Orientation to Mobility, Socialization, and Communication Android Apps to Help Visually Impaired Students Understand the State University of Surabaya (UNESA) Campus Environment

Sri Joeda Andajani, Endang Pudjiastuti Sartinah, Meini Sondang Sumbawati

Abstract


UNESA is a national leader in education development. This is consistent with UNESA’s vision of achieving educational excellence. This realization is consistent with UNESA’s primary competency and capacity as a disabled-friendly campus, with one visually-impaired student. The goal of this research is to describe the outcomes of creating an Android application with a social mobility and communication focus to help students with visual impairments understand the UNESA campus environment. The product of this development research takes the form of an android application with a focus on social mobility and communication. Realization of product design, namely: 1) android application program packaged in mobile phones, 2) practical guide to access the outdoor environment on the way to various places in the UNESA Lidah Wetan and Ketintang campus environment with braille writing and writing alert, 2) cooperative form of think pair share type, 3) authentic assessment tool as a successful use of android applications in social orientation and communication mobility. The products created will be used by all visually impaired students who wish to visit the UNESA campuses in Lidah Wetan and Ketintang. UNESA’s inclusive campus is a place for all disabled people who want to continue their education, including the visually impaired who require environmental mobility facilities.

Keywords


orientation of social mobility and communication, android application, problem-based learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aldridge, J; Goldman, R. 2002. Current Issues and Trends in Education. Boston : A. Pearson Education Company.

Alja'am, J. M., El-Seoud, S. A. & Mwinyi, M. U. (2017). Design and implementation of a multimedia based technology solution to assist children with intellectual disability to learn. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, IJET, 12(4). doi:10.3991/ijet.v12i04.6698.

Andajani, Sri Joeda, and Asri Wijiastuti. (2020). E-Learning Development for Special Education Postgraduate Students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) 15(14): https://doi.org/269. 10.3991/ijet.v15i14.13893.

Andajani, Sri Joeda. Et al. (2018). Development of Social Mobility¬Orientation Models and Problem Based Learning-Based Communication for Understanding Environmental Concepts in visually impaired Students. LP2M Unesa, Research Results.

Ardhi Widjaya. (2013). ATN ins and outs. Yogyakarta: Java Litera.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2010. Research Procedures A Practical Approach. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

B. Jatmiko, B.K. Prahani, Munasir, P. Pandiangan, I. Wicaksono, N. Erlina, R. Althaf, & Zainuddin, “The comparison of oripa teaching model and problem-based learning model effectiveness to improve critical thinking skills of pre-service physics teachers”, Journal of Baltic Science Education, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 300-319, 2018.

Cole, P.& Lorna, Chan. (1990). Methods and Strategies for Special Education. Sydney : Prentice Hall Ltd.

Depdiknas. (2014). Specialty Development Program. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Effendi (2009). “Definition of Concept Understanding”. http://www.usershare.net.accessed tanggal 18 Oktober 2014.

Friend, M. (2005). “Special Education, Contemporary Perspectives for School Professionals”.United States of America: Pearson Education Inc.

G. Pretto and G. Curró, (2017). “An approach for doctoral students conducting context-specific review of literature in IT, ICT, and educational technology,” New Rev.Acad. Librariansh., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 60–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2016.1227861.

Gall, Borg, W.R. and Gall, M.D. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction. London: Longman, Inc.

Hasrulbakri. (2010). Interactive Multimedia Learning Steps. MEDTEKJurnal. Accessed 18 Oktober 2014.

Heinich,Molenda.Russel.1999. Instuctional Media And The New TechnologiesOf

Hosni, Irham. (1996). Orientation dan Mobility. Jakarta: Dikti.

Husamah, 2013. Outdoor Learning Strategic Design Develops Fun, Innovative and Challenging Learning Methods. Pustakaraya Achievement Publisher, Jakarta Indonesia.

Husamah, 2014. Blended Learning. Skilled in Combining the Advantages of Face To Face Learning, Offline-Online E-Learning and Mobile Learning. Published by Prestasi Pustakaraya, Jakarta Indonesia.

Instruction. Printed in the United State Of America.

J. E. Prescott, K. Bundschuh, E. R. Kazakoff, and P. Macaruso, (2018). “Elementary school–wide implementation of a blended learning program for reading intervention,” J. Educ. Res., vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1302914.

J. Ismaili, (2017). “Mobile learning as alternative to assistive technology devices for special needs students”. Education and Information Technologies, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 883-899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9462-9.

Jackson, Richard M. (2012). Audio-Supported Reading for Student Who are Blind or Visually Impaired. Wakefield, MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.

K. Abdillahi Barreh and Z. Wati Abas, (2015). “A framework for mobile leanring for enhancing learnign in higher education,” Malaysian Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–9.

Kemendikbud. (2014). Specialty Development Program: Guidelines for Development of Mobility, Social and Communication Orientations for visually impaired Students. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Kingsley, Mary. (1999). The Effect of Visual Loss, dalam Visual Impairment. (editor: Mason & McCall). GBR: David Fulton, Publisher.

Lahav, O and Mioduser, D. (2002). Multisensory virtual environment for supporting blind persons’ acquisition of spatial cognitive mapping, orientation, and mobility skills. Hungary: Intl Conf. Disability, Virtual Reality & Assoc. Tech., Veszprém. diakses pada tanggal 15 oktober 2014.

Lydy Reidmiller, Lauri (2003), Art For The Visually Impaired And Blind:A Case Study Of One Artist’s Solution. The Ohio State University: Dissertation.

Mercer, Cecil D & Mercer Ann R. 1993. Teaching Student with Learning Problems. Ohio: Published by Merrill Publishing Company,A Bell & Howell Information Company. diakses pada tanggal 15 oktober 2014.

Nandi (2012). The Use of Interactive Multimedia in Learning Geography in Schools. Jurnal. Accessed 18 Oktober 2014.

Ngalimun, (2014). Learning Strategies and Models. Yogyakarta : Aswaja Pressindo.

S. Salleh and K. Laxman, (2015). “Examining the Effect of External Factors and Context Dependent Beliefs of Teachers in the Use of ICT in Teaching: Using an Elaborated Theory of Planned Behavior,” J. Educ. Technol. Syst., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 289–319. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0047239515570578.

Seels, B. Barbara & Rita C. Richey. 1994. Teknologi Pembelajaran :Definisi dan Kawasannya. (Terjemahan:Instructional Technology: The Definition and Domains of The field). Jakarta : Unit Percetakan Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Smaldino, Sharon E & Russell, James D. 2005. Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. Ohio, Columbus: by Pearson Education, Inc.

Sunanto, Juang. (2005). Mengembangkan Potensi Anak Berkelainan Penglihatan. Jakarta,: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Tenaga Kependidikan dan Ketenagaan Perguruan Tinggi.

Warsita, Bambang. 2008. Learning Technology: Foundations and Applications. Jakarta: published by PT Rineka Cipta.

Widjaya, A (2013). Visual Impairment Forms & Learning Strategies. Yogjakarta : Javalitera.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um005v7i12023p80

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of ICSAR

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of ICSAR is Indexing by:

       

 

web
counter  ---> View Statistic

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.