The Relationship Between Sense of Community And Agreeableness with Prosocial Behavior among Member of Young On Top (YOT)

Ariska Tri Devi, Munawir Yusuf, Hardjono Hardjono

Abstract


Helping behavior that benefits others or society in general called as prosocial behavior. Prosocial behavior refers to voluntary actions that are intended to help and give benefit for another individual or group. Prosocial behavior in the individual in a community or organization can be affected by sense of community and agreeableness. The aim of this study is to determine: (1) the relationship between sense of community and agreeableness with prosocial behavior, (2) the relationship between sense of community with prosocial behavior, and (3) the relationship between agreeableness with prosocial behavior among member of Young On Top (YOT).

The population of this study is member of Young On Top (YOT) region Joglosemar-Jatim 2015 which is divided in six cities, those are in Solo, Semarang, Jogja, Malang, Jember, and Surabaya. Sampling used population studies or census by using the entire population consisting 162 members. Instrument in this study used prosocial behavior scale, sense of community scale, and agreeableness scale using Indonesian version of BFI. Multiple regression analysis was used for examining the first hypothesis, and partial correlation test for examining the second and the third hypothesis.

The result of this study showed that there was a significant positive correlation between sense of community and agreeableness with prosocial behavior among member of Young On Top (YOT) (F-test = 100,875; p < 0,05; and R = 0,784). Partially, the result shows the significant positive correlation between sense of community and prosocial behavior (r = 0,660; p < 0,05), and there is significant positive correlation between agreeableness and prosocial behavior (r = 0,244; p < 0,05). The value of R2 in this study is 0,559 or 55,9% which was of effective contribution of sense of community towards prosocial behavior with amount 47,26% and effective contribution of agreeableness towards prosocial behavior with amount 8,67%.


Keywords


prosocial behavior; sense of community; agreeableness

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badan Pusat Statistik. (2015). Statistik kriminal 2015. Taken from https://www.bps.go.id/website/pdf_publikasi/Statistik-Kriminal-2015.pdf

Baldassarri, D., & Grossman, G. (2014). The effect of group attachment and social position on prosocial behavior. Evidence from lab-in-the-field experiments. Social Structure and Prosocial Behavior, 8(3), 1-9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058750.

Berkman, L., & Glass, T. (2000). Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. dalam L. Berkman, & I. Kawachi (Eds.), Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press.

Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., & Eisenberg, N. (2012). Prosociality: The contribution of traits, values, and self efficacy beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(2), 1289-1303.

Caprara G. V., & Steca P. (2005). Self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of prosocial behavior conducive to life satisfaction across ages. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 191-217.

Carlo, G., Okun, M. A., Knight, G. P., & De Guzman, M. R. (2005). The interplay of traits and motives on volunteering: Agreeableness, extraversion, and prosocial value motivation. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1293-1305.

Caspi A., Harrington, H., Milne, B., Amell, J. W., Theodore, R.F., & Moffitt, T.E. (2003). Children’s behavioral styles at age 3 are linked to their adult personality traits at age 26. Journal Personal. 71, 495-513.

Chen, X., Liu, M., Rubin, K. H., Cen, G., Gao, X., & Li, D. (2002). Sociability and prosocial orientation as predictors of youth adjustment: A seven-year longitudinal study in a chinese sample. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 128-136.

Chipuer. H. M. (2001). Dyadic attachments and community connectedness: Links with youth’s loneliness experiences. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(4), 429-446.

Cloninger, S. C. (2009). Theories of personality: Understanding persons, fifth edition. London: Pearson Practice Hall.

Coté, S., DeCelles, K. A., McCarthy, J. M., Van Kleef, G. A., & Hideg, I. (2011). The Jekyll and Hyde of emotional intelligence: Emotion-regulation knowledge facilitates both prosocial and interpersonally deviant behavior. Journal of Psychological Science, 22(8), 1073-1080.

Cuthill, M. (2002). Coolangatta: A portrait of community well-being. Urban Policy and Research, 20, 187-203.

Dayakisni, T., & Hudaniah. (2009). Psikologi sosial revision edition. Malang: UMM Press.

Eisenberg, N., & Mussen, P. H. (1989). The root of prosocial in children. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Evans, S. (2007). Youth sense of community: Voice and power in community contexts. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 693-709. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20173

Farrell, S. J., Aubry, T., & Coulombe, D. (2004). Neighbourhoods and neighbours: Do they contribute to personal wellbeing?. Journal of Community Psychology, 32(1), 9-25.

Gagne, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Journal of Motivation and Emotion, 27(3), 199-223.

Gerungan, W. A. (1996). Psikologi sosial. Bandung: Eresco.

Goeree, J. K., McConnell, M. A, Mitchell, T., Tromp, T., & Yariv, L. (2010). The 1/d law of giving. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2, 183-203.

Graziano, W. G., & Eisenberg, N. (1997). Agreeableness: A dimension of personality. in R. Hogan, S. Briggs, & J. Johnson (1997) (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology. San Diego: Academic Press.

Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., Sheese, B. E., & Tobin, R. M. (2007). Agreeableness, empathy, and helping: A person x situation perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(4), 583-599.

Hussain, S., Abbas, M., Shahzad, K., & Bukhari, S. A. (2012). Personality and career choices. Journal of Business Management, 6(6), 2255-2260.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big-five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. in L. A. Pervin, & O. P. John (Eds.), Personality: Theory and research (7th ed.). New York: Guildford Press.

Kartono, K. (2005). Patologi sosial 2: Kenakalan remaja. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Krause, N. (2009). Meaning in life and mortality. Journals of Gerontology Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 64, 517-527.

LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 326-336.

Lichtenbarger, D. M. (2000). The effects of similarity on altruism and its relationship to predicted versus actual helping behavior. Department of Psychology, 3, 46-51.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. in Wiggins (Eds.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives. New York: Guilford.

McGinley, M., & Carlo, G. (2007). Two sides of the same coin? The relations between prosocial and physically aggressive behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 337-349.

McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 6-23.

Millie, A. (2009). Anti-social behavior. United Kingdom: Bell and Bain Ltd.

Miller, C. A., Parrott, D. J., & Giancola, P. R. (2009). Agreeableness and alcohol-related aggression: The mediating effect of trait aggressivity. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 17(6), 445-455.

Mount M. K., Murray R. B., & Steve M. S. (2005). Higher-order dimensions of the big five personality traits and the big six vocational interest types. Journal of Psychology, 58, 447-478.

Nolin, D. (2010). Food-sharing networks in Lamalera, Indonesia. Human Nature, 21, 243-268.

Omoto, A. M., & Snyder, M. (2010). Influences of psychological sense of community on voluntary helping and prosocial action. in S. Stumer & M. Snyder (Eds.), The psychology of prosocial behavior: Group processes, intergroup relations, and helping (223-227). New Jersey: Wiley-Balckwell.

Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., & Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365-392.

Pretty, G., Bishop, B., Fisher, A., & Sonn, C. (2006). Psychological sense of community and its relevance to well-being and everyday life in Australia. Taken from The Australian Psychological Society Ltd. website: http://groups.psychology.org.au/assets/files/community-updated-sept061.pdf

Royal, M. A., & Rossi, R. (1996). Individual-level correlates of sense of community: Finings from workplace and school. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 395-416.

Sabiq, Z., & Djalali, M. A. (2012). Kecerdasan emosi, kecerdasan spiritual dan perilaku prososial santri pondok pesantren Nasyrul Ulum Pamekasan. Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 1(2), 53-65.

Sears, D. O., Fredman, J. L., & Peplau, L. A. (1994). Psikologi sosial, fifth edition. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Singh, S., & Teoh, V. Y. (2013). Enhancing prosocial behavior among college students: Exploring the role of abstract mindset. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences. 3(1), 28-32.

Strayhorn, T. L. (2012). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. New York: Routledge.

Thomas, L. (2012, July). Building student engagement and belonging in higher education at a time of change: final report from the what works? Student retention & success programme.https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/what_works_final_report_0.pdf

Yarkoni, T., Ashar, Y. K., & Wager, T. D. (2015, August). Interactions between donor agreeableness and recipient characteristics in predicting charitable donating and positive social evaluation. Diambil dari https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1089

Yuwono, S. (2009, November 11). Islam dan fenomena mutakhir Indonesia. Harian Joglosemar, 8.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 JOURNAL OF ICSAR

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Journal of ICSAR is Indexing by:

View Statistic

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.