMPLATE:

 _______________________________________________________________________________________________________

MEDIA PARTNER:

      

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

CONFERENCE PARTNER:

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

JINOTEP (Jurnal Inovasi dan Teknologi Pembelajaran): Kajian dan Riset Dalam Teknologi Pembelajaran published by Department of Educational Technology, Faculty of Education, State University of Malang in collaboration with Indonesian Educational Technology Study Program Association (APS TPI).

Publisher Address:

Jl. Semarang No.5 Gedung E2 301
Laboratorium Teknologi Pendidikan, FIP UM

Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Telepon: 0341-551334, Pst. 109
E-mail: ensu@gapp.nthu.edu.tw (CP: 087821191948)

________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Jinotep Statistics (Since July 13th, 2020)

View My Stats