Services of the Worship House of the Padepokan Dhammadipa Buddhist House of Worship for People with Disabilities

M. Ilham Nurhakim; Yayuk Yuliati; Fadillah Putra

doi:10.17977/um005v6i12022p007

Services of the Worship House of the Padepokan Dhammadipa Buddhist House of Worship for People with Disabilities

M. Ilham Nurhakim, Yayuk Yuliati, Fadillah Putra

Abstract

Attention to disability is still not evenly distributed. The right to practice worship was not under the needs of disabilities. This study assesses the services of the Padepokan Dhammadipa Arama Buddhist Vihara in Batu City for disabilities. The theory used in this study uses the theory of planned behavior and the theory of social action. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and observations. The data were tested for validity using data triangulation and analyzed using pattern matching, explanations, and time series analysis. The results showed that Vihara administrators did not discriminate against disabilities because the basic principle of Buddhists is compassion. Services that have been provided are in the form of physical services like guardrails and non-physical services like assistance for the mobilization. The existence of this service is influenced by the understanding of disabilities and the urgency of providing services for disabilities. Efforts that continue to be made include innovating in the form of development systems and concepts, adding facilities and infrastructure at the Vihara, and increasing the participation of Buddhists in providing input and suggestions regarding disability services in places of worship. The hope is the existence of physical disability services will increase the security and comfort of people with disabilities in carrying out worship like normal people.

Keywords

services for houses of worship, Vihara, physical disabilities

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n22

Beatson, A., Riedel, A., Chamorro-Koc, M., Marston, G., & Stafford, L. (2020). Encouraging young adults with a disability to be independent in their journey to work: A segmentation and application of Theory of Planned Behavior approach. Heliyon, 6 (2), e03420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03420

Bunbury, S. (2019). Unconscious bias and the medical model: How the social model may hold the key to transformative thinking about disability discrimination. International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 19(1), 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229118820742

Carter, E. (2020). The Absence of Asterisks: The Inclusive Church and Children with Disabilities. Journal of Catholic Education, 23(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.2302142020

Fernandes, R. (2018). School Adaptation to Inclusive Education Policy. Journal of Socius: Journal of Sociology Research and Education. https://doi.org/10.24036/scs.v4i2.16

Fishbein, M, & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

French, D., P., Sutton, S., Hennings, S., J., Mitchell, J., Wareham, NJ, Griffin, S., Hardeman, W., & Kinmonth, AL (2005). The importance of affective beliefs and attitudes in the theory of planned behavior:

Predicting intention to increase physical activity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35 (9), 1824–1848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02197.x

Goering, S. (2015). Rethinking disability: the social model of disability and chronic disease. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 8(2), 134–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9273-z

Jogyanto, H. (2007). Behavioral information system.Andi Offset.

Levitt, JM (2017). Exploring how the social model of disability can be re-invigorated: in response to Mike Oliver. Disability and Society, 32(4), 589–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2017.1300390

Lubis, S., Simamora, N., & ... (2017). The Influence of Pastor Interpersonal Communication on Increasing Congregation's Awareness to Actively Worship in the Christian Church. COMMUNICATION.

Maftuhin, A. (2014). Accessibility of Worship for the Disabled: A Study of Four Mosques in Yogyakarta. Inclusion, 1(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.010207

Millati, S. (2016). Social-Relational Model in the Law on Persons with Disabilities. INCLUSION: Journal of Disability Studies, 3(2), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.030207

Moelong, L., J. (2017). Qualitative Research Methodology (Revi Edition). PT Youth Rosdakarya.

Mujimin, W. (2007). Provision of Humane Public Facilities for Disabled Accessibility. Educational Dynamics Th. XIV / May.

Nafri, J. A. (2019). Perceptions of Students with Disabilities towards Non-Physical Accessibility (Services) in the Library of the Faculty of Education. Areas of Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary, 280–287. https://jurnal.ranahresearch.com/index.php/R2J/article/view/220

Paley, J. (2002). Editorial the Cartesian melodrama in nursing. Nursing Philosophy, 3(3), 189–192.

Rahayu, I. (2019). Special Facilities for Persons with Disabilities and the Elderly at the Makassar Grand Mosque. Nature: National Academic Journal of Architecture.

Ramli, R., B. (2017). Accessibility of Facilities Provision for Person with Disabilities in Mosque. E-Proceedings National Innovation and Invention Competition through Exhibition (ICompEx17).

Ridlwan, Z. (2015). Protection of Constitutional Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Rights of Persons with Disabilities. FIAT JUSTISIA:Journal of Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v7no2.382

Roebyantho, H. (2006). Implementation of Non-Physical Accessibility (Information Services and Special Services) for Persons with

Disabilities in Six Provinces. Socio Conceptia: Journal of Social Welfare Research and Development, 1(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v11i1.588

Ritzer. G. (2010). Sociology of Science with Dual Paradigms. PT. King Grafindo Persada.

Seni, N. N. A., & Ratnadi, N. M. D. (2017). Theory of planned behavior untuk memprediksi niat berinvestasi. E-Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Udayana, 6(12), 4043-4068.

Thohari, S. (2014). Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies View of Disability and Accessibility of Public Facilities for Persons with Disabilities in Malang *Slamet Thohari. Views of Disability and Accessibility of Public Facilities for Persons with Disabilities in Malang City.

Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. Alphabeta, CV.

Syafi'ie, M. (2014). Fulfillment of Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities. INCLUSION. https://doi.org/10.14421/ijds.010208

Syaifurrohman, S., & Erowati, D. (2020). Accessibility of Persons with Disabilities in the 2019 Election in Wonosobo Regency. Muqoddimah Scientific Journal: Journal of Social Sciences, Politics and Humanities, 4(2), 118. https://doi.org/10.31604/jim.v4i2.2020.118-130

Toharuddin. (2016). Buddhist Dharma Teaching Concept of Ethics. Intellectuality, 5(2), 189–204.

Treloar, LL (2002). Treloar-2002-Journal_of_Advanced_Nursing.

Yin, R., K. (2013). Case Study Design & Methods. PT. King Grafindo Persada.

Yiing, C., F, Yaacob, N., M., & Hussein, H. (2013). Achieving Sustainable Development: Accessibility of Green Buildings in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences , 101 , 120–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.185

Yumadhika, R., & Sholihah, AB (2019). Design of Mosque Ablution Areas for Disabled: Evaluation of Ministerial Regulation of Public Works and Public Housing No. 14/2017. Journal of Architectural Research and Design Studies, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jars.vol3.iss1.art2

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um005v6i12022p007